Official Brett Kavanaugh confirmation thread

joedirt wrote:

Outraged wrote:

What dystopia are you living in where someone accused of a crime has to prove beyond any possibility otherwise that s/he did not commit the crime?

Because there are elements on the left that no longer believe in the rule of law and that no one claiming to be a victim of sexual assault can have an ulterior motive.

first of all never link to the Post, it just makes you look stupid.

2nd repeat after me "Kavanaugh was not on trial". "Kavanaugh was not on trial". "Kavanaugh was not on trial".

this was a determination of his fitness for SCOTUS. He failed but ironically the accusation gave him cover to his idiotic ranting. He actually should be thanking the Dems because no way he gets in unless he was accused. It provided the distraction from his non-sexual assualt past. Atticus wouln't even consider defending a rich, entitled prick. He was a liberal and you cannot change that.

These pro-Kavanaugh posts have shown me one thing...

The white male vicitimhood mentality is alive and well and here it is multiplied by the skinny runner "picked on" mentality.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Dwumpfling lol wrote:

I have said no such thing. I maintain that he will benefit liberal elites more than the forgotten man. And I haven’t received a masculine response to the contrary. I therefore assume you agree and accept it, and would just prefer to have your emotions pampered by a man who wears makeup.

Sore loser, sore loser. Waah, waah, waah.

https://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fimages-na.ssl-images-amazon.com%2Fimages%2FI%2F71g4sK8YTML._SX466_.jpg&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FLiberal-Tears-Drinking-Stein-Clear%2Fdp%2FB0778Y8JGL&docid=FVYLZqRPJa-e0M&tbnid=IbYJZiqbON87lM%3A&vet=1&w=466&h=466&hl=en-us&source=sh%2Fx%2Fim

Any chimp could come on here and post the same image in the face of an argument that is awkward to reconcile. Be a man. Make an argument.

This country was founded by masculine intellectuals, not this emotional makeup stuff. Ughh

I like you.

Fwumpy dwumpf wrote:

Any chimp could come on here and post the same image in the face of an argument that is awkward to reconcile. Be a man. Make an argument.

This country was founded by masculine intellectuals, not this emotional makeup stuff. Ughh

the real atticus wrote:

first of all never link to the Post, it just makes you look stupid.

2nd repeat after me "Kavanaugh was not on trial". "Kavanaugh was not on trial". "Kavanaugh was not on trial".

this was a determination of his fitness for SCOTUS. He failed but ironically the accusation gave him cover to his idiotic ranting. He actually should be thanking the Dems because no way he gets in unless he was accused. It provided the distraction from his non-sexual assualt past. Atticus wouln't even consider defending a rich, entitled prick. He was a liberal and you cannot change that.

These pro-Kavanaugh posts have shown me one thing...

The white male vicitimhood mentality is alive and well and here it is multiplied by the skinny runner "picked on" mentality.

I'm not pro Kavanaugh at all. I'm not political at all. I'm witnessing this and meh-particitpating in discussion about it as neutrally as possible. I made a reply to a comment that stated Kavanaugh 'didn't prove he didn't do it' as some sort of evidence that he was guilty. Me, don't-give-a-F-about-anything-robot, simply stated that having to prove you didn't do something is not a viable way to determine truth. I know it's not a trial, that doesn't change the fact that it is a poor approach to determining guilt (maybe the legal system does it like this for a reason, huh?).

split it into two wrote:

It is time to split the country into two. Let the Trumpers who want it only their way all co-locate in a contiguous red area (ND, SD, NE, MT, ID & WY). They can create Trumpland with Trump voted in as their dictator for life. They will be required to build a wall completely around themselves to create their ideal safe place. They can then ban all imports. They will have to ban all exports to make that work.

That's a wonderful idea. We should do it immediately. There's no better time than the present!

This never gets old wrote:

Fwumpy dwumpf wrote:

Any chimp could come on here and post the same image in the face of an argument that is awkward to reconcile. Be a man. Make an argument.

This country was founded by masculine intellectuals, not this emotional makeup stuff. Ughh

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/71g4sK8YTML._SX466_.jpg

It’s over. I concede. May your emotions remain pampered.

TERFS? - WTF? wrote:

Here's an example of tribal infighting:

tribal infighting wrote:

A better example is the Republican party fracturing apart, rebranding itself as the Trumpers, and shrinking in size to weed out the non-compliant. The Trumper party is growing smaller, and smaller, as it seeks to the holy grail of "perfection."

The Republicans view perfection as raping women, raping the public as a whole, denying and covering their actions while they know it is true, and rejoicing with the more heinous acts they commit.

dunes runner wrote:

split it into two wrote:

It is time to split the country into two. Let the Trumpers who want it only their way all co-locate in a contiguous red area (ND, SD, NE, MT, ID & WY). They can create Trumpland with Trump voted in as their dictator for life. They will be required to build a wall completely around themselves to create their ideal safe place. They can then ban all imports. They will have to ban all exports to make that work.

That's a wonderful idea. We should do it immediately. There's no better time than the present!

Good... get ur'ass on down to the south, that you fought so hard to save.

