Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Creepy porn lawyer loses, again!

Mueller never

Clownpole forever

And the overrated Buckeyes lost too. Haha!

Mueller never

Clownpole forever

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

And the overrated Buckeyes lost too. Haha!

I agree that they are and were overrated all year. I wouldn't actually call myself a fan of Ohio State football anymore as I haven't watched a game now in several years...my Saturdays have been taken up by going to cross country meets, and I have dropped even any small bit of fandom for any professional team these days. Still a fan of individual professional players who are worthy of that, but I don't watch college sports, unless it is cross country or track and field at all anymore.

So, I couldn't care less that the Buckeyes lost this weekend...a game that I didn't even watch and didn't know the score of until after noon on Sunday.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Fatty Huffs wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Timothy McVeigh was an ultra-conservative. So were the 9/11 hijackers.

Case closed.

No they weren't.

Case open.

Timothy McVeigh was a registered Republican who bombed the Murrah Federal Building because he was angry over the Clinton administration's handling of the Branch Davidians in Waco. He was unarguably an ultra-conservative.

The 9/11 hijackers were Islamic fundamentalists. A religious fundamentalist is, by definition, ultra-conservative.

The case remains closed.

Fat hurts wrote:

Fatty Huffs wrote:

No they weren't.

Case open.

Timothy McVeigh was a registered Republican who bombed the Murrah Federal Building because he was angry over the Clinton administration's handling of the Branch Davidians in Waco. He was unarguably an ultra-conservative.

The 9/11 hijackers were Islamic fundamentalists. A religious fundamentalist is, by definition, ultra-conservative.

The case remains closed.

McVeigh was an anarchist more than anything I think.

I laughed out loud.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DpqPGHlW4AAKbv2.jpg

Not so fast bro wrote:

I laughed out loud.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DpqPGHlW4AAKbv2.jpg

LOL. Been laughing at Luckovich for almost 30 years. He is the best in the business.

Racket wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Timothy McVeigh was a registered Republican who bombed the Murrah Federal Building because he was angry over the Clinton administration's handling of the Branch Davidians in Waco. He was unarguably an ultra-conservative.

The 9/11 hijackers were Islamic fundamentalists. A religious fundamentalist is, by definition, ultra-conservative.

The case remains closed.

McVeigh was an anarchist more than anything I think.

Perhaps, but note that anarchists come in both conservative and liberal varieties.

Fat hurts wrote:

Not so fast bro wrote:

I laughed out loud.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DpqPGHlW4AAKbv2.jpg

LOL. Been laughing at Luckovich for almost 30 years. He is the best in the business.

That summarizes Trump pretty well - an ass within an ass yelling immaturely at others like a 3rd grader. Yep, that’s the leader of the conservative movement.

That's ironic, considering the entire democratic party is a bunch of asses.

538 keeps moving the needle toward the Dems - the House forecast is stronger than ever for team blue - up to 85.7% likelihood.

The senate is also moving toward the Dems but still a longshot at just 22% likelihood.

Generic ballot is pretty good for the dems : 8.6%. Should be enough to get the house.

Although the fear is that all that is happening is that the excitement is all in districts the Dems will win anyway, so the net effect won't be as large in the white nationalist party districts.

I know moran trumpers aren't able to understand probabilities, but for those with a decent education and common sense will understand those numbers. Others...hey go vote for a know-nothing candidate. Your style.

Trollminator wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

LOL. Been laughing at Luckovich for almost 30 years. He is the best in the business.

That summarizes Trump pretty well - an ass within an ass yelling immaturely at others like a 3rd grader. Yep, that’s the leader of the conservative movement.

there is no conservative movement

agip wrote:

538 keeps moving the needle toward the Dems - the House forecast is stronger than ever for team blue - up to 85.7% likelihood.

The senate is also moving toward the Dems but still a longshot at just 22% likelihood.

Generic ballot is pretty good for the dems : 8.6%. Should be enough to get the house.

Although the fear is that all that is happening is that the excitement is all in districts the Dems will win anyway, so the net effect won't be as large in the white nationalist party districts.

