Here's the correct link:
http://www.businessinsider.com/lance-armstrong-doping-tour-de-france-2015-1
Here's the correct link:
http://www.businessinsider.com/lance-armstrong-doping-tour-de-france-2015-1
oh please wrote:
Lance is the legitimate winner from 1999 to 2005. It was a level playing field.
If you want to call it Entertainment Wrestling with a manufactured plot, sure, they were legitimate only in that the story, as designed and produced attracted an audience.
Legitimate as a sport? no.
And no, it wasn't a level playing field. USPS had a substantial "tailwind" with USA Cycling, the UCI, and ASO supporting them in various ways.
If you think froome is legit, well, that's going to end badly for you too.
oh please wrote:
Lance is the legitimate winner from 1999 to 2005. It was a level playing field.
I don't know how that could be considered a level playing field when he won "7" in a row. I think there was something fishy going on other than the expensive Ferrari doping program. And we're seeing the same thing repeat itself with Froome & the Sky machine...something fishy is going on here ðŸŸ
but why wrote:
I don't believe this but Outside Magazine gave Lance Armstrong a blog and podcast for TdF - why are people still giving this man any money or attention?
https://www.outsideonline.com/2197087/lance-armstrong-returns-tour
He has paid his penalty plain and simple.
Why does he get to blog and podcast? Simple he has superior knowledge and understands every facet of the sport, training, racing, politics, drugs, everything its takes to win and or loose.
Wether you like it or not, he can help the sport.
Better question... who cares?