Trollminator wrote:
Fine this MFer and toss him in jail already
Why do that when you can just charge him under a statutory law that doesn’t exist? it’s fun to watch the disease fester
-
12
-
Sally Vix wrote:
Trump has conducted business in NYC for 60 years. Not one indictment from a slew of partisan liberal DAs.
Do yourself a favor. Google
1. Trump catch and kill
2. Michael Cohen -Trump fixer
3. Where my Roy Cohen?
4. Was Trump always a Republican?
you will stop embarrassing yourself with this dumb retort
10 -
Sally Vix wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
You can blame trump for breaking laws in NY then. He was well aware of the risks. Assuming even a small minority of 10% in NYC that like trump (a lot of damn people!), you can bet your a$ his defense combed through that jury pool to find at least 6 of them. Regardless, they will be instructed to consider the evidence and the law - all it takes is one sympathetic juror who doesn't buy it to get a hung jury. Even in NYC that is not a high bar if indeed the charges are BS and lacking evidence like you claim it is. But your lack of conviction tells me you know he's a fkn crook and you just don't like that he's going to be facing any consequences. It's sad you worship this POS so much.
Trump has conducted business in NYC for 60 years. Not one indictment from a slew of partisan liberal DAs.
You are a moron.
31 -
Sally Vix wrote:
4:20 is not that fast wrote:
The joke is that it will ultimately become a penny stock.
When my stake in it is worth $25 million, I will laugh remembering your penny stock comment.
You are a moron.
21 -
24
-
LMAO!
Trump: The gag order has to come off. I should be allowed to speak… I have to be released from the gag order. They have taken away my constitutional right to speak and that includes speaking to you. I have a lot to say to you and I’m not allowed to say it
30 -
Better term wrote:
I'm often surprised and impressed with how often the correct letsrun spelling IS used.
00 -
Sally Vix wrote:
this is it wrote:
lol
This is a serious matter and you are finding it funny?
Let me guess, you have the funny and non-funny parts confused. It's NOT funny that it is accurate to label him as a Hitler pig. It is, arguably, funny that some - even in the White House - (accurately) refer to him this way.
There's an expression for it, I think. That's right, "Lie in the bed you made."
"Hey boss, how about we write in 'vermin' and 'poisoning the blood' in tonight's speech to the mouth breathers?"
"Absolutely!"
"But we'll whine mightily later if anyone calls us Hitler, right?"
"Absolutely!"
20 -
Noyankee wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Fine this MFer and toss him in jail already
Why do that when you can just charge him under a statutory law that doesn’t exist? it’s fun to watch the disease fester
I watched a youtube vid this morning about Melania suing The View. 15 or more minutes, and mentioning several times that Trump is being charged in Manhattan under a law that does not exist and on trial with a bogus judge and prosecutor and a broken justice system. Online, I cannot find anything about Melania suing The View apart from this youtube and the tiktok version of the same. My conclusion is that this is not good analysis, and just might be fake. It seemed short on specifics. I do seem to be able to find legal documents and analysis online that supports these being real charges making their way through a justice system slowly in many steps. Who to believe?
Hmmm. John Edwards was prosecuted (federally) for very similar charges and the result was a hung jury. Perhaps because he continued to send money to the woman (who was having a child with him) after the election. Thus the case was made that Edwards' motive was not so much election interference as supporting the woman and his child. And that prosecutor was... a fresh-faced young 'mad dog' named Jack Smith. Real charges or charges that do not exist? Hmmm.
12 -
Drowsy Diaper Don Snoreleone can’t even manage to avoid dozing off before noon. Sad!
50 -
Yessiree Bob wrote:
Drowsy Diaper Don Snoreleone can’t even manage to avoid dozing off before noon. Sad!
New York Times? Fake News! (It's behind a paywall for me.)
I'll get my legal coverage from Deep State Operative and former #2 from the Manhattan DA's office Karen Friedman Agnifilo.
00 -
Biden takes heat over gaffe urging Americans to 'choose freedom over democracy:' 'Get this man out of office!'
'Dems really need to upgrade his OS or something...' one prominent journalist wrote about Biden on X33 -
Just so we're clear:
-- When the judge issues a Parker Warning to the defendant (as is standard practice in a trial like DJT's and which Judge Merchan therefore issued to DJT), it is not evidence of a "corrupt" judge or of a "show trial" (no matter what kind of disingenuous nonsense Elise Stefanik wants to spout on social media). In fact, it is simply appropriate action for the proceedings.
-- When it is common practice to allow 10 strikes in jury selection for both the people and the defense, and when all parties are apprised of that in advance, they should not expect to have "unlimited" strikes available to them (no matter what kind of disingenuous nonsense DJT spouts on social media). This is, instead, equal treatment under the law.
