The heading of the OP is wrong. She didn't forge anything.
When I first saw that photo, it was clear to me that it was a note added in likely the owner of the yearbook's handwriting. There's no attempt to emulate Moore's handwriting style. It no different than me sometimes saving old race numbers and writing in the date, my time, and place on it.
Runningart2004 wrote:
What about the other 5 accusers? This one added notes, but still stands by her story.
There’s too much smoke for something not to be on fire. If you have one accuser then maybe that can be dismissed....but there are 6.
Same with Trump and his dozen or so sexual harassment/assault accusers.
Facts are many voters would rather have a suspected pedophile, or sexual harassment/assault perpetrator than someone of the opposite party.
Alan
What's wrong with him being a suspected pedophile or harasser? Suspected does not mean he actually did it. What you are saying is that if you have been accused of something (even falsely) then you shouldn't be in office. That makes no sense.
Your other point about people rathering not electing a member of the other party is how it SHOULD be. Being in office is about making policies. Party affiliation determines policies not accusations of sexual misconduct. These people should be praised for their maturity to put the issues above these accusations. These accusations are irrelevant to Moore's ability to be a politician and not make laws that the voters want.
Next, the number of people claiming something does not determine if that thing is true or false. You are a proponent of mob mentality.
Next, I have seen no evidence that Moore is a pedophile. Why are you accusing him of being one?
Breitbart has so little credibility with me. When I see something there, I look for other sources.
Every other story I read points out she added the note. That does not alter what was written above it.
Would love to have several handwriting experts take a look. This seems simple enough.
Is it irony or hypocrisy that Breitbart is printing fake news?
If your going to forge something at least try to match ink color.
Nope, you're lying again.
It's all one color. That picture is taken from severe angle, and shows severe chromatic-aberration distortion of the actual page, which looks like this:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DQjE9vOVAAAcVAr.jpg
What you're doing is a desperate attempt by right-wing scumbags to distract from the real story. But you dip-sh*ts know that already, don't you?
Be honest, for once in your lives. Yes, he's child-molester and rapist. But you want him in the Senate anyway, because he hates black people, like you do.
Tell the truth. You'll be able to feel a tiny bit better about yourselves.
Just because Roy Moore likes to diddle little girls does not mean he is the devil. Politicians are people, too.
Regardless of the pedo allegations which are true. He has admitted too spending time with these girls.
This guys still believes the bible should be the ruling document of the country. How can people still be supporting these types of fundamentalist fanatics? If he was a Muslim he would be the poster boy for ISIS.
Everything he stands for is a direct contradiction of the 1st amendment.
libs are liars wrote:
Liberals can't stop lying and deceiving. It's in their genes.
So, let's see:
1) She didn't forge anything--that is, she didn't represent the part that she had written as having been written by someone else.
2) Breitbart's headline was intentionally misleading (the definition of a lie), with the knowledge that a lot of its "readers" (I use the term loosely) would only look at the headline and then move on, deceived into thinking that she had made up the yearbook inscription--and, by extension, the entire accusation.
Lying and deception--DAMN those liberals at Breitbart!
Breitbart Simpson wrote:
Is it irony or hypocrisy that Breitbart is printing fake news?
Huh?? That's their business model!
Regulations wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
What about the other 5 accusers? This one added notes, but still stands by her story.
There’s too much smoke for something not to be on fire. If you have one accuser then maybe that can be dismissed....but there are 6.
Same with Trump and his dozen or so sexual harassment/assault accusers.
Facts are many voters would rather have a suspected pedophile, or sexual harassment/assault perpetrator than someone of the opposite party.
Alan
Does the US Army allow its soldiers to criticize the Commander In Chief on a public forum like this ?
Yes it does actually.
If he had a picture of him in uniform as a profile pic or his user name was something that indicated he was military then it could be questioned.
Why did she add the initials of Roy Moore's assistant Delbra Adams after his signature? I've never seen a good explanation for that.
logicals wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
What about the other 5 accusers? This one added notes, but still stands by her story.
