GetPAID wrote:
Had this thought today that the handful of 2:11 guys who may or may not come close to top 3 at the trials, wouldn't make more sense career wise and also for their bank account to instead focus on being top 5 and top American at Boston. I would imagine prize money and a sponsor pay day has to be better than maybe, maybe not qualifying for trials. And then even if you do get an Olympic spot what then? finish in 20th place?
I would assume a weak American field at Boston being only 6 weeks from trials. Thoughts?
Placing well or qualifying for the Olympics can be a huge financial boon to a career. The long-term payback in contract incentives and future appearance fees will make the risk worth it. Most of the guys they should run at the trials.
But my thought would be if you hit halfway to 18 miles if things are not going well then drop out you should strongly consider dropping out and saving it for a spring marathon. This will allow plenty of time to be ready for a solid Boston performance.
In my mind, someone like Desi should consider not running the trials or Olympics and focus on collecting those appearance fees she has left. Unless of course for sponsorship reasons it makes more financial sense to run the trials and Olympics which it may. But her making another Olympic team and finishing top 20 or 10 will not add anything to her career over a couple more high finishes at majors.