You respond to my post by responded to another poster. Strange.
You respond to my post by responded to another poster. Strange.
Wow. This is amazing. Tim Tebow's personal trainer Ian Danney - a man whom he praised in his book as "Ian's magic" got his injuries to heal so quickly - has been accused by a cyclist who was banned from USADA of pumping her up with PEDs.
The cyclist has called on Tim Tebow to testify at the trial.
You know, you're like a week late, and aiming for a weaky "sport" like women's cycling.
This guy's 5th amendment pleading was all over NFL football (USA) news.
https://www.breitbart.com/sports/2019/09/04/nfl-trainer-pleads-fifth-amendment-46-times-during-drug-lawsuit/Drainthefecesswamp wrote:
huh?? wrote:
how is this amazing? Wouldn't you think that most pro football players are on PEDS, I mean who can really blame them?
You really think the NFL is earnestly trying to stop players from using PEDs? the testing program is purely PR/CYA material
Or did you think Tebow was the one exception?
I agree that doping is likely rampant in the NFL, even more so than track. Their testing is less stringent and the money is much greater.
On the other hand, other than the greater amount of money, an NFL quarterback has far less incentive to cheat than a track athlete. The skill aspect is so much greater than the physical aspect. PEDs likely wont help you throw much harder, so the importance of the skill aspect is much greater.
The main aspect I'd see a quarterback feeling like it was worth the risk to dope would be coming back from injury. However, most of their injuries are the type that drugs dont help with: rotator cuff, cracked ribs, torn acl, etc.
We're talking about Tebow here, not your prototypical QB. For sure PEDs would have helped him, as his game was heavily predicated on him running the ball, often into contact of opposing defenses. The more mass he has, the better he can withstand the hits.
Drainthefecesswamp wrote:
huh?? wrote:
how is this amazing? Wouldn't you think that most pro football players are on PEDS, I mean who can really blame them?
You really think the NFL is earnestly trying to stop players from using PEDs? the testing program is purely PR/CYA material
Or did you think Tebow was the one exception?
I agree that doping is likely rampant in the NFL, even more so than track. Their testing is less stringent and the money is much greater.
On the other hand, other than the greater amount of money, an NFL quarterback has far less incentive to cheat than a track athlete. The skill aspect is so much greater than the physical aspect. PEDs likely wont help you throw much harder, so the importance of the skill aspect is much greater.
The main aspect I'd see a quarterback feeling like it was worth the risk to dope would be coming back from injury. However, most of their injuries are the type that drugs dont help with: rotator cuff, cracked ribs, torn acl, etc.
The PEDs are likely for recovery in you're a quarterback. HGH etc.
Remember the Manning scandal a few years ago. I'm certain he used them.
It's definitely an issue for strength and mass, but also for recovery because for some of these guys it's hard to walk the day after a game because they're so beat up. Drugs help that.
typical speculation on Letsrun wrote:
Drainthefecesswamp wrote:
I agree that doping is likely rampant in the NFL, even more so than track. Their testing is less stringent and the money is much greater.
On the other hand, other than the greater amount of money, an NFL quarterback has far less incentive to cheat than a track athlete. The skill aspect is so much greater than the physical aspect. PEDs likely wont help you throw much harder, so the importance of the skill aspect is much greater.
The main aspect I'd see a quarterback feeling like it was worth the risk to dope would be coming back from injury. However, most of their injuries are the type that drugs dont help with: rotator cuff, cracked ribs, torn acl, etc.
The PEDs are likely for recovery in you're a quarterback. HGH etc.
Remember the Manning scandal a few years ago. I'm certain he used them.
It's definitely an issue for strength and mass, but also for recovery because for some of these guys it's hard to walk the day after a game because they're so beat up. Drugs help that.
Grier is the backup at Carolina
just asking questions! wrote:
what does this have to do with running?
Knew around here, huh?
Luv2Run wrote:
just asking questions! wrote:
what does this have to do with running?
Knew around here, huh?
"Knew"---what the heck?
huh?? wrote:
I swear there's like 30% of the population who really struggle with interpreting anything not directly stated.
Is this your first day on the internet? 98% of the population will deliberately misinterpret anything said by anyone they disagree with no matter how clearly it's stated.
LoneStarXC wrote:
Drug testing in the NFL is a sham.
Since lone star said it’s a sham. It’s safe to assume it’s actually pretty good.
You're off on so much here wrote:
You respond to my post by responded to another poster. Strange.
My first paragraph was replying to you... I didnt want to make two separate posts. Sorry, I guess?
ThatAverageRunner wrote:
LoneStarXC wrote:
Drug testing in the NFL is a sham.
Since lone star said it’s a sham. It’s safe to assume it’s actually pretty good.
Average, why are you a doping apologist?
...and circumcision. Anyone doing that in the way he did it is one sick SOaG.
Luv2Run wrote:
Luv2Run wrote:
Knew around here, huh?
"Knew"---what the heck?
Oh, it's dipsh!t central around here. It's geniuses like these that write their uneducated opinions all over this board and pass them off as fact.