Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Trump hates black people so much he has created an economy that has resulted in the LOWEST black unemployment rate in history. Also, he hates Jewish people including his son-in-law, daughter and grand kids.
How's that recession working out for ya?
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/wEPdAbtLA5k/maxresdefault.jpgKAG2020
You're so f'ing dumb, and a coward racist wanker too.
industry insiders wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Scientific findings must be repeatable...
Which makes every single counter-science claim by conservatives disreputable.
Mann, like so many other global warming researchers, seems to have something of an issue with the scientific principle of reproducibility--that others ought to be able to re-create the work. It speaks volumes about scientific credibility, none of it favorable to the IPCC crowd.
Science shares data and doesn't care where it leads, it seeks truth. Global warming is a cult.
Trollminator wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Trump hates black people so much he has created an economy that has resulted in the LOWEST black unemployment rate in history. Also, he hates Jewish people including his son-in-law, daughter and grand kids.
How's that recession working out for ya?
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/wEPdAbtLA5k/maxresdefault.jpgKAG2020
The unemployment rate has been falling steadily since shortly after Obama took office - so try to keep up. Besides riding Obama’s strong economy he added trillions to the debt ceiling as unnecessary stimulus to try to outdo Obama’s avg annual GDP growth and it has had just a marginal impact. If you had been following the mkts recently instead of his tweets, you’d know that GDP has been weakening so I wouldn’t be parading Trump as an economic success story just yet...
You make a mistake assuming that Rigged pays attention to anything other than what Trump tells him. Rigged knows nothing of the economy or trends or anything other than what Trump's balls taste like. He's an idiot racist wanker.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Oh, how about Obama's drone strikes which killed civilians as well as US citizens?
It’s admirable that you are speaking up against the murder of civilians by the US. No doubt your consistency will alter your support for the current administration.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/30/opinion/drones-civilian-casulaties-trump-obama.htmlRigged for Hillary wrote:
industry insiders wrote:
Which makes every single counter-science claim by conservatives disreputable.
Mann, like so many other global warming researchers, seems to have something of an issue with the scientific principle of reproducibility--that others ought to be able to re-create the work. It speaks volumes about scientific credibility, none of it favorable to the IPCC crowd.
Science shares data and doesn't care where it leads, it seeks truth. Global warming is a cult.
You are a dumb@ss.
Calyope wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
The unemployment rate has been falling steadily since shortly after Obama took office - so try to keep up. Besides riding Obama’s strong economy he added trillions to the debt ceiling as unnecessary stimulus to try to outdo Obama’s avg annual GDP growth and it has had just a marginal impact. If you had been following the mkts recently instead of his tweets, you’d know that GDP has been weakening so I wouldn’t be parading Trump as an economic success story just yet...
You make a mistake assuming that Rigged pays attention to anything other than what Trump tells him. Rigged knows nothing of the economy or trends or anything other than what Trump's balls taste like. He's an idiot racist wanker.
Name calling is not an argument. Troll harder.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
reproducibility--that others ought to be able to re-create the work.
No one has been able to reproduce a single fake claim made by Trump.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Name calling is not an argument. Troll harder.
ROFLOL . . . so cries the #1 name caller on this thread.
Your trolling score is -10/10.
Ummm... it was posted on the bottom of p.3380 by another poster.
Fat hurts wrote:
Very surprised nobody has mentioned this one yet. It looks like Tiny has ordered the military to start flying C-17's to Prestwick airport and having the crew stay overnight at his Turnberry property. For now, the military is refusing to turn over documents to congress about it. And for now, we don't know if Tiny was directly involved. But I'm betting Tiny said something like, "You know general, Prestwick would be a great place to refuel. And the crew could stay at Turnberry. Of course, it's entirely up to you."
Both Turnberry and the airport that serves his property have been struggling financially.
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/06/air-force-trump-scottish-retreat-1484337
It's been posted wrote:
Ummm... it was posted on the bottom of p.3380 by another poster.
So.
Sally Vixxxxxxxxxins wrote:
Eva Hearda wrote:
Ever heard of Mar-a-Lago?
Ever heard of Trump's private 757 JUMBO ? Configured to seat less than 50 in a plane made to seat ~250 people. Trump's has gold-plated toilets.
