rekrunner wrote:
My question, from the very initial BBC Panorama and ProPublica reports, from Epstein, Marc Daly, Magness and the Gouchers, is not directed at truthfulness, but, taking 100% truthfulness for granted, where is the anti-doping rule violation of an athlete subject to anti-doping rules?
Kara promised us a day of reckoning, based on details not made public but shared with USADA.
Yet here we are, two years later, and the best angle seems to be challenging Alberto's need for testosterone, despite notes from doctors and pharmacists, and alleged infusions that USADA has determined must have exceeded the allowable 50ml infusions. You called this the equivalent of a parking ticket - it still is. (For some reason, I prefer the analogy of "jaywalking".)
My opinion then, was that USADA's only possible course of actions were:
- Turn over evidence to appropriate state, federal, or international authorities, and help facilitate or assist in any investigations in the right jurisdictions
- Lobby WADA to make thyroid, L-carnitine prohibited substances, or somehow make prescription drug abuse a prohibited method
After five years of targeted investigation and testing, and voluntary co-operation from at least 19 former Nike athletes and employees, USADA chasing after 50ml infusions seems to be a desparate act and a tacit admission that they have nothing better.
I'm convinced that USADA didn't leak this report on purpose, because it seems to be 269 pages of embarrassingly little substance confirming an actual anti-doping rule violation ever took place.
The initial BBC Panorama and ProPublica reports were equally premature, sparking a conversation among a population who still doesn't fully understand that thyroid medication never required a TUE, and that L-carnitine is as legal, in all quantities, as a juicy steak.
rojo wrote:...
Everything he has said has actually been proven to be true. The more that we learn, the more we learn why he was suspicious about what was going on.
...