Runningart2004 wrote:
I understand attacking Congressmen and women, at least in a passive way, but I can't remember a president that has ever attacked cities or states (California, Baltimore, etc) simply because that city or state tends to vote a certain way or is led by certain politicians.
Is this now ok? Is the President no longer the executive of the entire USA? Does he not represent the entire country? And this is ok? No one wearing the same colors is disagreeing with him. What is this? Bloods vs Crips?
Alan
Trump has been that way since day one. He labels Democrats, whom are supported by about half of all Americans, as being for open borders, crime, and as wanting to take away our guns. All though the agreements were supported by a majority of Americans, he withdrew the U.S. from the Paris Climate Agreement and the Iran Deal. He also shut down the government to get a wall, even though about 35% of Americans think one is unnecessary. And in spite of up to 90% of Americans being in favor of allowing the "Dreamers" to stay, Trump, if he can obtain control of their fate, will try to use them as a trading chip for his effing wall.
Trump's strategy, and it's also his full-time job, is to promote himself by playing to his base and giving the middle finger to everyone else.