Anti-trans Hater Joe Rogan comes out against allowing ALL women participate in Women's Sports calling it a hill he'll die on

Why do trannies get their knickers in a twist so easily?

Agreed, I'm with Rogan on this one... If that's hate, so be it!!!

Islam is right about women, "trans" or otherwise.

Any Islamphobics dare to disagree?

This is a big duh wrote:

Sad. wrote:

Most sane people agree with him.

So does the OP, which is obvious with the tone they’ve taken.

+1 to both posts

Not an every day topic wrote:

Rogan welcomed comedian Greg Fitzimmons to the podcast and the topic of transgender MMA fighters came up

Err... why?

Well Joe’s an MMA commentator and obviously a general fan of fighting and sports. And it’s a topic he’s talked about on and off (trans women in sports) for quite a while now.

Leftist Dilemma wrote:

Islam is right about women, "trans" or otherwise.

Any Islamphobics dare to disagree?

Just ship these freaks to Afghanistan.

The whole trans issue is completely out of control. It has no basis in legitamite science. There is no male or female gender that can be defined or tested by a doctor, let alone biologically uneducated self diagnosing individuals.

Males display certain personality traits differently to women ON AVERAGE.

This cannot be used to define a gender. It's like saying that because men are taller than women on average, therefore a 6ft tall girl is a man because she is taller than the average male!

Gender is really just a vague way sociologists use to categorize differences in the average personalities between the sexes. But cannot be used on individual basis.

Sex is defined by chromosomes except in rare genetic disorders.

Gender is not defined and therefore means nothing but personality and feelings.

You cannot be a man and compete in women's sports just because of your feelings

Why is it that Science Deniers think cis and trans are bad words? They are ACTUAL descriptions, unlike Gender which is just a social construct.

A trans is simply someone who identifies genderly in a different way from the antediluvian social conventions about their birth-assigned genitalia (in a more perfect and less hateful world, it wouldn't be needed). A cis, simply by opposition, is therefore a non-trans.

So we see a transwoman is a woman. And it's called women's sports, not ciswomen sports. By fundamental rights, you have to let all the women play, by definition. The days of exclusion and discrimination should be behind us here in 2019.

It seems to me that common sense is being smeared as hate these days.

Lessons from the ADL.

Quid Pro Quo wrote:

Why is it that Science Deniers think cis and trans are bad words? They are ACTUAL descriptions, unlike Gender which is just a social construct.

A trans is simply someone who identifies genderly in a different way from the antediluvian social conventions about their birth-assigned genitalia (in a more perfect and less hateful world, it wouldn't be needed). A cis, simply by opposition, is therefore a non-trans.

So we see a transwoman is a woman. And it's called women's sports, not ciswomen sports. By fundamental rights, you have to let all the women play, by definition. The days of exclusion and discrimination should be behind us here in 2019.

You call others science deniers and then claim a trans woman is a woman??!!

The reality is biological males will remain male regardless what they believe or any procedures they have attempting alter that.

There is no gender. It is a social construct as you say, so someone cannot be transgender if gender does not exist.

Biology is what matters. The rest is feelings and perception.

There is no gender. It is a social construct as you say, so someone cannot be transgender if gender does not exist.

Now they change the argument again and claim: Social Constructs do Not Exist.

Of course they do!, that's exactly the point as to why we see so much agitation today. Because the wrong social constructs have been existent for too long. Gender has always existed, and will always exist. But today we now acknowledge that the prior concepts of it were rooted in phony ordeals like genitalia. Rather than a grammarian triad, there are many and multiple for each individual to be enlivened and fulfilled. But "women's sports" would rather move us back to the dark ages by their narrow happenings.

You came here to stir stuff up but failed so hard as no one (But trannys) think it’s okay for biological men to be beating women and taking women’s record in sports.

Nice try but legit everyone here but you disagrees with Rogan.

A former transgender says, "I have these seeds of doubt and confusion from the dress, from being affirmed as a girl and from being abused as a boy."

You leftists have serious problems if someone who used to be transgender himself admits that transgender people need mental help. You lost the argument.

An 11-year-old child cannot buy a beer or drive a car. He or she is not developed enough to make life-altering decisions.

"...80 to 95 percent of children who express a discordant gender identity will naturally grow out of it and come to identify with their bodily sex if development is allowed to proceed." Most children who want to be transgender will grow out of those feelings. For example, a tomboy may copy her older brothers, but later in life she starts to wear makeup and a dress.

"Puberty blocking hormones gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists or GnRH agonists arrest bone growth, decrease bone density, prevent the sex-steroid dependent organization and maturation of the adolescent brain, and inhibit fertility by preventing the development of gonadal tissue and mature gametes for the duration of treatment."

You have the freedom to cut your balls off for the pursuit of happiness, but then I have the freedom of speech to say you're crazy to do that. Leftists go by emotion and become outraged easily when normal people use facts and common sense.

Nobody here can argue against this.

Quid Pro Quo wrote:

Why is it that Science Deniers think cis and trans are bad words? They are ACTUAL descriptions, unlike Gender which is just a social construct.

A trans is simply someone who identifies genderly in a different way from the antediluvian social conventions about their birth-assigned genitalia (in a more perfect and less hateful world, it wouldn't be needed). A cis, simply by opposition, is therefore a non-trans.

So we see a transwoman is a woman. And it's called women's sports, not ciswomen sports. By fundamental rights, you have to let all the women play, by definition. The days of exclusion and discrimination should be behind us here in 2019.

I’m not a science denier, quite the opposite.

CIS is a bad word because it is most often used as a derogatory term by activists to dismiss the views of anyone not transgender. There is no reason to create a special label that includes everyone but a very minuscule percent of the population.

We live in a time when someone who thinks they are special can choose any pronoun they want to be called, but at the same time they want to label everyone else cis if they like it or not.

I guess I'm a leftist, but people deciding to transgender has nothing to do with me. I'm not outraged by your opinion at all and have seen hundreds of posts similar to yours.

So criticism (by certain groups) is now hate. Got it.

Maybe such decisions have nothing to do with you, but I believe US taxpayer dollars funded Bradley Manning's "transition" (the US Army was forced or agreed to pay). I think many US taxpayers are not pleased with that.

SDSU Aztec wrote:

I guess I'm a leftist, but people deciding to transgender has nothing to do with me. I'm not outraged by your opinion at all and have seen hundreds of posts similar to yours.

Maybe you're a moderate leftist or centrist.

You cannot deny the outrage, protests, and tears on the left side.

facts and reason wrote:

You have the freedom to cut your balls off for the pursuit of happiness, but then I have the freedom of speech to say you're crazy to do that. Leftists go by emotion and become outraged easily when normal people use facts and common sense.

Nobody here can argue against this.

I don’t think anyone here is arguing against it. Just because you say someone is crazy, it doesn’t make you right. If a man wants to live his life as a woman, let it happen. If she then wants to participate in a sport, let it happen. I honestly don’t see how anti-trans people have so much free time and energy to devote to something like arguing incessantly that this is some kind of national crisis.

It’s sports, man. Chill out.