ghjhhh wrote:
Norman's interview was just strange.....
He wasn't hurt. He was scared. When you are suddenly scared to lose then it's not supposed to make sense, whether it's how he handled the remainder of the race or the post race interview.
I don't think it's overly complicated: Earlier in the year Norman defeats Lyles. He assumes the remainder of the season is going to be one routine victory after another, and likewise for his buddy Rai Benjamin. Both of them were prepared to win easily. They weren't prepared to fight for it.
Once Norman lost to Kerley a few months ago he was stunned. You could see it in his face and body language. Kerley wasn't some upstart who could be dismissed as a one-time fluke. He was an extraordinary talent at an early age who then had a couple of lull years. Consequently Norman knows he now has a problem. Athletes are never stupid enough to focus on current form. They value the kid who was always the best in the playground and on the streets. That is a Fred Kerley type.
Norman saw his buddy Benjamin forced to answer questions all year about the Norwegian guy. What an annoyance. But Norman assumed it would straighten itself out in the end. How is some white guy from Norway going to hang with my bro Rai?
Whoops. The Norwegian guy won. Norman saw his buddy Benjamin labor down the stretch and then throw out injury excuses. The only thing Benjamin didn't do -- to his immense credit -- is grab his hamstring with 20 meters remaining and launch a feigned pained facial expression while bouncing around on one leg. For a few seconds...the perfected track tactic.
Josh Norman doesn't want to deal with any of those decisions. He senses he's going to lose the final to Fred Kerley, and perhaps others. Much easier to simply avoid the final in the first place.
But since it's not a scenario he planned or practiced long in advance, he doesn't have an ideal blueprint toward how to lose that semi, nor how to conduct the interview following the Doha jog.
It was a track version of "No Mas"