Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Not really using your brain but you could be...trumpers!

agip wrote:

It doesn't matter that 'collusion' was not found.

Collusion was never going to be found. Trump has always been safe running around saying, tweeting and farting "no collusion" because per the Mueller Report itself "collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law."

The Fokus wrote:

agip wrote:

It doesn't matter that 'collusion' was not found.

Collusion was never going to be found. Trump has always been safe running around saying, tweeting and farting "no collusion" because per the Mueller Report itself "collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law."

Conspiracy is the crime.

CONspirancy wrote:

The Fokus wrote:

Collusion was never going to be found. Trump has always been safe running around saying, tweeting and farting "no collusion" because per the Mueller Report itself "collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law."

Conspiracy is the crime.

That should be: Conspiracy is a Federal crime.

CONspirancy wrote:

The Fokus wrote:

Collusion was never going to be found. Trump has always been safe running around saying, tweeting and farting "no collusion" because per the Mueller Report itself "collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law."

Conspiracy is the crime.

Right. But Trump could safely for two years scream "no collusion" and he'd be right because collusion was never going to be mentioned in the report other than to eliminate it as a term. I'm sure WH lawyers filled Trump in on this fact long ago.

Whether you are trying to find collusion or conspiracy, the only way to find evidence would be if they recorded their conversations or were dumb enough to conspire by email and save the emails.

Or you get testimony from individuals who admit they conspired. They tried to squeeze Manafort to give testimony in exchange for going easy on the tax fraud but he wouldn't budge.

So, Trump's campaign could easily have conspired with Russian officials to do all that they did and Mueller would find no evidence of it.

That's what the report said. They found no evidence of cooperation, not that they found there was no "collusion".

And .... if Mueller couldn't gather evidence because of Trump's obstruction, that's a serious impeachable crime.

For example, Comey was investigating Flynn's actions and Trump fired Comey to prevent further investigation.

Serious obstruction of justice right there.

Monkeys typing wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

I agree that Sally is not a troll. He's just uber ignorant on this subject and unwilling to put in the work to learn what really happened. . . .

How can you be certain that your assessment is the correct one and that Sally has not been playing you?

You can never be certain of a thing like that. Sally does not behave as a typical troll would...though admittedly that would be a perhaps smart way to troll. A troll typically wouldn't ban discussions with other users. People are odd (not saying Sally is odd), so you never really know for sure how someone might behave, but I don't believe him to be a troll.

Flagpole wrote:

Monkeys typing wrote:

How can you be certain that your assessment is the correct one and that Sally has not been playing you?

You can never be certain of a thing like that. Sally does not behave as a typical troll would...though admittedly that would be a perhaps smart way to troll. A troll typically wouldn't ban discussions with other users. People are odd (not saying Sally is odd), so you never really know for sure how someone might behave, but I don't believe him to be a troll.

Thanks, Flagpole. I was kidding about banning you. Although, I always have that option. LOL. I would even not mind if you were to call me odd. Being "odd" means you don't fit the norm. Someone "odd" might also be considered "exceptional." I don't even mind you calling me "uber ignorant." Being "uber" anything in my book could be construed as somewhat as a compliment. Not sure what you on the left are making out the Congressional Dems shying away from impeachments proceedings at this point. Nice to see that Democratic presidential contenders are full-storm-ahead in trashing Mayor Pete who had been doing swimmingly thus far. I am still pondering if Bernie could beat Donald in the next election. I had worried about Biden (I actually would have considered voting for him) but he has too many negatives. Hope everyone is having a wonderful day!

Sally Vix wrote:

Hope everyone is having a wonderful day!

You too.

Flagpole wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Hope everyone is having a wonderful day!

You too.

Sally has already offered you a room at her/his place.

rooming wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

You too.

Sally has already offered you a room at her/his place.

Flagpole already ran a very nice 5K time. He does not need to race a 58-year-old. He is a pretty good father and husband.

I think there are always reservations about presidential candidates. There was with Reagan, Clinton, W.Bush, Obama, Trump....I think HW Bush was the most qualified person we’ve had as president in my lifetime. The negatives with Biden are no worse than Clinton’s or Trump’s...but at least his touchy feely past isn’t due to explicit sexual harassment or assault or rape.

Alan

If for some reason Trump is not on the Republican ticket for 2020, who would you like to see be the Republican nominee?

L L wrote:

If for some reason Trump is not on the Republican ticket for 2020, who would you like to see be the Republican nominee?

Scott Baio

I would like to hear from someone that typically votes Republican or voted for or defends Trump.

Democrats are Buttjudge lovers!!!!

That’s hilarious!!!!

Fat hurts wrote:

L L wrote:

If for some reason Trump is not on the Republican ticket for 2020, who would you like to see be the Republican nominee?

Scott Baio

Alec Baldwin. Another hot head who is a conservatives who doesn't believe in Trumpism.

As a "candidate" many voters will see Biden as too old.