Not really sure what your malfunction is, but I'll try to help you with it.
What I and others *correctly* criticized is the fact that Parker has run like a moron in both his marathon attempts, and paid for it with unnecessarily crappy results.
Both times he went out at stupid paces *no one* thought he could hold --and both times he naturally *failed* spectacularly to hold them, and crashed out to performances *much* worse than he could've hit if he'd gone out at a pace he was actually *capable* of.
Our interest in making this obvious observation (in my case, at least) is that we'd really like to see the kid do well, and would *love* to see at least ONE of the younger Americans actually achieve something halfway respectable in the marathon sometime before we're all dead.
That's not *too* difficult for you to understand, is it?
Parker's done the same stupid thing in *other* earlier races, too, including at least one NCAA championship on the track, where he once again went out at a pace *way* over his head, and paid for it by crashing out badly in the last quarter of the race --getting beat by several guys he could've and should've handled comfortably.
So it appears to be something of a long-standing psychological issue with this kid, not just a one- or two-time freak thing.
Obviously, it should be the easiest thing in the world to *fix*, which is why it's so freaking frustrating to see him do it again and again.
In the half-mar, for whatever reason, he *hasn't* done that. I think he's run three of them now (three more recent ones that I remember off-hand, anyway), and all three have been pretty good performances.
In all of them he ran controlled, and disciplined, and did a solid job of running a well-chosen, consistent, reasonable pace,... and in all three he was rewarded with good results.
His result this weekend was light-years better than his last marathon performance,... and that's exactly *because* he ran intelligently and rationally this time, while he ran stupidly and *irrationally* last time.
This race would seem to indicate he ought to be able to go 2:11, or even better, for a full mar, but we'll obviously have to see him actually DO it, since he hasn't gotten anywhere close to that so far.
Ritzie --who's always been a very smart and disciplined racer, even when he seemed to really run his guts out-- should probably be a great influence on the kid, but we'll have to see.
If he runs like someone who actually wants to be a good marathoner next time, and goes out at a sane and reasonable pace, and hits that 2:11 or better, we'll know there's some hope for the kid --and that would be great.
If he talks a good game, and then goes out at 2:06 pace again, and crashes out yet one more time, we'll naturally feel like he's just hopelessly stupid, and maybe we'll simply stop caring.
I wish him all the best, but one more idiotic marathon will be three strikes, you're *out* for me.
There's a limit to how much stupidity I can handle (which is exactly why I rarely look at the LR message-boards anymore).
Can you process all that, or do I need to use even *smaller* words?