The classic mistake of hiring a middle of the road candidate who is an alum instead of someone who is truly great. With the heritage, location, recruiting, academics, PAC-12 competition, etc etc etc, there is no reason UCLA couldn't have attracted the very best.
SC! wrote:
ucla is a cesspool of public funding and elitist darlings.
USC is where true academic, research, and education occurs.
Yes, but who has the hottest cheerleaders?
Theriot wrote:
The classic mistake of hiring a middle of the road candidate who is an alum instead of someone who is truly great. With the heritage, location, recruiting, academics, PAC-12 competition, etc etc etc, there is no reason UCLA couldn't have attracted the very best.
Um...they weren't willing to pay what it was going to take to attract the very best. All the other "bigger name" name candidates turned them down because of such a low salary & paltry budget.
Um...they weren't willing to pay what it was going to take to attract the very best. All the other "bigger name" name candidates turned them down because of such a low salary & paltry budget
The above is spot on!!!
Read more:
http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=8327610&page=1#ixzz4psN7shJD
Buy your shoes from LetsRun and save 20% everday
Did they lose the thrower Braheme Days too? They updated the roster to remove Benjamin and Viltz, but Days isn't there anymore.