"Perfection" wrote:

TERFS? - WTF? wrote:

Here's an example of tribal infighting:

tribal infighting wrote:

A better example is the Republican party fracturing apart, rebranding itself as the Trumpers, and shrinking in size to weed out the non-compliant. The Trumper party is growing smaller, and smaller, as it seeks to the holy grail of "perfection."

Hillary Clinton views perfection as raping women, raping the public as a whole, denying and covering Bill's actions while she knows it is true, and rejoicing with the more heinous acts they commit.

Fixed it for ya^^^

yuseffasshat wrote:

Ever heard the old saying that you can attract more flies with honey than vinegar? That's how I see the Left. They have played this so incredibly poorly.

Trump is crazy retarded idiot. He says nutty things, doesn't speak well, goes on childish twitter rants, his personal life is that of a self centered cad. He is unPresidential in every way. There are A LOT of Republicans that cannot stand Trump, but...

Had the Dems decided to be the opposite of Trump they could have picked up some of these more moderate GOPers. Instead they went full bore Leftist hysterical nut bag. That scares off people that are fond of sanity and expect some degree of stateliness out of their leaders.

Also agree. It's a shame that Democrats seem incapable of being less nutty and not embracing the hysterical left wing of the party. Their leaders just dont seem able to appreciate how so much of their actions and talking points come across to "normal" folks in middle America. I still think back to the 2004 election and how condescending the left was towards people who were Bush supporters. I know it wasn't US-based, but I think there was a British paper whose cover said something like "how can 54 million people be so stupid?" the morning after the election. That characterized the attitude of Democrats in America. Also see the South Park episode that parodied the attitude towards regretful Trump supporters as an example of a bad strategy from Democrats and the left.

If you don't realize how twisted and biased your reasoning has to be to arrive at this conclusion, I can only pray that you someday find the mental capacity and resources to step out of the partisan fog in which you live.

"Perfection" wrote:

TERFS? - WTF? wrote:

Here's an example of tribal infighting:

tribal infighting wrote:

A better example is the Republican party fracturing apart, rebranding itself as the Trumpers, and shrinking in size to weed out the non-compliant. The Trumper party is growing smaller, and smaller, as it seeks to the holy grail of "perfection."

The Republicans view perfection as raping women, raping the public as a whole, denying and covering their actions while they know it is true, and rejoicing with the more heinous acts they commit.

you guessed it...the Clintons!!! Thank you Trump for saving us from 4 more years of Democratic "perfection"!

Statto wrote:

Isn't it ironic, don't ya think?... wrote:

I wonder how that black lady (gender assumption?) feels about the systemic killing of unborn black children? I mean, those evil white conservatives have a lot of gall to be protesting for the right of those kids to be born.

What proportion, by race and class have abortions? I would have thought it would tend to be affluent who do it most.

But insofar as some poor and black people have abortions, they probably think it's a good thing, because they know they aren't in a position to raise them well.

About 52% of detected pregnancies among black women in the USA today end in a direct abortion. Of black children born, about 70% are to single mothers.

In 1960, when direct abortion was rare in the USA, the out-of-wedlock birthrate for black children was about 20%. The pelvic leftists of the mid- to late-1960s argued that artificial birth control would eliminate the "need" for abortion and lower the out-of-wedlock pregnancy rate. They were extraordinarily wrong.

Outraged wrote:

I'm not pro Kavanaugh at all. I'm not political at all. I'm witnessing this and meh-particitpating in discussion about it as neutrally as possible. I made a reply to a comment that stated Kavanaugh 'didn't prove he didn't do it' as some sort of evidence that he was guilty. Me, don't-give-a-F-about-anything-robot, simply stated that having to prove you didn't do something is not a viable way to determine truth. I know it's not a trial, that doesn't change the fact that it is a poor approach to determining guilt (maybe the legal system does it like this for a reason, huh?).

I give you the same advice. This is not a trial. I agree his response doesn't prove or disprove anything. HER testimoney DOES (to me). His response did prove (again, to me) that he is not fit to be on SCOTUS. I would even say he's even okay still being on the appeals court. His life isn't ruined.

are you honestly trying to claim no one every was convicted based on only one witness? Dude, are you still in HS? I would love to be that naive again.

and I hate to break the fantasy you've created for your white-male self but people are judged everyday based on accusations of others and their past behavior.

You also believe her testimony that she needed an extra room as an escape route due to panic attacks? Even though it was built as an add-on for use as a rental?

and cue the mocking her.

I had you figured out as an entitled white mail Trumper from the jump. Thanks for proving it.

the real atticus wrote:

Outraged wrote:

I'm not pro Kavanaugh at all. I'm not political at all. I'm witnessing this and meh-particitpating in discussion about it as neutrally as possible. I made a reply to a comment that stated Kavanaugh 'didn't prove he didn't do it' as some sort of evidence that he was guilty. Me, don't-give-a-F-about-anything-robot, simply stated that having to prove you didn't do something is not a viable way to determine truth. I know it's not a trial, that doesn't change the fact that it is a poor approach to determining guilt (maybe the legal system does it like this for a reason, huh?).

I give you the same advice. This is not a trial.

This talking point is comical... "It's not a trial... It's a job interview!" Oh, ok. That makes false accusations completely fair game... from now on, any candidate for any high-office, accusations will disqualify you. it's over... done. 'Cause, you know... "it's a job interview!"

And cue the insults...this is so predictable.