DHT123 wrote:
That's why I'm more interested in looking at contradictions in her accounts of events leading up to her tests. And so for 2012, I think it is very likely that when the test result came back, even though Paula said she was at altitude, the panel still thought that it was 'likely doping' and it was only then that she said that she was also 'injured and not running' whilst she was at the training camp.......and therefore being able to show that this was not the case (if indeed, it wasn't the case) would be very significant.
I see. Well at best (for her), that would concern only the last few days, clearly not the whole camp. Also note that two of those reports were from February and July 2012, respectively, so her Jan-28 issue can't have been too severe.
This anti-transparency philosophy is quite annoying. I wonder why the IAAF won't ever release the experts' final review.