Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Fat hurts wrote:

So I see four possibilities:

1) Dr. Ford is a very, very good liar.

2) Judge Kavanaugh is a very, very good liar.

3) Dr. Ford was attacked, but it was mistaken identity.

4) Judge Kavanaugh got drunk and attacked Dr. Ford, but forgot about it.

The whole incident apparently lasted just a few minutes. Kavanaugh was drunk and probably thought nothing of it afterward. But the incident stuck with Dr. Ford for the rest of her life.

I think the most likely truth is #4.

How do you reconcile that he would not want an FBI investigation to go clear his "good name"? He ran away from that question like the plague. He's guilty of something whether it's Dr. Ford or Avenatti's client...something.

Name wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Says it all:

link

Says the dude who came on this thread trying to convince folks that he was not a Trumpette.

Good one, Igy.

Or, as agip says about your kind:

“What kind of an amoral ideologue still supports a politician who has had FIVE campaign officials plead guilty to federal charges?”

or, updated:

What kind of an amoral ideologue still supports the confirmation onto the SCOTUS of an attempted rapist?

That party wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Easy three people who were identified as being there said it did not happen. The Democrats held this information for nearly two months to drop a bomb and delay past the election. It will backfire against the Democrats. Despicable really.

Ahem, specific party was not identified by Ford. Just a rough timeframe for it. It could have been one of several parties.

Kavanaugh cries that he doesn't know which party Ford is taking about.

Yet, you claim there are three witnesses to the specific party. Who provided those names to anyone? It could only have been Kavanaugh. Meaning, he knows exactly which party it was and he is lying through his teeth.

Are you really that misinformed? Dr. Ford provided the names.

No wonder some of you sound ignorant.

Name wrote:

Name wrote:

Says the dude who came on this thread trying to convince folks that he was not a Trumpette.

Good one, Igy.

Or, as agip says about your kind:

“What kind of an amoral ideologue still supports a politician who has had FIVE campaign officials plead guilty to federal charges?”

or, updated:

What kind of an amoral ideologue still supports the confirmation onto the SCOTUS of an attempted rapist?

A republican:

Republicans (54%) are the only group among whom a majority believes Kavanaugh should be confirmed even if the accusations prove to be true

Back Peddler Flagpole wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

I have long ago stated my final answer.

no, you said he'd be impeached. liar, liar, liar...back peddler.

What about this doesn't say that - "He will resign because he will be told that the Senate has the votes to convict him after the House has impeached him, though it is possible he will hang on and actually let the Senate remove him from office."

Read this part slowly..."after the House has impeached him..."

Good lord.

this is it wrote:

This is why Republicans will probably feel safe about confirming a rapist:

Groping women is "no big deal", a Donald Trump supporting mother told her daughters on national television when asked about the sexual misconduct allegations levelled against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

Standing alongside her teenage girls, the unidentified woman replied: “Groping a woman? At 18?”

Turning to her daughters, she then asked: “I mean, how many guys do you know who think that’s no big deal?”

As her daughters appeared to agree with her, she continued: “It’s not a big deal.”

The woman insisted that even if there was some truth to the allegations it “doesn't’t take away from his character and his job to do what he needs to do as a Supreme Court nominee.”

That is a consistent part of the mental gymnastics that the Trumpettes on this thread and elsewhere use.

1) Hypothesize a different event than the one that Ford describes ("maybe he touched her on the arm or something")

2) React to the entirely self constructed alternative story and judge it to be "no big deal".

3) Never, ever even acknowledge what is actually being claimed by Ford.

Name wrote:

Name wrote:

Says the dude who came on this thread trying to convince folks that he was not a Trumpette.

Good one, Igy.

Or, as agip says about your kind:

“What kind of an amoral ideologue still supports a politician who has had FIVE campaign officials plead guilty to federal charges?”

or, updated:

What kind of an amoral ideologue still supports the confirmation onto the SCOTUS of an attempted rapist?

Or in your case: What kind of amoral ideologue supports Robespierre justice to derail the confirmation of a eminently qualified justice to the SCOTUS?

Flagpole wrote:

Back Peddler Flagpole wrote:

no, you said he'd be impeached. liar, liar, liar...back peddler.

What about this doesn't say that - "He will resign because he will be told that the Senate has the votes to convict him after the House has impeached him, though it is possible he will hang on and actually let the Senate remove him from office."