Trump is not a hypocrite like all the rich Hollywood people and the rich politicians. He doesn't talk about Global Warming and how it will ruin the Earth and then go fly in a private jet. He knows Global Warming is the biggest scientific hoax ever so he has no problem riding in a private jet. He knows that the Earth has gone through warming and cooling periods in its history. He understands that we will be entering a cooling phase in the not-too-distant-future. He is not a phony like the liberals who talk about tipping points and what we must do (spend trillions of tax dollars) to save the EArth.
So you’d rather believe and trust in a guy who thinks exercise shortens one’s life?
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
It's not a side. It's science.
Scientific findings must be repeatable: refusing to provide the underlying data is tantamount to confirmation that the findings are not repeatable. Michael Mann is a fraud who has perpetuated a falsehood. That is NOT science. It is a hoax.
The basics of global warming and climate change have been verified and reverified over and over and over for more than a century.
The scientific community overwhelmingly accepts anthropogenic global warming.
Given that fact, there are three possibilities:
1) The scientific community is made up of stupid people.
2) The scientific community is engaged in a global conspiracy.
3) The scientific community is made up of smart people who know how to do their jobs and are therefore very likely to be correct.
Those who think they know better than the scientists are picking #1. For example, you might hear someone say something to the effect of "Don't you know that some of the thermometers are in urban areas? It's hotter there."
Those who are paranoid are picking #2. For example, on talk radio I often hear, "The global warming crowd is out to destroy capitalism. It's all a hoax!"
Those who are well grounded in reality choose #3.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
industry insiders wrote:
Which makes every single counter-science claim by conservatives disreputable.
Mann, like so many other global warming researchers, seems to have something of an issue with the scientific principle of reproducibility--that others ought to be able to re-create the work. It speaks volumes about scientific credibility, none of it favorable to the IPCC crowd.
Science shares data and doesn't care where it leads, it seeks truth. Global warming is a cult.
So just how does this cult work?
How did the cult initiate all the climate scientists from all over the world, from all different countries, from all political persuasions, from all walks of life?
How does the hoax work?
How do they coordinate the lies?
Who is the cult leader?
Where is the evidence of the conspiracy?
Why hasn't the cult lost any followers?
Why isn't any former cult member speaking out about the conspiracy?
What is the cult's ultimate goal?
We've known about the greenhouse effect since the 1860's and we've known that it causes global warming since the 1890's. So the cult has existed for over 100 years without being exposed. That's just amazing.
Fat hurts wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Scientific findings must be repeatable: refusing to provide the underlying data is tantamount to confirmation that the findings are not repeatable. Michael Mann is a fraud who has perpetuated a falsehood. That is NOT science. It is a hoax.
The basics of global warming and climate change have been verified and reverified over and over and over for more than a century.
The scientific community overwhelmingly accepts anthropogenic global warming.
Given that fact, there are three possibilities:
1) The scientific community is made up of stupid people.
2) The scientific community is engaged in a global conspiracy.
3) The scientific community is made up of smart people who know how to do their jobs and are therefore very likely to be correct.
Those who think they know better than the scientists are picking #1. For example, you might hear someone say something to the effect of "Don't you know that some of the thermometers are in urban areas? It's hotter there."
Those who are paranoid are picking #2. For example, on talk radio I often hear, "The global warming crowd is out to destroy capitalism. It's all a hoax!"
Those who are well grounded in reality choose #3.
1) Global warming has a political agenda
2) Concealing data is as anti-science as you can get. Michael Mann is a fraud.
3) What do you call a scientist that won't publish his data and methodologies? NOT A SCIENTIST!
The political Global Warming movement is about using the veneer of science to pursue a political end. The vice chair of the IPCC let the cat out of the bag before when he stated that the AGW movement was not about the climate, it was about wealth redistribution.
Your three tired arguments fall flat. Massive fail.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
The basics of global warming and climate change have been verified and reverified over and over and over for more than a century.
The scientific community overwhelmingly accepts anthropogenic global warming.
Given that fact, there are three possibilities:
1) The scientific community is made up of stupid people.
2) The scientific community is engaged in a global conspiracy.
3) The scientific community is made up of smart people who know how to do their jobs and are therefore very likely to be correct.
Those who think they know better than the scientists are picking #1. For example, you might hear someone say something to the effect of "Don't you know that some of the thermometers are in urban areas? It's hotter there."
