Trump: Mr. Family Values.
The Trump administration last month testified it lost track of 20% — or nearly 1,500 children — of the undocumented minors that had been in its custody over a three-month period.
Exactly what has Trump do with these lost children? Does he need that many to satisfy him?
http://www.startribune.com/the-latest-fed-agency-says-it-lost-track-of-migrant-kids/480986621/
Flagpole wrote:
1) It is doubtful that Mueller told him that. No verification from Mueller on that, and most who know Mueller have said they don't believe he would say that. So, we'll see on that one.
While I share a distrust of what Giuliani would say, there isn't going to be either refutation or confirmation of what Giuliani's conversation with Mueller would be. Giuliani knows this and thus is free to say what he wishes just to put it out there perhaps as a PR move only.
2) There are many who believe a sitting president CAN be indicted and that it would hold up when tested. The issue might be that there can't be a trial while the president is in office, but indictments could be made if for no other reason than to make sure a statute of limitations doesn't pass.
Mueller may have said that he won't indict the POTUS (or words to that effect) rather than "can't". Justice Dept guidelines would support no indictment even if it is legally possible. The legality would likely subject to a time consuming review which I'm not sure the SC or country would be prepared to undergo.
One question is whether a subpoena can be acted upon if a charge cannot be filed (indictment). This could potentially protect the POTUS from a sit-down with he SC if it cannot be issued.
This is your role model, Republicans?
1) Grab them by the pu$sy.
2) Refuse to pay the price you agreed for pianos from a guy who operates a small business.
3) Chicken out of fighting for your country.
4) "Trade up and younger" when you get bored of your wife.
5) Cheat on your multiple spouses.
6) Better yet, bareback a porn star while your wife is pregnant.
And we're not even talking about all of the terrible things he's done with foreign governments. Trump is indefensible.
Giuliani's recent comments are a clear sign of desperation. They want to discredit Mueller badly. Obviously, Mueller made no such direct qualification as to whether the President could be indicted. He would have had zero reason to make such statement, especially to Trump's legal team. How desperate do you have to be when you are publicly putting words in other people's mouths? He knows Mueller can't and won't speak publicly about the investigation, so this amounts to a very weak sucker punch. It's not a bad move though, if Mueller were to make any statement to set the record on what he actually said, Giuliani would have successfully lured him into the spotlight and he would be totally politicalized. That Mueller tattoo is definitely due.
Flagpole wrote:
Honshu wrote:
Nope. I reject that.
Well, you would be wrong. I already set the criteria for my pronouncement in the lead up to the election.
Then why did you admit on this board the day after the election that you were wrong.
Don't ever go away. You provide so much entertainment. We all know you are just a troll - no one could EVER be this crazy.
Noticer of baloney wrote:
Roger Dodger wrote:
HAHAHAHAHA!! He's STILL TALKING!!
Good lord, man, get a grip and find some hobbies. You were wrong about the election. Now you're wrong about Mueller taking Trump down. Just stop, log off, and go away for a long, long time.
This is THE reason people can't stand Liberals- You're SO stubborn. You can't admit you don't know what you're talking about, so you continue to double, triple, quadruple down. It is literally the definition of insanity. You're not going to change reality by posting more.
Needless to say at this point, but:
Mueller never (per ROBERT MUELLER himself).
Clownpole forever (per the actions of Clownpole himself).
^Nothing of substance as usual. Flagpole is going to own this message board.
^One day you are going to run out of names for your aliases, brother.
CNN article:
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein publicly discussed the issue earlier this month at an event held by the Freedom Forum Institute. He was asked if a sitting president can be indicted.
"I'm not going to answer this in the context of any current matters, so you shouldn't draw any inference about it," Rosenstein said. "But the Department of Justice has in the past, when the issue arose, has opined that a sitting President cannot be indicted. There's been a lot of speculation in the media about this, I just don't have anything more to say about it." Rosenstein oversees the special counsel probe.
The first sentence is key.
Funny how far the goalposts have shifted since early 2017. From no involvement with Russians to a sitting president cannot be indicted AND there is nothing illegal to colluding with the Russians.
nontrumper wrote:
CNN article:
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein publicly discussed the issue earlier this month at an event held by the Freedom Forum Institute. He was asked if a sitting president can be indicted.
"I'm not going to answer this in the context of any current matters, so you shouldn't draw any inference about it," Rosenstein said. "But the Department of Justice has in the past, when the issue arose, has opined that a sitting President cannot be indicted. There's been a lot of speculation in the media about this, I just don't have anything more to say about it." Rosenstein oversees the special counsel probe.
The first sentence is key.
Funny how far the goalposts have shifted since early 2017. From no involvement with Russians to a sitting president cannot be indicted AND there is nothing illegal to colluding with the Russians.
Of course he’s going to say that. He’s just another Drumpf shill.
Another Trumpette (Aaron Schlossberg) lets his guard down.
http://hollywoodlife.com/2018/05/17/who-is-aaron-schlossberg-lawyer/
"Your staff is speaking Spanish to customers when they should be speaking English. Every person I listened to [pointing] he spoke it, he spoke it, she’s speaking it. It’s America. I will be following up. My guess is, they’re not documented. So my next call is to ICE to have each one of those kicked out of my country. They may have the balls to come here and live off my money. I paid for my welfare, I pay for their ability to live here. So the least they could do is speak English. If you’re running a place in midtown Manhattan, the people should be speaking English, not Spanish.”
///
This was not the first time he was caught slamming foreigners, either. In 2016, he was caught calling a stranger an “ugly f***ing foreigner” on video after they accidentally bumped into each other on the street. That video has now resurfaced amidst the latest scandal.
