going faster miles an hour wrote:
darkwave: Nice week. I don’t know if this is something you’ve talked about before, but I’d be interested to hear more about your thoughts on the shorter vs. longer marathon block.
So....I think many runners go with way too long a training cycle, and are way past their sell date by the time their marathon rolls around. More is not always better in terms of length of a cycle - if you have 18 weeks before a marathon, I think one is better off doing two shorter cycles - train for something shorter, and then shift to the marathon.
That being said, I don't think everyone needs to, or should, do cycles as short as I do. I'm someone that
a) maintains a pretty high volume year round (so no need to build up)
b) has no issue covering the distance of the marathon - (26 miles is not terribly hard for me, even when out of shape. 26 miles FAST is the challenge)
c) due to age/autoimmune issues/whathaveyou I get injured/overtrained easily if I'm not mindful.
So...for all those reasons, it makes sense to limit my marathon training to no more than 6 weeks or so. And if I've done a marathon recently (within the past 4-5 months) we can go shorter than that. But others are different, and might not be able to get away with what I can, in terms of marathon training.
That being said, my preference for myself would be what I did last year, with essentially 3 phases: a) after a break, start back with hills and aerobic intervals on the roads. Do this for a few weeks.
b) shift to racing 5Ks and miles
c) do about 6 weeks of marathon training, followed by a half-marathon raced all out as the final hard workout, and then taper.
Basically, I get myself strong, then work on my weaknesses, and then shift to my strengths.
Someone with different strengths and weaknesses would obviously train in a different way. If the sheer distance of 26 miles is an obstacle when out of shape, then you need to spend time base building before shifting to your strengths. [I never base build. I speed build.]