If, if, if, if, but, but,but...........oh shut up already, delusional one. You have a NOTHINGBURGER. Enjoy!
If, if, if, if, but, but,but...........oh shut up already, delusional one. You have a NOTHINGBURGER. Enjoy!
WTF^n wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Looks like Flagpole is all set to be the recipient of another humiliating loss. His so-called "guarantee" that Trump would not finish his first term has gone kaput. Flagpole has for 2-plus years been proclaiming that "Mueller is coming" and "Trump is done" but, alas, that is not to be. Nancy Pelosi knows what is coming in the Mueller report and she knows it is a nothingburger. Thus, she has already been indicating that she will not pursue impeachment charges. Flagpole, Mueller IS NOT COMING. You embarrassed yourself previously and are humiliating yourself once again. As a friend, I would suggest you must sleek away in the middle of the night. No more guarantees - which are failed guarantees. No more, Flagpole. As a friend, just leave.
"Sleek away in the middle of the night"?!? WTF?
English much?
As many have said....here come the Flagpole excuses. Well, they "could" have impeached him. Well, he was impeachable.
No, if they could and had enough, they would. Go back to your hole Flagpole.
Clownpole goes down then gets down with poles.
~clown with a pole in his hole
Snatchpole wrote:
WTF^n wrote:
"Sleek away in the middle of the night"?!? WTF?
English much?
As many have said....here come the Flagpole excuses. Well, they "could" have impeached him. Well, he was impeachable.
No, if they could and had enough, they would. Go back to your hole Flagpole.
I see. So you being incapable of using the English language properly makes me Flagpole?
Logic much?
muellerthegreat wrote:
i ain't comming.
https://www.axios.com/nancy-pelosi-impeaching-trump-not-worth-it-ecaf3447-5a00-45f2-9e54-3aab287f32d1.html
I think Flagpole will claim to see aliens tonight.
You and Rigged and the rest of you whacko right wingers are hilarious (probably all the same guy or 2. Soooooo many news names on every post).
Yes, I told FW to shut up with his oh-so-annoying "100% guarantee! 100% guarantee!!" that Hillary would win the election. It wasn't funny, it was stupidly repetitive, it was boring and annoying, and of course never was true (there was no 100% about it).
And yes, he's been pulling the same act since then with the Mueller report. Sigh.
But....all you guys attacking FW are....pulling a FW. You are counting your chickens before they hatch with your "100% certainty" that the Mueller report will turn up nothing disastrous or really egregious for Trump. Why? Oh, right, because you love Trump and want it to be so. There are lots of suggestions that some fairly big bombs could be dropped in the report. But who knows for sure (oh, right FW and his critics on the other side both know for sure). Mueller has kept his cards very close to his vest, with almost no statements and few hints. So we'll have to wait to find out.
And as far as Pelosi's statement being some huge sign that nothing will be in the report, what nonsense. Despite right wingers' constant belief in conspiracies, no one is leaking to her. Mueller doesn't play that. She doesn't know what's gonna be in the report either. But....
She DOES know that unless it's bombshells of epic proportions and without any shred of a doubt, Trump and people will explain it all away as a conspiracy against him, as not true, and not sign on to impeach him. And she knows what happened to Repubs when they impeached Clinton: his popularity went WAY UP. As the NYTIMES put it:
"A failed attempt to impeach Mr. Trump and remove him from office, they fear, would only embolden the president’s staunchest supporters and could improve his odds of re-election."
So, believe it or not, she's not stupid. She's taking impeachment mostly off the table, for now. But that could change.
But the main point: the Mueller report could still have hugely negative information on Trump, and really be disastrous for him. We don't know, and we don't know if the Mueller conclusions, or conclusions formed in other investigations, could still lead to impeachment at some point, despite Pelosi's statement. We will see.
Meh. Clinton's approval ratings spiked and then took a dive. Very short-lived rise.
You sound little a bitter person. Flagpole was right about the election and he will soon be PROVEN right.
Trump: The Democrats have become an anti-Israel and an anti-Jewish party.
Alt-Right fanboys in chinos and polo shirts: Jews will not replace us
Must be very confusing for those same fan boys.
