erik wrote:
If you're going to insist on a geographic modifier, "Chinese Coronavirus" would be the analog to "Spanish Flu." But that doesn't have the same xenophobic punch, so it's not used.
It tells you something when people use non-scientific, non-standard terms to try to relabel the disease. What's the motivation? (We all know, you don't need to answer.)
That being said, in 1918 we also had an extremely racist president, the KKK was active, racism was out in the open, segregation was the law of the land. Are we not going to hold ourselves to a higher stand than in 1918?
What do you mean it doesn't have the "same xenophobic punch"? How about Russian flu or Asian flu? What's the qualitative difference between the terms that make one less or more xenophobic? The country? Ethnicity? Race? I might argue that making such determinations is a "racist" act itself...
See how silly and convoluted this all gets?
As for "what's the motivation?" - Well of course, you think racism or something. Perhaps, it's that we're at literal 'war' and many countries are finger-pointing, now calling this a "bioweapon"? You're right, times have changed. The whole world is literally shutting down. This doesn't happen over a naturally-occurring virus, folks. Keep reading the articles they pump out to pacify you...
We're at war with "the invisible enemy" and you can either remain asleep or wake the f*ck up