Those who are paranoid are picking #2. For example, on talk radio I often hear, "The global warming crowd is out to destroy capitalism. It's all a hoax!"
Those who are well grounded in reality choose #3.
1) Global warming has a political agenda
2) Concealing data is as anti-science as you can get. Michael Mann is a fraud.
3) What do you call a scientist that won't publish his data and methodologies? NOT A SCIENTIST!
The political Global Warming movement is about using the veneer of science to pursue a political end. The vice chair of the IPCC let the cat out of the bag before when he stated that the AGW movement was not about the climate, it was about wealth redistribution.
Your three tired arguments fall flat. Massive fail.
Yet you can't refute my arguments. All you can do is try to deflect. And you still refuse to tell me more about this cult/hoax.
Science is right. You are wrong.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Calyope wrote:
You make a mistake assuming that Rigged pays attention to anything other than what Trump tells him. Rigged knows nothing of the economy or trends or anything other than what Trump's balls taste like. He's an idiot racist wanker.
Name calling is not an argument. Troll harder.
Not making an argument. Just stating the facts. You are an idiot racist wanker. You prove time and time again that you don't understand anything at all, and you continue to get down on your knees for Trump. You are an idiot racist wanker, and everyone here knows it. I have no idea why you keep posting. Idiot racist wanker.
Rigged is a Klownboy wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Name calling is not an argument. Troll harder.
ROFLOL . . . so cries the #1 name caller on this thread.
Your trolling score is -10/10.
Yep. Rigged is a big cry baby who dishes it out but can't take it.
Trollminator wrote:
Sally Vixxxxxxxxxins wrote:
Trump is not a hypocrite like all the rich Hollywood people and the rich politicians. He doesn't talk about Global Warming and how it will ruin the Earth and then go fly in a private jet. He knows Global Warming is the biggest scientific hoax ever so he has no problem riding in a private jet. He knows that the Earth has gone through warming and cooling periods in its history. He understands that we will be entering a cooling phase in the not-too-distant-future. He is not a phony like the liberals who talk about tipping points and what we must do (spend trillions of tax dollars) to save the EArth.
So you’d rather believe and trust in a guy who thinks exercise shortens one’s life?
And that if we use wind power that the televisions go dark if the wind isn't blowing, and you need ID to buy cereal, and young people pay $12 a year for health insurance, and we believe asbestos is bad because of the mob, and environmentally friendly light bulbs cause cancer, and the noise from windmills causes cancer, and sleep is bad for you, and vaccines cause autism, and shaking hands is evil, and dogs are horrible, and he's more popular than Abraham Lincoln, who, he says most people don't know was a Republican, and the F-14 stealth fighter is literally invisible, and on and on.
This guy is a buffoon as are all the wankers who support him.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Scientific findings must be repeatable: refusing to provide the underlying data is tantamount to confirmation that the findings are not repeatable. Michael Mann is a fraud who has perpetuated a falsehood. That is NOT science. It is a hoax.
Michael Mann!
Fat hurts wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
1) Global warming has a political agenda
2) Concealing data is as anti-science as you can get. Michael Mann is a fraud.
3) What do you call a scientist that won't publish his data and methodologies? NOT A SCIENTIST!
The political Global Warming movement is about using the veneer of science to pursue a political end. The vice chair of the IPCC let the cat out of the bag before when he stated that the AGW movement was not about the climate, it was about wealth redistribution.
Your three tired arguments fall flat. Massive fail.
Yet you can't refute my arguments. All you can do is try to deflect. And you still refuse to tell me more about this cult/hoax.
Science is right. You are wrong.
Again, the scientific method is to have free and open examination of the hypotheses and the data. The fact that Mann refuses to do so is evidence of fraud. If he believed his own hypothesis he would be happy to have it independently verified.
The hockey stick was a deliberate fraud, something that could be proved if one had access to the data and calculations.
Mann refused to produce these documents. He was ordered to produce them by the court and given a deadline. He refused to comply.
He is a fraud, his report is a fraud and global warming is a fraud.
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
I’m a D2 female runner. Our coach explicitly told us not to visit LetsRun forums.
Guys between age of 45 and 55 do you think about death or does it seem far away
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday
