Roger Stone arrested

The congressional wrote:

celery wrote:

Don't malign the proud boys. What do you have against them? Did you move to the North West like you were planning? You run into them when you're marching with ANTIFA? I hope you try to start a fight with them. They know how to finish fights with little piss ants like you. Or maybe when you're visiting you girlfriends family in Kansas City, you might run into some Proud Boys. They have chapters in every city you know.

Have fun with your tibia and foot stress fractures wimp.

Wow. You are very upset and eager to defend a group of thugs.

+1

legal offense funder wrote:

flying the coop wrote:

Why did they release him on bail???

AFAIK, the $250k bond is (by far) the lowest ever after a 20+ person FBI raid.

Likely the "judge" has some Mar-A-Lago connections or something.

oh FFS - look up a fact or two before posting. The Judge is the same one who threw Manafort in Jail - hardly the Mar-A-Lago type.

I was wrong to say I would break your nose, or to bring up places you might possibly live (which I found from a simple search of letsrun). I was angry about the way you talked about the Proud Boys. I'm not going to do anything to try to find out who you really are or anyone you know.

Here's why your Proud Boys comment set me off:

Someone else talked about Roger stone being raped, and you chimed in approvingly, that the Proud Boys won't be able to protect him. Why would you think of the Proud Boys as "protecting" people unless you were the sort of person that wanted to attack the people the Proud Boys protect? And who attacks people the Proud Boys protect? ANTIFA.

I'm not saying I know you are ANTIFA, but you are at least expressing sympathy with them. They are a know terrorist organization. This is what set me off.

I was probably wrong to think you are associated with ANTIFA. If so, rest assured that I mean you no harm. Maybe you are sympathetic to ANTIFA, if so, I am saddened that you have been tricked into thinking ANTIFA is somehow the good guys. Maybe you actually are an active supporter of ANTIFA. If so, then I stand by my comment that you are my enemy and if I ever met you in real life, I would understand that since you think violence is appropriate, I would respond accordingly.

celery wrote:

looks like Gary wrote:

You say you are not Gary. Looks like Gary and your crazy talk sounds like Gary. I think you are probably Gary. Hi Gary! How's the militia?

Yes, I'm Gary, you caught me.

Ha ha te haha, such an egregious dimwittef tool! Doesn’t matter if you are Gary or not. Just an idiot but who hoo! Such tough talk. You and your ilk are going down. And we laugh at you.

You're back tracking at an incredible rate. You seriously over stepped the mark. Others have pointed that out also. You spoke about meeting me and breaking my nose, you spoke about what will happen when the civil war starts, you spoke about where I live, you spoke about my girlfriend and you spoke about her family. You spoke about the Proud Boys having chapters wherever I go. I have no alternative but to take that seriously.

I've absolutely nothing to with ANTIFA and so have no reason to defend them. I regard ANTIFA and the Proud Boys as violent thugs. The FBI regard them as an extremist group. Only reason I referenced them is because I regard Stones use of them for protection as immoral. That's my personal belief.

dbags wrote:

legal offense funder wrote:

AFAIK, the $250k bond is (by far) the lowest ever after a 20+ person FBI raid.

Likely the "judge" has some Mar-A-Lago connections or something.

oh FFS - look up a fact or two before posting. The Judge is the same one who threw Manafort in Jail - hardly the Mar-A-Lago type.

Err, sorry to refute your "facts", but as your link says, Amy Berman Jackson is the DC judge who will be handling the case.

But the judge who granted him bail was the local Fort Lauderdale guy.

How is that hard to understand?

Anyway, I'm guessing she'll gag him, revoke his bail, put in weeks/months of solitary confinement, etc.

Is this really happening? I'm not the only one who is seeing this, right?

Stone got off easy. Watergate they used like 7 guys just to pick a lock & steal some paperwork! And Stone justified that.

Ciro wrote:

[You're back tracking at an incredible rate. You seriously over stepped the mark. Others have pointed that out also. You spoke about meeting me and breaking my nose, you spoke about what will happen when the civil war starts, you spoke about where I live, you spoke about my girlfriend and you spoke about her family. You spoke about the Proud Boys having chapters wherever I go. I have no alternative but to take that seriously.

I've absolutely nothing to with ANTIFA and so have no reason to defend them. I regard ANTIFA and the Proud Boys as violent thugs. The FBI regard them as an extremist group. Only reason I referenced them is because I regard Stones use of them for protection as immoral. That's my personal belief.

You are right, I overstepped the mark. And the way I mentioned where you or your GF fam might live was inappropriate.

I'm glad to hear you don't defend ANTIFA. As for the Proud Boys, the FBI never said they were an extremist group. That was a fake news story that was refuted a few days after the original story. It's too bad you fell for it. It's very frustrating that fake news can spread lies about the Proud Boys, and unsuspecting people fall for it. That frustration was why I responded to you the way I did.

Alan Dershowitz is perhaps the only liberal left in America who is not certifiably insane (#TDS).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUdHm_85Nd8

Glad you two could make amends and not allow everything to escalate. How about a group hug now???

Celery stated someone's name and where said individual may live and threatened said individual. Celery slightly apologized then explained. Celery stated the Fascist hate group he sponsors is not a Fascist hate group. A bell cannot be unrung.

The Proud Boys would be very disappointed in your apologizing And acquiescing. Grow a spine!

in politics, timing is everything wrote:

Put on Full Blast wrote:

It's a two-way street.

There was no point of the cameras without the Raid.

And conversely, no point of the Raid w/o the cameras.

So, cui bono?

Not to mention Mueller was desperate to win the media cycle, over Trump's successful (though temporary) resolution of the #ShutDown.

Nope, the synchronicity was actually about the Pientka/FISA fraud about to unravel.

The recent Baker testimony tipped the scales, so Mueller acted first, controlling the weekend talkheads.

never back down brother wrote:

The Proud Boys would be very disappointed in your apologizing And acquiescing. Grow a spine!

Maybe so, but I was wrong to attack him the way I did, and for that I apologized. I made all sort of assumptions about him based on a short comment he made.

In retrospect, I wish I had asked him what he had against the Proud Boys, and then just linked to one of the many articles explaining how the FBI never categorized them as an extremist group. That could have been affective to open his mind to something he didn't know, though I doubt it. But still, my approach was foolish.

celery wrote:

Ciro wrote:

Don't threaten me.

Don't malign the proud boys. What do you have against them? Did you move to the North West like you were planning? You run into them when you're marching with ANTIFA? I hope you try to start a fight with them. They know how to finish fights with little piss ants like you. Or maybe when you're visiting you girlfriends family in Kansas City, you might run into some Proud Boys. They have chapters in every city you know.

Have fun with your tibia and foot stress fractures wimp.

Wow.

You.

Sound.

So.

Tough.

Like a real Internet tough guy. Count me impressed (snicker, snicker).

I've little or no concern about the classification of the Proud Boys, I have my own views on them as violent liberty takers.

That's all irrelevant, what is relevant are your threats. I'll deal with them accordingly, I've nothing else to say to you no matter how hard you grovel.