The Fokus wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Charges will include:
Obstruction of Justice
Money Laundering
Conspiracy (could be bribery instead, but it will be as a result of the non-legal term, in this case, collusion)
Bank and/or wire fraud
Emoluments clause
Campaign finance
RICO
Something with regard to chattels
Privacy and/or hacking and/or computer fraud of some sort
Some other thing we don't know about
You are going to have one tough time come release of the report. There's likely to be no charges and rather a listing of evidence for Congress to deal with. The evidence will be spun both ways in the usual fashion and we'll move to the 2020 election with both sides pointing at each other.
I have not said these will all be covered in the Mueller Report. In fact, I have said exactly NOT that.
The financial stuff is most likely going to be handled by the SDNY, AND the New York Attorney General and probably some other office(s) too (as I have said before). Mueller will lay out evidence of obstruction of justice, witness tampering, perjury and suborning perjury. I do not have a clear vision on where the conspiracy stuff will come from. It MIGHT be in the Mueller Report, and it SHOULD be there...either evidence of it or exoneration of it, but it is unclear what exactly he may have farmed out. I am also unclear just now who will handle the Emoluments Clause violations.
Mueller will indict Don Jr. and Kushner for conspiracy. Manafort will face extra prison time for conspiracy. If this comes down while Trump is in office, he may be indicted under seal.
Trump will eventually be indicted either while in office or after he is out of office (likely the latter). He will spend time in prison for his crimes.
I still maintain he will be impeached by the House before the end of his first term and then the Senate will either convict him, or he will resign (unless death, crime, or aliens from space). If I am wrong about anything, it will just be the timing of it all and he will make it to the end of his first term. I have no opinion yet on whether he can actually win again in 2020 if he is eligible.
I have said for well over a year that if he escapes any of the things I laid out it will be due to plea bargain and/or pardon. It will be shown though that he did commit all the things I have laid out and then some, and even with plea bargain and pardon, he will not be able to escape some sort of a prison sentence.
He is in deep sh!t, and he will not walk away unscathed. He will suffer political, legal, and financial losses, the biggest of which may be the RICO charges that will destroy The Trump Organization.
My one concern with regard to all of this (I am not one to typically be concerned about anything) is that Trump will not live long enough to face the music. He's an obese 72 year old. Heart attack or stoke could end it all in an instant. I honestly wish him the best of health. America and the world needs to see video of him losing his office, losing his money, losing his freedom.
Mueller is coming (this of course INCLUDES anything that any office he pawned stuff off on finds, as I have stated many times before).
The clown is done.
Sally Vix wrote:
Looks like Flagpole is all set to be the recipient of another humiliating loss. His so-called "guarantee" that Trump would not finish his first term has gone kaput. Flagpole has for 2-plus years been proclaiming that "Mueller is coming" and "Trump is done" but, alas, that is not to be. Nancy Pelosi knows what is coming in the Mueller report and she knows it is a nothingburger. Thus, she has already been indicating that she will not pursue impeachment charges. Flagpole, Mueller IS NOT COMING. You embarrassed yourself previously and are humiliating yourself once again. As a friend, I would suggest you must sleek away in the middle of the night. No more guarantees - which are failed guarantees. No more, Flagpole. As a friend, just leave.
You declare victory too early, and your bicycle is beginning to wobble.
Pelosi's answer regarding Trump that "he's not worth it" is weird and perhaps her failed attempt at belittling him, but she doesn't share that opinion with the majority of House Democrats.
Here's what the Chairman of the House Budget Committee said about impeaching Trump - "To me it's not a question of 'whether,' it's a question of 'when,' and probably right now is not the right time, but I think at some point it's going to be inevitable," Rep. John Yarmuth.
I agree with him. We need to see the Mueller Report at a minimum first (unless some other crazy thing happens before then) before impeachment proceedings begin.
I don't know how conniving Pelosi is, but her comments today allow her to later on say, "I have been against impeaching the President all the way up until now. Now, when we see what the Special Counsel has discovered, we have a duty to hold this President accountable." A reporter then will say, "Back on March 11, you said, "he's not worth it". How do you respond?" Shen will then say something like, "The American people are worth it." What benefit does Pelosi or the Democrats get by her being so against impeachment now? Independents and moderate conservatives will look at that and come to the conclusion that the Democrats weren't just out for blood the entire time...helps them get behind an impeachment process.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
agip wrote:
muellerthegreat wrote:
i ain't comming.
https://www.axios.com/nancy-pelosi-impeaching-trump-not-worth-it-ecaf3447-5a00-45f2-9e54-3aab287f32d1.htmlThis is an example of how politicians can look ahead a couple of plays.