Read this part slowly..."after the House has impeached him..."

Good lord.

Better watch it there Flagpole. That is taking the lord's name in vain. Fat Hurts might be getting his panties all bunched up.

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Name wrote:

Or, as agip says about your kind:

“What kind of an amoral ideologue still supports a politician who has had FIVE campaign officials plead guilty to federal charges?”

or, updated:

What kind of an amoral ideologue still supports the confirmation onto the SCOTUS of an attempted rapist?

Or in your case: What kind of amoral ideologue supports Robespierre justice to derail the confirmation of a eminently qualified justice to the SCOTUS?

Pretty sure that nobody is talking about cutting anyone's head off here. Also pretty sure that there are credible allegations of attempted rape involved.

Care to try again?

Fat hurts wrote:

BTW, I just heard an explanation for Lindsey Graham's 180 on Trump.

Rumor has it that he wants to be Attorney General when Sessions gets fired.

Graham and Trump are buddies now. Graham is definitely expecting something for his relentless loyalty. He will either be a VP pick if things sour with Pence or AG as you mentioned. Total sellout.

Trollminator wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

BTW, I just heard an explanation for Lindsey Graham's 180 on Trump.

Rumor has it that he wants to be Attorney General when Sessions gets fired.

Graham and Trump are buddies now. Graham is definitely expecting something for his relentless loyalty. He will either be a VP pick if things sour with Pence or AG as you mentioned. Total sellout.

Serious question: Do you think that there are any politicians (and yes, Trump is a politician) in the House, Senate or POTUS who would not sell their own soul for reelection/coveted appointment/power?

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Says it all:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/27/lindsey-graham-tears-into-democrats-over-sham-kavanaugh-hearing.html

Graham stepped in to cut into the Dems momentum - Durbin was killing Kav. Graham is scum of the earth, only speaking to the base with his antics.

Name wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Or in your case: What kind of amoral ideologue supports Robespierre justice to derail the confirmation of a eminently qualified justice to the SCOTUS?

Pretty sure that nobody is talking about cutting anyone's head off here. Also pretty sure that there are credible allegations of attempted rape involved.

Care to try again?

I don’t have to try anything since the facts support Kavanaugh. Robespierre justice is all you got. As Senator Graham said “all you want is power, and God I hope you never get it.”

Trollminator wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Says it all:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/27/lindsey-graham-tears-into-democrats-over-sham-kavanaugh-hearing.html

Graham stepped in to cut into the Dems momentum - Durbin was killing Kav. Graham is scum of the earth, only speaking to the base with his antics.

Funny really, as if the weasel family of Durbin, Booker, Harris, Feinstein, and Blumenthal were not talking to their base.

The weasels tried their best and lost.

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Robespierre justice is all you got.

Robespierre died in 1794. How old are you? Pretty old it seems.

Maximilien Marie Isidore Robespierre wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Robespierre justice is all you got.

Robespierre died in 1794. How old are you? Pretty old it seems.

Mob justice has no time stamp.

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Maximilien Marie Isidore Robespierre wrote:

Robespierre died in 1794. How old are you? Pretty old it seems.

Mob justice has no time stamp.

You are babbling.

Maximilien Marie Isidore Robespierre wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Mob justice has no time stamp.

You are babbling.

And you have nothing intelligent to post

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Name wrote:

Or, as agip says about your kind:

“What kind of an amoral ideologue still supports a politician who has had FIVE campaign officials plead guilty to federal charges?”

or, updated:

What kind of an amoral ideologue still supports the confirmation onto the SCOTUS of an attempted rapist?

Or in your case: What kind of amoral ideologue supports Robespierre justice to derail the confirmation of a eminently qualified justice to the SCOTUS?

Ask yourself what has been stopping a Republican majority Senate from confirming BK over the last couple of weeks... they could have called the vote for any day with no delay, why did they push it off? The Democrats have no impact on their vote. The other question you should be asking is if he is really eminently qualified, specially after today’s antics - attacking the Dems and referring to deep state conspiracy and the “Clinton’s revenge”. Doesn’t sound at all like an objective and qualified judge to me. Besides, we heard a very credible account from Ford today, definitely warrants an investigation - BK should not be afraid of that but he was lashing out at the thought.