Usain Bolt 9.58 100m WR could be in danger. (Serious topic)

why would you do that? instead its better to say im as bad as vent....

first i ran track from elementary, middle, high school and college.

not the "best" by any means but i did end my running with these PR's

10.77

21.97

47.68

i pulled my left hammy 2 times and my right hammy once. i had good form but still had weak as sh*t hammys

people with worse form blew their hammys up ALL the time. every one of them did the same christian coleman form. they never ever worked their hammys, it was always squats and cleans for them. the stronger they got the worse their form became and longer they were out when they pulled their hammys

but yeah tell me i dont know what im talking about

m!ndweak wrote:

i called it. sprintgeezer tried to mock me that i didnt know sh*t about sprinting

the way colemans leg cycles back through will be his downfall. fix that form or forever blow your hammy

Show us the thread.

In point of fact, it has been I (along with pretty much everyone else) who predicted Coleman being injured.

And whoever you are, the bs you post about external rotation being due exclusively to quad:ham imbalance seems to me to be laughable.

Also, Coleman will never come close to any time equivalent to Dolt’s wind-legal 9.58.

its not that hard sprint...but since EVERYONE on here seems to be so freaking lazy

hold on....oh my comments later on that thread were deleted cause i wasnt being nice to calculo/vent

Sprintgeezer wrote:

m!ndweak wrote:

i called it. sprintgeezer tried to mock me that i didnt know sh*t about sprinting

the way colemans leg cycles back through will be his downfall. fix that form or forever blow your hammy

Show us the thread.

In point of fact, it has been I (along with pretty much everyone else) who predicted Coleman being injured.

And whoever you are, the bs you post about external rotation being due exclusively to quad:ham imbalance seems to me to be laughable.

Also, Coleman will never come close to any time equivalent to Dolt’s wind-legal 9.58.

page 5 scroll down, right after i said he looks like wayne brady

and mock me as well....since you claim your the guru of sprinting. i swear this place is a bit much sometimes.

who are you? what makes you the AUTHORITY of all things sprinting?

i know what i ran, i ran with people who ran FAST, prob faster than you. but for some reason you want to tell me im wrong....ok have form like that and blow up your hammy fine, teach kids to run like that...whatever man

and before you spew your self righteous "im faster than anyone you know, but i dont have to prove it" speech

i ran with Demario Wesley while in junior college, as well as some other fast guys...maybe you heard of him, 10.19 in HS, and his high school still has the 4x100m record.

or call me out again so i go and PROVE it....thats the diff between me and all the other people on here that you, calculo/vent, rekrunner mock and insult and try to cyber bully.....im not intimidated by it.

sadly i used to think you were a knowledgeable person, but you are too arrogant for me to say i have your back anymore

Back to the point- it will be altitude so not the official world record.

I think wind aided and altitude should go. They don't have wind aided or altitude aided asterisks for home runs or field goals.

Simplify the sport.

runn wrote:

Back to the point- it will be altitude so not the official world record.

I think wind aided and altitude should go. They don't have wind aided or altitude aided asterisks for home runs or field goals.

Simplify the sport.

Alonso Edward ran 10.01 in that track today!!! with -0.7 headwind, after running a semifinal 5 hours earlier. I can't even imagine a race with +1.8 tailwind, without rounds. 9.90 probably.

Remember, Edward main event is 200m. This year, in 100m, his SB was 10.18 (-0.9) in Clermont, and you know that Clermont times and wind readings aren't "normal". Certainly that track gives you 0.2 advantage.

So, put Gatlin, Coleman (healthy), Prescod, Baker, Vicaut, etc in La Paz, even higher than Cochabamba, expect good weather, good wind readings, and see what happen...

runn wrote:

Back to the point- it will be altitude so not the official world record.

I think wind aided and altitude should go. They don't have wind aided or altitude aided asterisks for home runs or field goals.

Simplify the sport.

No, the IAAF does not differentiate between sea level records and records set at altitude. 100m and 200m world records were set at altitude in Mexico City. Pietro Mennea set a world 200m record at altitude on the same track. Calvin Smith set the 100m world record at altitude. Of course, Bob Beamon's incredible long jump was also set at altitude.

You might be thinking about UNOFFICIAL publications like Track & Field News that do differentiate.

And remember: there is no IAAF restriction on altitude; remember Jim Hines, Tommie Smith, Pietro Mennea and Lee Evans in Mexico City, Calvin Smith in Colorado Springs, MJ in Pretoria, Mike Powell in Sestriere (if not for the excessive tailwind)

Records set at high altitude venues are often marked with an "A" though that does not disqualify it as a record.

intenserunner wrote:

Just out of curiosity, you should lookup Dr. Bookspan and see what she has to say about this. She is a research scientist who studies and writes on this very topic and has written extensively on her website about this topic (ie. optimal foot orientation and how it relates to certain injuries)

I took a look but the online information seems to be somewhat poorly organized. I had done a bit of research on this when I was younger when I was competing in college as I noticed most people had knees that pointed in the same direction as their feet. Some people said it was due to weak hips and such but after some discussion with my trainer we concluded that it was not fixable.

An example of a professional runner with a similar turned-out foot is Kirani James. If you google his images you can see very clearly that his feet are not aligned with his knees, rather than having his entire leg rotated outwards (which would indeed be a sign of muscular imbalance).

Alex Quinonez from Ecuador ran 19.93 (-0.5) today.

His PB was 20.14 (-0.2) 5 weeks ago.

We need Noah Lyles in this track NOW. Or even higher, in La Paz track. 19.3x potential.

Oh, I forgot, his PB was 20.14...in...yes...you guessed it...Clermont!!!