-- If a gag order is in effect according to principles firmly established and in accordance with the law, anyone under the gag order is expected to comply with it or face legal consequences. If the defense has problems with the gag order, the appropriate recourse is to issue a challenge to the gag order in lieu of violating it. Under such circumstances, the issuance of the gag order and any punishment arising from it are not violations of a defendant's constitutional rights (no matter what disingenuous nonsense DJT and any of his toadies want to spout on social media or in front of a camera).
50 -
Just so we are clear wrote:
Just so we're clear:
-- When the judge issues a Parker Warning to the defendant (as is standard practice in a trial like DJT's and which Judge Merchan therefore issued to DJT), it is not evidence of a "corrupt" judge or of a "show trial" (no matter what kind of disingenuous nonsense Elise Stefanik wants to spout on social media). In fact, it is simply appropriate action for the proceedings.
-- When it is common practice to allow 10 strikes in jury selection for both the people and the defense, and when all parties are apprised of that in advance, they should not expect to have "unlimited" strikes available to them (no matter what kind of disingenuous nonsense DJT spouts on social media). This is, instead, equal treatment under the law.
-- If a gag order is in effect according to principles firmly established and in accordance with the law, anyone under the gag order is expected to comply with it or face legal consequences. If the defense has problems with the gag order, the appropriate recourse is to issue a challenge to the gag order in lieu of violating it. Under such circumstances, the issuance of the gag order and any punishment arising from it are not violations of a defendant's constitutional rights (no matter what disingenuous nonsense DJT and any of his toadies want to spout on social media or in front of a camera).
"Parker Warning"?
"Slow down, you're lapping too many Division I women."
10 -
Yessiree Bob wrote:
Drowsy Diaper Don Snoreleone can’t even manage to avoid dozing off before noon. Sad!
This lines up rather consistently with the intel folks having to (REALLY?) dumb down his briefings, and.......pretty much everything else that we've learned about his habits as a "chief executive."
It's pretty easy to imagine John Kelly REALLY wanting to talk to him like you would a 13-year old boy: "Hey boss, ENOUGH with you still being on your phone at 2am and then dozing off during your intel briefing, DAMN IT ALL !!!"
Sorry, I forgot, he's a fake billionaire and had a TV show. He SHOULD have been the most powerful person in the world.
20 -
Nnonequals wrote:
Just so we are clear wrote:
Just so we're clear:
-- When the judge issues a Parker Warning to the defendant (as is standard practice in a trial like DJT's and which Judge Merchan therefore issued to DJT), it is not evidence of a "corrupt" judge or of a "show trial" (no matter what kind of disingenuous nonsense Elise Stefanik wants to spout on social media). In fact, it is simply appropriate action for the proceedings.
-- When it is common practice to allow 10 strikes in jury selection for both the people and the defense, and when all parties are apprised of that in advance, they should not expect to have "unlimited" strikes available to them (no matter what kind of disingenuous nonsense DJT spouts on social media). This is, instead, equal treatment under the law.
-- If a gag order is in effect according to principles firmly established and in accordance with the law, anyone under the gag order is expected to comply with it or face legal consequences. If the defense has problems with the gag order, the appropriate recourse is to issue a challenge to the gag order in lieu of violating it. Under such circumstances, the issuance of the gag order and any punishment arising from it are not violations of a defendant's constitutional rights (no matter what disingenuous nonsense DJT and any of his toadies want to spout on social media or in front of a camera).
"Parker Warning"?
"Slow down, you're lapping too many Division I women."
"Parker Warning II" ?
"STOP talking about your cross-training. Women getting lapped by you who are running 7 days a week and twice your mileage DON'T want to hear that they're being destroyed by a virtually part-time runner."
(....and YES, it DOES make it even worse to many of them that you're well-above-average attractive!")
01 -
Just so we are clear wrote:
Just so we're clear:
-- When the judge issues a Parker Warning to the defendant (as is standard practice in a trial like DJT's and which Judge Merchan therefore issued to DJT), it is not evidence of a "corrupt" judge or of a "show trial" (no matter what kind of disingenuous nonsense Elise Stefanik wants to spout on social media). In fact, it is simply appropriate action for the proceedings.
-- When it is common practice to allow 10 strikes in jury selection for both the people and the defense, and when all parties are apprised of that in advance, they should not expect to have "unlimited" strikes available to them (no matter what kind of disingenuous nonsense DJT spouts on social media). This is, instead, equal treatment under the law.
-- If a gag order is in effect according to principles firmly established and in accordance with the law, anyone under the gag order is expected to comply with it or face legal consequences. If the defense has problems with the gag order, the appropriate recourse is to issue a challenge to the gag order in lieu of violating it. Under such circumstances, the issuance of the gag order and any punishment arising from it are not violations of a defendant's constitutional rights (no matter what disingenuous nonsense DJT and any of his toadies want to spout on social media or in front of a camera).
Our boy is also very concerned about this case since he was on social media this morning ranting about him deserving presidential immunity.
20
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun