uk person who has never heard of bare wrote:
1. never heard of him
2. fitness is his life so he has lots of time to dedicate to it
3. steroids
I is would never be good at fitness as Nick. You don't truly have unlimited amount of time even if fitness is your life. You have to set aside time for recovery.
There is a strange fascination with this guy by one poster or a couple posters. Starts a thread everytime kissing Bare's behind when he does a workout and tries to diminish real runners. Then posts multiple times on the thread hyping up Bare as some type of God. Look, barely sub 5 at 190 ain't even special. Is this poster perhaps Nick Bare himself?
black white ebony wrote:
There is a strange fascination with this guy by one poster or a couple posters. Starts a thread everytime kissing Bare's behind when he does a workout and tries to diminish real runners. Then posts multiple times on the thread hyping up Bare as some type of God. Look, barely sub 5 at 190 ain't even special. Is this poster perhaps Nick Bare himself?
Why would Nick need to come to LRC to make a point when he has over 200K youtube followes and several thousand IG followers??? He probably does not even know LRC exists.
He trains with a 14:45 guy, the one who paced him to his sub 5. He has validation and respect from proven runners. Doesn't need to troll messageboards.
Plus, Nick is too busy running his company and making marketing material and promotional videos to have time to post on LRC.
He essentailly ran the equivliant of a 2:40 marathon. Great fitness, but he still needs to lose some of those lats, traps and pecks for his marathon goal.
Btw that clean 4:58 was tough, I spent 2 days recovering—from a mile! ?
Now I am 6 months out from my treadmill-trained 5k and my knee is still not perfect, the mill screwed it. It works, but only two days ago did I attempt some sprint drills for the first time. And the 5k was not done at 187lbs.
Distance will take a big toll on a big body. If he goes hard and remains uninjured or a bit too fresh, to me that would be a sign of use. Maybe it’s just that I am not put together well, but in my experience cleanly running consistently hard while heavier = injury.
Sprintgeezer wrote:
Distance will take a big toll on a big body. If he goes hard and remains uninjured or a bit too fresh, to me that would be a sign of use. Maybe it’s just that I am not put together well, but in my experience cleanly running consistently hard while heavier = injury.
Yeah don't compare average physically gifted people with exceptionally physically gifted people like Nick B.
nooblet wrote:
He essentailly ran the equivliant of a 2:40 marathon. Great fitness, but he still needs to lose some of those lats, traps and pecks for his marathon goal.
This made me snort.
If we can acknowledge that freaks of nature in basketball like Zion Williamson exists, why not acknowledge that Nick could be a freak of nature himself. These are people whose physical abilities exceed what their phenotype would suggest as a limitation.
Lenny Leonard wrote:
nooblet wrote:
He essentailly ran the equivliant of a 2:40 marathon. Great fitness, but he still needs to lose some of those lats, traps and pecks for his marathon goal.
This made me snort.
Then that is shows your ignorance because we is use established conversion charts to come up with these equivalencies.
bartholomew_maxwell wrote:
If we can acknowledge that freaks of nature in basketball like Zion Williamson exists, why not acknowledge that Nick could be a freak of nature himself. These are people whose physical abilities exceed what their phenotype would suggest as a limitation.
So if he's such a freak of nature, why has he yet to run a respectable marathon time? If he's such a God of athletics, why did he bonk after 10k at the Austin Marathon.
You can't have it both ways dude.
Why is it so crazy that a new runner (especially a heavier one) is better at shorter distances? How many high schoolers with a 4:53 mile PR could go sub-3? Many of them have probably never run more 8 miles in their lives.
Lifting weights and running low mileage=decent anaerobic engine and bad endurance and aerobic capacity.
Rhodium Nights wrote:
bartholomew_maxwell wrote:
If we can acknowledge that freaks of nature in basketball like Zion Williamson exists, why not acknowledge that Nick could be a freak of nature himself. These are people whose physical abilities exceed what their phenotype would suggest as a limitation.
So if he's such a freak of nature, why has he yet to run a respectable marathon time? If he's such a God of athletics, why did he bonk after 10k at the Austin Marathon.
You can't have it both ways dude.
3:20 2 hr marathon at 200 pounds is beyond respectable. THINK before you post rubbish.
being able to run comfortably under sub-5 but not being able to run under 3:20 sounds like rubbish
black white ebony wrote:
There is a strange fascination with this guy by one poster or a couple posters. Starts a thread everytime kissing Bare's behind when he does a workout and tries to diminish real runners. Then posts multiple times on the thread hyping up Bare as some type of God. Look, barely sub 5 at 190 ain't even special. Is this poster perhaps Nick Bare himself?
No, look at his other threads. He starts threads about Emma Coburn's calves, some female bodybuilder who can kill guys with her thigh "death choke", and other very disturbing fetish things. He is a freak with many fetishes, one obviously for big muscled guys. He is trolling all of you. I think Bare needs to find out who he is and get a restraining order issued. He is not Bare, just a guy with serious issues.
Bare is a salesman who has built a cult following and is making tons of money off it. He sells supplements to suckers. There is nothing he sells that you can't get at GNC, Bodybuilding.com, or any other supplement company. He has found a way to increase sales. The guy is a total narcissist and I believe he fakes his accomplishments to increase his sales to his cult. Seriously, has he ever taken a picture with a shirt on? His instagram screams "Look at me!" "Take my supplements and you can run a sub-4:00 mile, bench press 650 lbs, and have 0% body fat while weighting !"250." His cult would believe him if he said something like that. Look through the comments on his alleged 4:54 mile and see how many of his cult are talking about a sub-4:00 in his near future. They are clueless idiots and he is taking advantage of that ignorance. It's sad but when sales are your occupation you need a niche to be successful. He found one.
bartholomew_maxwell wrote:
Lenny Leonard wrote:
This made me snort.
Then that is shows your ignorance because we is use established conversion charts to come up with these equivalencies.
There’s no “mile to marathon conversion.” The poster used the percentage that both marks are away from the WRs. It’s a chart that a 5th grader with ignorance about the sport would use.
If he is so successful, then why the f**k can’t he afford a t-shirt?
Imagine being so slow you think that PEDs are required for a healthy male to run a 4:53 mile.
Rhodium Nights wrote:
What is deca??
-Guy who doesn't know anything about steroids
Deca-Durabolin, non-injectable steroid.
Here is more general info:
https://steroidcycle.org/insertname wrote:
Imagine being so slow you think that PEDs are required for a healthy male to run a 4:53 mile.
NAILED IT