Subway Surfers wrote:
Barrel of Laughs wrote:
Based on the crazy number of Kenyan doping positives - have you been living in a cave or something? ? And unless you believe in a 100% detection rate, the number of Kenyans busted isn't representative of the number of actual dopers!
Perhaps good old VIPAM is really one of those Japanese WWII soldiers marooned on a tiny Pacific atoll.
What I dont get is this - To support the "must be doping" narrative, many assert that 40% plus international athletes anonymously admitted doping when polled - the inference being that the 40% represents both Western & Eastern countries combined & therefore the percentage of dopers within supposed unchecked environments like Kenya/Ethiopia would be much higher.
Ok so if we accept this rationale, why are athletes such as Ayana still so much ahead of their (doped) East African rivals? - Why does she front run the way she does - something nobody else can replicate ? - Are we to believe that her doping is somehow more sophisticated and stronger than the others? What is the magical combination here? - is she an average athlete made superhuman? is she a great athlete made greater by pharmacology? Is she the only one doping?
Or is she simply the hardest working mentally applied athlete who also has an enormous talent. - If she is doped to the gills on EPO as many posters attest, why is she so depleted and runs poorly (by her standards) in her second event of Olympics & WC (5K) - This certainly didnt happen to Wang Junxia who ran 29.17, 3.50, 8.06 (plus heats) all within ten days of each other - and she was doped.
All in all the doping equation doesnt add up to me,