I know moran trumpers aren't able to understand probabilities, but for those with a decent education and common sense will understand those numbers. Others...hey go vote for a know-nothing candidate. Your style.

You certainly had no clue of the probabilities in 2016 when every lib here and almost every pollster had Hillary winning, easily.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

agip wrote:

538 keeps moving the needle toward the Dems - the House forecast is stronger than ever for team blue - up to 85.7% likelihood.

The senate is also moving toward the Dems but still a longshot at just 22% likelihood.

Generic ballot is pretty good for the dems : 8.6%. Should be enough to get the house.

Although the fear is that all that is happening is that the excitement is all in districts the Dems will win anyway, so the net effect won't be as large in the white nationalist party districts.

I know moran trumpers aren't able to understand probabilities, but for those with a decent education and common sense will understand those numbers. Others...hey go vote for a know-nothing candidate. Your style.

You certainly had no clue of the probabilities in 2016 when every lib here and almost every pollster had Hillary winning, easily.

And that goes double for Mr Zero Percent Chance himself, Clownpole.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

agip wrote:

538 keeps moving the needle toward the Dems - the House forecast is stronger than ever for team blue - up to 85.7% likelihood.

The senate is also moving toward the Dems but still a longshot at just 22% likelihood.

Generic ballot is pretty good for the dems : 8.6%. Should be enough to get the house.

Although the fear is that all that is happening is that the excitement is all in districts the Dems will win anyway, so the net effect won't be as large in the white nationalist party districts.

I know moran trumpers aren't able to understand probabilities, but for those with a decent education and common sense will understand those numbers. Others...hey go vote for a know-nothing candidate. Your style.

You certainly had no clue of the probabilities in 2016 when every lib here and almost every pollster had Hillary winning, easily.

gawd these people are just asking to have us laugh at them

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

agip wrote:

538 keeps moving the needle toward the Dems - the House forecast is stronger than ever for team blue - up to 85.7% likelihood.

The senate is also moving toward the Dems but still a longshot at just 22% likelihood.

Generic ballot is pretty good for the dems : 8.6%. Should be enough to get the house.

Although the fear is that all that is happening is that the excitement is all in districts the Dems will win anyway, so the net effect won't be as large in the white nationalist party districts.

I know moran trumpers aren't able to understand probabilities, but for those with a decent education and common sense will understand those numbers. Others...hey go vote for a know-nothing candidate. Your style.

You certainly had no clue of the probabilities in 2016 when every lib here and almost every pollster had Hillary winning, easily.

We had more than a clue. Go look at old posts and you will see how I was extremely worried that Tiny had over a 30% chance of winning. A 3 in 10 probability comes up A LOT.

2 in 10 comes up A LOT too, which has me even more worried. If Republicans retain the house and senate then this nation will fall into complete authoritarian, fascist rule.

Fat hurts wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

You certainly had no clue of the probabilities in 2016 when every lib here and almost every pollster had Hillary winning, easily.

We had more than a clue. Go look at old posts and you will see how I was extremely worried that Tiny had over a 30% chance of winning. A 3 in 10 probability comes up A LOT.

2 in 10 comes up A LOT too, which has me even more worried. If Republicans retain the house and senate then this nation will fall into complete authoritarian, fascist rule.

LOL! SO dramatic!

Trump's best chance before the election was given to him by FiveThirtyEight, which had it at 27% the day prior and 28% on election day afternoon. But nearly every other outlet was saying 90%+ for HRC on election day. Didn't NYT say "94%"?

There's no reason to be "even more" worried with a lower probability (2/10 vs 3/10). That's just a ridiculous statement to make.

But you then topped yourself and made an even more ridiculous statement that the nation will fall into complete authoritarian, fascist rule. LOL- you guys are so silly.

I meant what I said. I am more worried now about a 2 in 10 chance of getting no check on Tiny than I was about the 3 in 10 chance of having Tiny as president.

Go search for articles about Tiny and fascism. If you read articles from 2016, all the experts were saying he is a dangerous neo-nationalist, but not really a fascist. The articles from 2018 tend to say, "OK, he actually does qualify as a fascist."

Tiny has shown himself to be a greater threat to the world than I previously thought. We need a strong check on his power more than ever.