Sally Vix wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
seattle prattle wrote:
if trump is better for the market, that is a short sighted view. He pushes for very immediate returns at the expense of long term solid fundamentals, and it will most certainly come to bite us eventually. In a nutshell, Trump is not doing you any favors. Far from it, and he is screwing a lot of the population over, not to mention future generations, if that is any concern to you at all.
It is not just me who thinks Trump is better for the market. Look at how the market has done even in the face of this terrible Coronavirus pandemic. The Dow went down to about 18,500 or so. And the other two major indices are at or close to all-time highs. So those who make a living off the stock market are thinking about long-term solid fundamentals. It is not like back in 2000 when the market was inevitably going to collapse. Stock prices are related to future expected returns. So, just about everyone who makes a living on the stock market is expecting the market to continue doing well, EVEN WITH this pandemic.
Terrible Coronavirus pandemic?!? WTF are you talking about? I have heard it repeatedly from an authoritative source that the whole thing is a hoax and a gross over-reaction to what, maybe 300 deaths?
Can't recall the name of the poster who let us all know that but let me think about it for a minute, it'll come to me. Wait a minute, maybe you could help me out here. Do you remember who it was that told us all "no big deal - it's ridiculous how we are over-reacting to 300 deaths"?
Not sure who that was, . .
Let me give you a hint. Their handle started with "Sally" and ended with "Vix". Let's see if that's enough to jog your memory.
Okay, you were obviously not graduated at the top of your class. Not "their' but "his" or "her" handle ....