Now Pelosi can say 'hey. I wasn't for impeachment - I said I was against it. But what we have learned is so egregious that we MUST impeach.'
If she had been all for impeachment now, Is would just say 'ah see they were just going to impeach no matter what - it's just more politics.'
CORRECT! I just said the same basic thing before reading your comments. You are correct. I am correct.
Sally Vix wrote:
Dude, if what Mueller reports is really bad, it matters not one iota what she has said previously. As it is it is apparent that he has nothing, i repeat NOTHING, on Trump. So the last 2 years that you Libs have been whining and bellyaching about Trump is all for naught. Cut your losses and go home.
1) Your first sentence is correct technically. Optics are always a thing in politics though, and her stated reluctance to impeach him for so long works in her favor ultimately.
2) The rest is something you need to prove. How do you know Mueller has "nothing" on Trump? Maybe you have knowledge that I do not have. Please elaborate and educate me.
Snatchpole wrote:
WTF^n wrote:
"Sleek away in the middle of the night"?!? WTF?
English much?
As many have said....here come the Flagpole excuses. Well, they "could" have impeached him. Well, he was impeachable.
No, if they could and had enough, they would. Go back to your hole Flagpole.
This whole "excuses" thing is weird. I NEVER do that, and you can't find evidence that I have.
I will not say anything of the sort like you just asserted. The House will either impeach Trump or it won't. I say it will with the caveats that I have long supplied -- unless he dies first, unless there is criminal activity (DISCOVERED) that prevents it, or unless aliens from space prevent it.
Don't project your fragile self onto me. I make predictions and admit either that I was wrong or state that I was right. I have 100% integrity 100% of the time.
i'm done but flagpole ain't done.
admirable is he, who fights on without arms and legs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmInkxbvlCs
or not,
FW - You better hope aliens are coming or you don't have a chance now.
1) You are correct that Trumpers here are counting their chickens before they've hatched. Not a good idea.
2) Apparently I didn't say it enough in that other NOW DELETED thread, because I never said "100% guarantee." I don't typically use the word "guarantee" because that normally means putting something up against it, and I don't do such things (I don't bet because that is low class). What I DID say in that now deleted thread (if I wanted to lie, I could because it doesn't exist anymore) was that Trump had "ZERO chance" to win. Now, what I also said at least twice in that other thread was that it was conditional...that there not be any cheating and that aliens from space didn't make it so. I even used the example of Olympic Gold medalists being stripped of their victories if found to have cheated. So, once conspiracy with Russia from anyone in his campaign staff or anyone working with him is proven, I will be RIGHT about the 2016 election...actually, I am right now, but I will be PROVEN right when conspiracy is shown.
3) To be clear about my position, I do not KNOW what's in Mueller's report, and I do not pretend to know. I am simply making a prediction on what is to happen to Trump based on what we all do know at this point due to court filings and his behavior. My prediction will either be right or wrong.
4) I agree that Pelosi doesn't know what will be in the report.
5) You are correct that we don't know anything about impeachment due to Pelosi's statement.
So, here's the prediction...and I'm sorry Tyrone ReXXXing, but I do have to post this regularly because I get accused of "making excuses" or "backpedaling" or some other nonsense. I need to have a historical record that I did not waver.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Not all true wrote:
Flagpole was right about the election and he will soon be PROVEN right.
You are...CORRECT!
Oh, and before anyone says you are me:
WEJO, DO AN IP CHECK, AND IF I LIE, BAN ME FOR LIFE!!!!!!!!!!!
Ciro wrote:
Trump: The Democrats have become an anti-Israel and an anti-Jewish party.
Alt-Right fanboys in chinos and polo shirts: Jews will not replace us
Must be very confusing for those same fan boys.
That is not true, but Democrats aren't immune from being racist and/or bigoted, and we need to stamp that out whenever we see it.
SETI wrote:
FW - You better hope aliens are coming or you don't have a chance now.
Or what...a prediction I have made will turn out not to come true? Oh no! How will I ever go on?!
Methinks you are pretty certain of yourself for no reason.
the clown is done
mueller is coming.
ok flagpole, off you go to the asylum.
life without parole.
I’m a D2 female runner. Our coach explicitly told us not to visit LetsRun forums.
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
Hats off to my dad. He just ran a 1:42 Half Marathon and turns 75 in 2 months!