From what I have read the in report I do not see a just reason for the ban. If I were Pro, I would HOPE that my coach took such diligence to ensure any substance I took or came in contact with would NOT result in a positive test. I would also hope that my coach would research and explore any and all options to maximize my ability. That to me sounds like an incredible coach to me, and his athletes results speak to that. Haters be haters.
Until there is proof that his athletes broke any doping rules (which I have yet to see) then I really don't see any wrong doing. Also I personally don't care if Sal doped Magnass to the gills with every illegal substance known to man. Magnass is not a pro athlete, end of story. That's like busting Rupp for doping because his DAD takes steroids (for example, not true). What a coach does to non athletes for educational reasons is no concern to me.
Until I see proof an ATHLETE doped, Sal is innocent and USADA is a disgrace. And this is not like Armstrong. Armstrong had many people coming forward stating they saw him (the athlete) doping. Who has ever seen one of Sal's athletes doping?
So we walk into an otherwise empty alley and I shoot you in the face. I exit the alley and 50 people see the gun in my hand and your brains on my shirt. People accuse me of shooting you and I say, "No I didn't. The gun is to insure other people didn't shoot you. Nobody saw me shoot you. Where's the proof that I shot you? It is just hearsay that I shot you, second hand information." I'm every bit as innocent as Salazar.