There’s too much smoke for something not to be on fire. If you have one accuser then maybe that can be dismissed....but there are 6.
Same with Trump and his dozen or so sexual harassment/assault accusers.
Facts are many voters would rather have a suspected pedophile, or sexual harassment/assault perpetrator than someone of the opposite party.
Alan
What's wrong with him being a suspected pedophile or harasser? Suspected does not mean he actually did it. What you are saying is that if you have been accused of something (even falsely) then you shouldn't be in office. That makes no sense.
Your other point about people rathering not electing a member of the other party is how it SHOULD be. Being in office is about making policies. Party affiliation determines policies not accusations of sexual misconduct. These people should be praised for their maturity to put the issues above these accusations. These accusations are irrelevant to Moore's ability to be a politician and not make laws that the voters want.
Next, the number of people claiming something does not determine if that thing is true or false. You are a proponent of mob mentality.
Next, I have seen no evidence that Moore is a pedophile. Why are you accusing him of being one?
Let me clarify then....
If 6 people accuse you of the same thing then it’s highly likely at least one of those instances are true.
In another way....
Cosby, Weinstein, O’Reilly, Franken, Franks, Moore, Trump, Lauer.......none of these people have been found guilty in a court of law. We are assuming guilt based on the number accusations.
Armstrong, Jones, Bonds, McGuire....never tested positive either...
More importantly, politicians are in a position of trust. If that trust is then questioned by numerous accusations their ability to effectively do their job is impacted.
Alan
If she did, I have no idea why. I'd assume that meant "District Attorney,' and was meant to show that he was a real big shot, but I don't know.
Here's what matters, Einstein.
1. He didn't even freaking DENY the allegations initially. He gave some mealy-mouthed bullsh*t about how he 'always asked for the mothers' permission.' (Which is *also* a lie, of course.)
2. He didn't even DENY the inscription in the yearbook was his, you pinhead. He said 'we're not sure *all* that text is from Roy.' (In other words, they knew she probably added the time and date, and thought, 'Hey, maybe we can use that to try to pretend the whole thing is somehow fraudulent.')
(Why not? There's a lot of really stupid people on LetsRun who'll buy it, no problem.)
3. It's been common knowledge, all around the area, for freaking *decades* that this low-life a**hole had a major thing for teenage girls.
4. ALL these women tell near identical stories, they all told others about it at the time (who corroborate it now), they're all freaking Republicans for Chrissake, you freaking idiot,... and they all exposed themselves to horrible abuse to come forward and tell their stories.
Which part of this story is too complex for you tiny-brained imbeciles to grasp?
Tell the truth: you KNOW he's *clearly* a child-molester and (at the very least *attempted*) rapist, but you don't care, because he hates black people like you do, so he's your hero.
Stand up like a man, and tell the freaking truth, for once in your life.
How is this a "BombShell"?
Everyone not inside the MSM echo bubble already this was 100% FAKE in the first place.
Tamperer wrote:
Everyone not inside the MSM echo bubble already this was 100% FAKE in the first place.
But the part about his being removed as a judge--twice--is not fake, and not debated.
I believe he'll be elected, not in spite of the actions that cost him his judgeship but because of them; but there's no denying that he has consistently failed to follow the Constitution or the rule of law.
Should someone like that be in Congress?
Then there should be other instances of Roy Moore signing his name that way. Are there? I don't know.
You sure seem like you're making lots of unfounded assumptions. You're trying to lynch someone without proof. Lynch. Your lynch mob mentality is not what is needed in the political environment we have now. Look what you've incited already. Have you forgotton about the attempted assassination of politicians at the baseball field in Virginia so soon?
Sorry, Pal, I'm all out of time to devote to educating dimwits today. I've done my part.
Have a great weekend.
Quitter
Russian trolls on Letsrun...
Don't get angry. Let's just meet Russia in the parking lot and crush their 1980's tin tank military.
Johnsons' should be ashamed for letting them on here.
