sc42 wrote:
a realist......... wrote:
Thank god. Maybe they can start growing some crops there. The world has a lot more mouths to feed than it did a couple hundred years ago.
OP, I repeat. Save your breath for talking to people who respect facts and logic. They do not work in Trumpyland.
Oh dear, they’ve got the lemmings all riled up again.
The lefties are scared again wrote:
Oh dear, they’ve got the lemmings all riled up again.
Lemmings are actually more aggressive and violent than many rodents, and their population can explode very quickly. So you’re predicting a Blue Wave? Dunno if I’d agree with that, but you’re entitled to your opinion.
Serious question for the climate alarmist. Wouldn't climate change be self correcting? If it actually does kill off half the population. Than there is only half the population to produce green house gasses. Therefore; emissions would be cut in half. Than it would be revered over time.
Lemon Lime 5000 metre runner wrote:
Serious question for the climate alarmist. Wouldn't climate change be self correcting? If it actually does kill off half the population. Than there is only half the population to produce green house gasses. Therefore; emissions would be cut in half. Than it would be revered over time.
I don't think the OP, or the linked article, mentioned anything about climate change killing off half the population. Are you maybe thinking of another thread?
Good, get rid of it and maybe we can focus on other problems like poverty and starvation.
The science is already settled. We can’t have new studies or research.
Lemon Lime 5000 metre runner wrote:
Serious question for the climate alarmist. Wouldn't climate change be self correcting? If it actually does kill off half the population. Than there is only half the population to produce green house gasses. Therefore; emissions would be cut in half. Than it would be revered over time.
That depends on the rates. It can’t be assumed just on mathematical principles. Half the population might still be enough to overwhelm the rate of reduction, and there are other factors like variation in use by area that need to be considered.
lkhj wrote:
Good, get rid of it and maybe we can focus on other problems like poverty and starvation.
‘Poverty’ and ‘’starvartion’ are fake news made up by China and the elites. Farmers just made up starvation because they have to sell food. Lemming. Sheeple.
See... it works for everything! No need to think anymore.
Except I just spend a couple of weeks in India, but I get your point.
sc42 wrote:
a realist......... wrote:
Thank god. Maybe they can start growing some crops there. The world has a lot more mouths to feed than it did a couple hundred years ago.
OP, I repeat. Save your breath for talking to people who respect facts and logic. They do not work in Trumpyland.
Hmm. Do you think you're intelligent? If so, explain what Trump has to do with anything here. This discussion/debate has been going on for decades. Trump has been a politician for a grand total of 3 years, if you start counting from the moment he declared his candidacy.
The rate of sea level rise due to Antarctic ice loss has tripled since 2012 alone
OH NOO. This is really bad news.
Time to move from the basement to the attic. I will have to wash dishes for a week so my mom allows me to move upstairs
Wonderin' wrote:
sc42 wrote:
OP, I repeat. Save your breath for talking to people who respect facts and logic. They do not work in Trumpyland.
Hmm. Do you think you're intelligent? If so, explain what Trump has to do with anything here. This discussion/debate has been going on for decades. Trump has been a politician for a grand total of 3 years, if you start counting from the moment he declared his candidacy.
Perhaps you do not know that a grand total of one nation in the world is out of the Paris accord , or perhaps you don’t know who removed that nation from the accord.
You can say it until you’re blue in the face but it is simply not correct that there is scientific debate over whether the global temperature is rising due to CO2.
There’s really no excuse other than stupidity for your stance, sorry.
+1
At the bottom of the article, it misstates there are 2.54mm in an inch (off by a factor of ten), then says 3 T tons would be be a 1" rise, contradicting previous statement. Makes one wonder if they know what they are saying.
It would be good if it got a bit warmer in Antarctica. Nobody can live there and nothing grows there because its literally too cold. If it warmed a bit then plants and forests could grow. There would be interesting wildlife and nature. It would look way nicer. I literally think it would turn the place into a better holiday destination and will be more accessable and a decent place to live. It could be like Norway maybe.
HRH wrote:
Maybe not:
https://climatechangedispatch.com/antarctica-still-doing-just-great-shock/
True, the Arctic and Greenland may very well have shrinking levels of Ice but Antarctica is doing the opposite.
It is forecast to get down to -63°c in a couple of days
https://www.timeanddate.com/weather/antarctica/south-poleSo no major worries.
OMG!!!! ?
The problem is that the leftist agenda driven scientists have been caught lying, and cherry picking so many times, that if we ever do get a real crisis, many will not believe them.
They are saying what they are being paid to say.
Scary global warming claim, and the grants keep coming.