Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

agip wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

I heard for two years from the liberal media that Trump was attempting to fire Mueller and maybe also Rosenstein. For two years I heard that crock. Why did he not fire them? He can fire them in a heartbeat. He is head of the executive branch. Nothing stopped him from firing them. And he never fired them. So don't give the that BS that Trump was trying to fire them. If he wanted to fire them he would have fired them. Do you understand how the president is in charge of the executive president?

HE DID ATTEMPT TO FIRE MUELLER. HE DID. WHAT ARE YOU EVEN TALKING ABOUT?

Do you have no clue how the executive branch operates? Seriously?

Sally Vix wrote:

Even Geraldo Rivera, a well-known liberal...

?

Sally Vix wrote:

. . . Even Geraldo Rivera, a well-known liberal, said . . .

Have you ever wondered if you could straight out say all you've ever done here is troll for a reaction and still get serious responses contradicting you?

Monkeys typing wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

. . . Even Geraldo Rivera, a well-known liberal, said . . .

Have you ever wondered if you could straight out say all you've ever done here is troll for a reaction and still get serious responses contradicting you?

Not a troll at all. I come here for serious discussion but many here rely on what they here from sources that are not truthful.

Sally Vix wrote:

Monkeys typing wrote:

Have you ever wondered if you could straight out say all you've ever done here is troll for a reaction and still get serious responses contradicting you?

Not a troll at all. I come here for serious discussion but many here rely on what they here from sources that are not truthful.

Everyone knows you're a troll but since you're not very smart it's amusing to watch you stumble over your own stupid bullsh!t, kinda like watching fat people fall down.

Sally Vix wrote:

Monkeys typing wrote:

Have you ever wondered if you could straight out say all you've ever done here is troll for a reaction and still get serious responses contradicting you?

Not a troll at all. I come here for serious discussion but many here rely on what they here from sources that are not truthful.

K

Racket wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Not a troll at all. I come here for serious discussion but many here rely on what they here from sources that are not truthful.

Everyone knows you're a troll but since you're not very smart it's amusing to watch you stumble over your own stupid bullsh!t, kinda like watching fat people fall down.

What kind of a loser enjoys watching fat people fall down? Seriously? Is that how you get your grins? Are you 5' 5" and 124 pounds? Is that how you roll. Getting enjoyment from watching heavy people have problems? Are you that sad of a person? This is the last time I will ever respond to your sorry arse. What a pathetic person you are deriving joy from overweight people fall down. Sicko!

Bonespurs Trump wrote:

General Howe wrote:

How do you know that?

Because that is pure Trump.

So, you just made it up and lied.

That is pure Trump.

Sally Vix wrote:

Racket wrote:

Everyone knows you're a troll but since you're not very smart it's amusing to watch you stumble over your own stupid bullsh!t, kinda like watching fat people fall down.

What kind of a loser enjoys watching fat people fall down? Seriously? Is that how you get your grins? Are you 5' 5" and 124 pounds? Is that how you roll. Getting enjoyment from watching heavy people have problems? Are you that sad of a person? This is the last time I will ever respond to your sorry arse. What a pathetic person you are deriving joy from overweight people fall down. Sicko!

Your trolling used to be better.

So much for Trump's claim that China was paying his tariffs to the US Treasury.

Trump Seeks $15 BILLION from Congress to Protect Farmers From His Own Trade War

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/19/us/politics/farming-trump-trade-war.html

It’s getting harder to defend trump. Sux 2 B Sal.

If you are a Trump supporter you have lost all the high ground, sorry. You have listened to him and read his tweets correct? #bebest

Sally Vix wrote:

There is a corollary to Bonaparte's: "If you start to take Vienna, take Vienna." It is: "If you start to remove Trump, remove Trump." Well, the conspirators miscalculated and Trump is still in power. Over the next year you will see a number of co-conspirators crumble.

Removing ANY president via the impeachment process is NOT trying to "reverse an election". Reversing an election is right-wing garbage speak to try to spin the impeachment of Trump.

Trump is facing likely impeachment and then even more likely legal punishment (prison) for his actions both during the election and after.

If he is removed from office for any reason, Pence will become President (unless Pence is also being removed for some reason).

It never matters that a criminal President was elected by the people (see Nixon). Those who get themselves into impeachment talk did so by their own actions. We are allowed, under the Constitution, to remove a criminal President.

Wrong again, little man.

And of course Congress is elected just like trump (only twice as often). Darn that democracy, darn that Constitution!

Sally Vix wrote:

L L wrote:

That's the Trump brainwashing affect.

He paints a person one way to his base and defends his firing.

In reality he just gets rid of everyone that will not conspire with him.

He really tried to have Mueller fired and Rosenstein.

I heard for two years from the liberal media that Trump was attempting to fire Mueller and maybe also Rosenstein. For two years I heard that crock. Why did he not fire them? He can fire them in a heartbeat. He is head of the executive branch. Nothing stopped him from firing them. And he never fired them. So don't give the that BS that Trump was trying to fire them. If he wanted to fire them he would have fired them. Do you understand how the president is in charge of the executive president?

Good Lord. There are many reasons Trump didn't just fire Mueller himself, but the two main ones are:

1) He's a wimp. This has been brought up several times by administration insiders...he fired people on is reality show, but he does not have the stomach for it when it really matters in person.

2) He gets cover if someone else does the firing...at a MINIMUM, he gets one other person to agree with him that the firing was deserved...all done to protect himself.

The Mueller Report clearly lays out that Trump contacted McGahn numerous times for him to get rid of Mueller, and McGahn refused. That is irrefutable. That is one of the reasons there are now over 800 former prosecutors who say that if Trump were not president right now that he would have been indicted. Fox News' Judge Napolitano is one who agrees.

The Mueller Report (the 90-92% that we have been allowed to read) is damning on the subject of Obstruction of Justice. Foolish to believe otherwise.

jesseriley wrote:

And of course Congress is elected just like trump (only twice as often). Darn that democracy, darn that Constitution!

I will say this again...you are the best poster in this thread.

Sally Vix wrote:

Monkeys typing wrote:

Have you ever wondered if you could straight out say all you've ever done here is troll for a reaction and still get serious responses contradicting you?

Not a troll at all. I come here for serious discussion but many here rely on what they here from sources that are not truthful.

I agree with Sally that Sally is not a troll.

Sally is ignorant of the subjects discussed in this thread, and on the wrong side of what is right in general regarding those subjects.

I hope our Democracy survives Trump. I THINK it will, but I am not as certain about that as I once was...he is truly a bad bad person, and the level of support he still maintains is insane.