found this, pretty classic....you know with all those people who talked sh*t about how my dates where sooo off
"Successful cloning of the EPO gene in 1983 [5] allowed for the large-scale production of rhEPO and its subsequent clinical use"
and this is what i have been asking recently to you and all the OTHER so called EPO experts on here. natural EPO has a set molecular structure. rhEPO has DIFFERENT structures, thus would cause them to bind to DIFFERENT protein receptors in the CELLS or am i way off?
"Epoetins alfa and beta, both produced by Chinese hamster ovary cells, have minor structural differences but the same physiological effects"
well this was 2008 study, that LAST one i posted was from 2016? and it said there was NOTICEABLE mitochondrial CHANGES
scroll down to page 7, and see what i mean.
https://www.exphem.org/article/S0301-472X(08)00388-3/pdf
or this one, i didnt even try to browse it too much, but saw this and that was enough to think there is more in the research that again makes a POINT...NATURAL EPO and rhEPO have different abilities
"Human serum EPO emerged as a broad band after sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, with an apparent molecular weight slightly smaller than that of recombinant hEPO (rhEPO)"
http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/98/13/3626?sso-checked=true
but im sure this is all pointless cause its not what rekrunner thinks renato thinks