It is easy to make up a lie and then challenge people to prove it didn't happen.
It is easy to make up a lie and then challenge people to prove it didn't happen.
false impression wrote:
It is easy to make up a lie and then challenge people to prove it didn't happen.
+1
"Scientists" haven been proven to only look at the "facts" that they think support their claim. It's funny to see them hem and haw when presented with the true word that destroys their arguments.
Was the Great Flood climate or weather?
Science Debunked wrote:
false impression wrote:It is easy to make up a lie and then challenge people to prove it didn't happen.
+1
"Scientists" haven been proven to only look at the "facts" that they think support their claim. It's funny to see them hem and haw when presented with the true word that destroys their arguments.
fal wrote:
Science Debunked wrote:+1
"Scientists" haven been proven to only look at the "facts" that they think support their claim. It's funny to see them hem and haw when presented with the true word that destroys their arguments.
ooops.
That is why it is important for peer-review and that scientific research be repeatable.
The Bible, not so much.
Science Debunked wrote:
false impression wrote:It is easy to make up a lie and then challenge people to prove it didn't happen.
+1
"Scientists" haven been proven to only look at the "facts" that they think support their claim. It's funny to see them hem and haw when presented with the true word that destroys their arguments.
An obvious troll, however it did remind me of someone I met once who genuinely believed this. Made a lasting impression about how vulnerable the human mind is.
false impression wrote:
fal wrote:ooops.
That is why it is important for peer-review and that scientific research be repeatable.
The Bible, not so much.
Peer review by people who believe the same falsehoods?
How does "science" repeat dinosaurs and man living at the same time? Lol
Science Debunked wrote:
false impression wrote:ooops.
That is why it is important for peer-review and that scientific research be repeatable.
The Bible, not so much.
Peer review by people who believe the same falsehoods?
How does "science" repeat dinosaurs and man living at the same time? Lol
You may wish to Google "Dunning-Kruger Effect" and seek some assistance.
Litter Ali wrote:
Pascal, Blaise wrote:+1
That is what I say to Protestants who take everything literal in the Bible.
"literally"
I bow down to your omniscience, good sir.
Lots of evidence wrote:
JC on a TRex wrote:Why would dinosaur fossils need to be "planted" then?
What makes you think they are "planted."
The Creationists.
Science Debunked wrote:
It's funny how people make light of things like this, yet can never come up with any evidence or coherent argument to the contrary.
If your grasp on reality is so tenuous that you actually believe that a 900 year old man made a boat capable of holding two of every species of animal or that humans and dinosaurs lived together then what are the chances of some random internet person being able to educate you?
At some point you become too idiotic for the effort to be worth it and the only productive thing to do is to mock you in hopes that other people see you for the horrible example that they don't want to become.
Science Debunked wrote:
It's funny how people make light of things like this, yet can never come up with any evidence or coherent argument to the contrary.
Son, just because you can't understand things doesn't mean they are not coherent arguments. Your mind was just closed after the brainwashing.
Pascal, Blaise wrote:
Litter Ali wrote:"literally"
I bow down to your omniscience, good sir.
No need.
The point is that you will probably do better in your future communications. As a result, people will think more highly of you.
You are welcome.
Sloetry in Motion wrote:
Science Debunked wrote:It's funny how people make light of things like this, yet can never come up with any evidence or coherent argument to the contrary.
If your grasp on reality is so tenuous that you actually believe that a 900 year old man made a boat capable of holding two of every species of animal or that humans and dinosaurs lived together then what are the chances of some random internet person being able to educate you?
At some point you become too idiotic for the effort to be worth it and the only productive thing to do is to mock you in hopes that other people see you for the horrible example that they don't want to become.
If you read the history, he did not take two of every animal on Earth at that time. He didn't need to. Also, he was only 600 when he built the Ark.
when you can't refute the truth, attack the person.
JC on a TRex wrote:
Science Debunked wrote:It's funny how people make light of things like this, yet can never come up with any evidence or coherent argument to the contrary.
Son, just because you can't understand things doesn't mean they are not coherent arguments. Your mind was just closed after the brainwashing.
My mind is open. Yours is the one closed to the truth.
Science Debunked wrote:
JC on a TRex wrote:Son, just because you can't understand things doesn't mean they are not coherent arguments. Your mind was just closed after the brainwashing.
My mind is open. Yours is the one closed to the truth.
Convincing, Kirk.
Jkj wrote:
It may be outlandish, but folks do go and believe it.
Your Vice President and AG are two of them.
Which only proves you don't need any critical thinking skills to have a very bigly career in politics.
Science Debunked wrote:
Sloetry in Motion wrote:If your grasp on reality is so tenuous that you actually believe that a 900 year old man made a boat capable of holding two of every species of animal or that humans and dinosaurs lived together then what are the chances of some random internet person being able to educate you?
At some point you become too idiotic for the effort to be worth it and the only productive thing to do is to mock you in hopes that other people see you for the horrible example that they don't want to become.
If you read the history, he did not take two of every animal on Earth at that time. He didn't need to. Also, he was only 600 when he built the Ark.
when you can't refute the truth, attack the person.
Why would I bother trying to educate you? I'd rather spend my time doing something with a better likelihood of success like teaching calculus to a cat or showing some shrubbery how to line dance. So instead I mock you, which usually takes some effort, but is made much easier when all I have to do is point out that you think "he was only 600 years old when he built the Ark" is a reasonable retort.
You serve as an example. You're the guy on the street corner waving the sign and yelling about the end of the world who makes people feel uncomfortable when they walk by. You're the guy on social media who won't stop talking about contrails and an inside job on 9/11 even though no one bothers to respond anymore. You're the raving prisoner behind bars on a scared straight tv show. You exist so the rest of us can point at you when we bend down to bluntly ask a child "Is THIS how you want to end up?"
So let me encourage you: Be loud, be proud. Tell everyone exactly what you believe and spare no detail. Every word you utter will serve as a reminder of just how blurry and moveable the line is that attempts to separate fundamentalist religious belief from mental illness.
Sloetry in Motion wrote:
Science Debunked wrote:If you read the history, he did not take two of every animal on Earth at that time. He didn't need to. Also, he was only 600 when he built the Ark.
when you can't refute the truth, attack the person.
Why would I bother trying to educate you? I'd rather spend my time doing something with a better likelihood of success like teaching calculus to a cat or showing some shrubbery how to line dance. So instead I mock you, which usually takes some effort, but is made much easier when all I have to do is point out that you think "he was only 600 years old when he built the Ark" is a reasonable retort.
You serve as an example. You're the guy on the street corner waving the sign and yelling about the end of the world who makes people feel uncomfortable when they walk by. You're the guy on social media who won't stop talking about contrails and an inside job on 9/11 even though no one bothers to respond anymore. You're the raving prisoner behind bars on a scared straight tv show. You exist so the rest of us can point at you when we bend down to bluntly ask a child "Is THIS how you want to end up?"
So let me encourage you: Be loud, be proud. Tell everyone exactly what you believe and spare no detail. Every word you utter will serve as a reminder of just how blurry and moveable the line is that attempts to separate fundamentalist religious belief from mental illness.
All you had to say is that you are unable to disprove anything I've stated. It would have been much easier.
Science Debunked wrote:
All you had to say is that you are unable to disprove anything I've stated. It would have been much easier.
That some guy built a boat to hold two of every animal and the entire earth flooded? It could happen.