Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Fox News really did not like Mueller not exonerating Trump.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/steve-hilton-time-to-take-the-fight-to-the-ridiculous-never-trumpers

L L wrote:

Fox News really did not like Mueller not exonerating Trump.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/steve-hilton-time-to-take-the-fight-to-the-ridiculous-never-trumpers

That's in the opinion section which is just click-bait. All cable news networks have garbage opinion sections from people who don't even pretend to be intellectual about an issue, they just herp derp and flail on the floor over whatever outrage flavor of the week is being served.

Not that Fox News doesn't suck, but gotta give discredit where discredit is due.

What I don't understand about Mueller is that Starr went MUCH further in implicating Bill Clinton in obstruction yet Mueller ties himself up in legal knots.

He overestimates the general intelligence of most people.

He's still likely to come to Congress and the Dems will ask him "Given the evidence for obstruction in your report, could you have indicted that person if he wasn't president". That's precisely what the report says without coming out with it. Congress is going to want straight answers because people are kinda dumb.

Alan

Runningart2004 wrote:

What I don't understand about Mueller is that Starr went MUCH further in implicating Bill Clinton in obstruction yet Mueller ties himself up in legal knots.

He overestimates the general intelligence of most people.

He's still likely to come to Congress and the Dems will ask him "Given the evidence for obstruction in your report, could you have indicted that person if he wasn't president". That's precisely what the report says without coming out with it. Congress is going to want straight answers because people are kinda dumb.

Alan

I read about an interesting anti-trump project - it was making little 45 second animated movies bringing to life the obstructiony and vile things trump is described doing. People won't read, so maybe little social media friendly clips will do the job spreading the word.

Most Rs no doubt think the Mueller report exonerated trump. Have to get across the falseness of that narrative.

You know what people hate more than reading?

Admitting they were wrong.

Mueller isn't trying to estimate the intelligence of most people.

All that matters is the intelligence of Nancy Pelosi.

The report and his public statement was aimed at her.

She can read. She can understand what he was saying, that he laid out the evidence for Congress.

She is not confused by what he meant.

The question isn't whether Mueller would indict if he could.

The question is whether Congress will indict given the evidence that was laid at their feet.

Now, there is also evidence that SDNY has unrelated to the Mueller report that can be tacked on.

The very thing that Cohen is in jail for which he did for Trump is not part of the Mueller report.

Racket wrote:

agip wrote:

I read about an interesting anti-trump project - it was making little 45 second animated movies bringing to life the obstructiony and vile things trump is described doing. People won't read, so maybe little social media friendly clips will do the job spreading the word.

Most Rs no doubt think the Mueller report exonerated trump. Have to get across the falseness of that narrative.

You know what people hate more than reading?

Admitting they were wrong.

It's the indies and the purples who need to be reached. To either stay at home and not vote or to actually vote for a democrat. Most people don't have any freaking clue what is going on in DC...touching them is hard, and things like this can get to them.

But sure, a hardcore trumpist is not going to changer her mind.

Steve Hilton couldn’t match donny for hair, so he went with pink lipstick ?? Looks like a forward-thinking piece for the Fashion section.

Where is "EPIC Flagpole's" monthly smackdown?

Accuracy and logic are always dubious but these posts are always entertaining.

Where is EPIC Flagpole? wrote:

Where is "EPIC Flagpole's" monthly smackdown?

Accuracy and logic are always dubious but these posts are always entertaining.

So, you are entertained by dubious accuracy and logic? Ok. Seems weird, but to each his own.

Flagpole wrote:

Where is EPIC Flagpole? wrote:

Where is "EPIC Flagpole's" monthly smackdown?

Accuracy and logic are always dubious but these posts are always entertaining.

So, you are entertained by dubious accuracy and logic? Ok. Seems weird, but to each his own.

comedy writing and it's something to look forward to every month

Where is EPIC Flagpole wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

So, you are entertained by dubious accuracy and logic? Ok. Seems weird, but to each his own.

comedy writing and it's something to look forward to every month

Meh. Lame comedy writing.

Racket wrote:

agip wrote:

I read about an interesting anti-trump project - it was making little 45 second animated movies bringing to life the obstructiony and vile things trump is described doing. People won't read, so maybe little social media friendly clips will do the job spreading the word.

Most Rs no doubt think the Mueller report exonerated trump. Have to get across the falseness of that narrative.

You know what people hate more than reading?

Admitting they were wrong.

Why does everything have to be about Igy?

Trump supports first responders, until he has to pay them.

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/tale-2-invoices-beto-orourke-pays-el-paso-080100582--abc-news-topstories.html

P wrote:

not true wrote:

4) You have absolutely no clue about what I am taking about.

So, you admit to posting inappropriately while simultaneously avoiding responsibility.

I expected better from you. Obviously, without justification - just trying to give you the benefit of the doubt.

You are clueless. Maybe you can find someone who will pay you $10,000/hour to eat a heaping spoonful of your own poop each hour. You could make $400,000 in a week! That is almost as much as the presidential salary for an entire year. Best of luck finding your "fantasy" job.

what's true... wrote:

not true wrote:

[quote]Simple question... wrote:

[quote]Fat hurts wrote:

[quote]not true wrote:

[quote]Fat hurts wrote:

[quote]not true wrote:

[quote]Fat hurts wrote:

[quote]E-conomy wrote:

Is that I have no idea why you quoted my post or what you are taking exception with about my post...

i never said that picking was the only thing that happened at work with strawberry fields nor did i imply it... that has nothing to do with my point... it seems like you should be agreeing with the point of my post not taking exception... "you boys"?? what??

Your posting name DOES NOT appear in the response chain.

Trump is livid that he cannot watch Fox and Friends while in the UK. He wants everyone to stop watching CNN to make his pain go away.

L L wrote:

Fox News really did not like Mueller not exonerating Trump.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/steve-hilton-time-to-take-the-fight-to-the-ridiculous-never-trumpers

Demonrats lose again wrote:

Racket wrote:

You know what people hate more than reading?

Admitting they were wrong.

Why does everything have to be about Igy?

Igy's name does not appear in the posts you are replying to, and complaining, about.

Trump supports contractors, until he has to pay them. Trump supports illegal immigrants, until he has to pay them. Trump supports paying taxes, until he has to pay them.

Ciro wrote:

Trump supports first responders, until he has to pay them.

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/tale-2-invoices-beto-orourke-pays-el-paso-080100582--abc-news-topstories.html