Flagpole wrote:
On the Bevel wrote:
No. The joke you made has been historically used as a homophobic (homophonic not withstanding) slur. An attempt to belittle someone because of one's belief that being homosexual makes one inferior.
Sorry. No gray area on this one.
Nope. I reject that.
I don’t think you intended that statement to be homophobic, but there is no doubt that it is.
Be more careful with your words in the future and...
Mueller is coming.
Gheclown is done.
Noticer of aliases wrote:
Noticer of baloney wrote:
^Nothing of substance as usual. Flagpole is going to own this message board.
^One day you are going to run out of names for your aliases, brother.
^Nothing burger and off base as usual. Flagpole RULES.
Trump had someone illegally erase some suspicious activity reports (SARs) from the government's database. The SARs were related to Cohen, and seem to be linked to hiding (washing) money.
“I have never seen something pulled off the system,” a whistleblower said. “That system is a safeguard for the bank. It’s a stockpile of information. When something’s not there that should be, that is a cause of concern.”
Noticer of baloney wrote:
Noticer of aliases wrote:
^One day you are going to run out of names for your aliases, brother.
^Nothing burger and off base as usual. Flagpole RULES.
I guess you could put “noticer” in front of everything a create even more, brother.
Roger Dodger wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
My statement during the campaign was that Trump had ZERO chance to win. I qualified that with two things 1) that he didn't cheat in any way, and 2) that aliens didn't come down here and make us vote for him.
So, if cheating by Trump or his associates is proven, then I will have been right about the election, for cheaters can not be winners (see Olympians stripped of their medals after winning when caught cheating -- an example I provided during the run up to the election).
HAHAHAHAHA!! He's STILL TALKING!!
Good lord, man, get a grip and find some hobbies. You were wrong about the election. Now you're wrong about Mueller taking Trump down. Just stop, log off, and go away for a long, long time.
This is THE reason people can't stand Liberals- You're SO stubborn. You can't admit you don't know what you're talking about, so you continue to double, triple, quadruple down. It is literally the definition of insanity. You're not going to change reality by posting more.
Needless to say at this point, but:
Mueller never (per ROBERT MUELLER himself).
Clownpole forever (per the actions of Clownpole himself).
1) As of now I remain wrong about the election. Once collusion (conspiracy) with Russia is proven, I will be right about the election.
2) Last I checked, there is still an investigation going on...I can't be wrong until the investigation is over and Trump has been proven clean.
3) Dude, you are wrong about Mueller. It is possible (still not verified that Mueller said this) that Mueller will not indict Trump while he is a sitting President (though it is a DOJ rule today), but what he uncovers could lead to his impeachment and conviction or his resignation, or if it takes long enough and Trump is no longer President, he could indict him then, OR he could indict now and push the trial off until he is no longer President...this would likely go up to the Supreme Court, and that would likely be acceptable to them. So, jury is still out on what Mueller can and will provide.
Do know...
Mueller is coming (along with others...will be a race to see who the first one to take Trump down is).
The clown is done.
Admission wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Well, you would be wrong. I already set the criteria for my pronouncement in the lead up to the election.
Then why did you admit on this board the day after the election that you were wrong.
Don't ever go away. You provide so much entertainment. We all know you are just a troll - no one could EVER be this crazy.
I admitted I was wrong the day after the election because I was wrong and I have integrity. I did not believe at that point that Trump had cheated. I STILL say I am wrong today, because his cheating has not yet been made public (though I do believe Mueller has evidence of that and will present that). When it is proven that Trump cheated, I will at that point be proven right about the election. I wasn't expecting that to be the case, but the case and the facts have led us here.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Trumpers: Pay attention.
Trump loses track of 1500 children he separated from families wrote:
Trump: Mr. Family Values.
The Trump administration last month testified it lost track of 20% — or nearly 1,500 children — of the undocumented minors that had been in its custody over a three-month period.
Exactly what has Trump done with these lost children? Does he need that many to satisfy him?
http://www.startribune.com/the-latest-fed-agency-says-it-lost-track-of-migrant-kids/480986621/
nontrumper wrote:
CNN article:
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein publicly discussed the issue earlier this month at an event held by the Freedom Forum Institute. He was asked if a sitting president can be indicted.
"I'm not going to answer this in the context of any current matters, so you shouldn't draw any inference about it," Rosenstein said. "But the Department of Justice has in the past, when the issue arose, has opined that a sitting President cannot be indicted. There's been a lot of speculation in the media about this, I just don't have anything more to say about it." Rosenstein oversees the special counsel probe.
The first sentence is key.
Funny how far the goalposts have shifted since early 2017. From no involvement with Russians to a sitting president cannot be indicted AND there is nothing illegal to colluding with the Russians.
AND, Kellyanne Conway said in a television interview (paraphrased), "There is no evidence of collusion that affected the outcome of the election". Ha! THAT is not the test. There doesn't have to be proof that the collusion affected the outcome of the election, only that it occurred! She KNOWS there was collusion and that's why she said it that way. From her it used to be "no collusion, no collusion".
Pence is working behind the scenes to gain some support so that he can be an effective President.
They know Trump is going down.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
anti-trumpter wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Nope. I reject that.
I don’t think you intended that statement to be homophobic, but there is no doubt that it is.
Be more careful with your words in the future and...
Mueller is coming.
Gheclown is done.
If you are waiting for an admission and apology from Flagpole, you’ll be waiting a LONG time.
RIP: D3 All-American Frank Csorba - who ran 13:56 in March - dead
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06
I’m a D2 female runner. Our coach explicitly told us not to visit LetsRun forums.
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
Hats off to my dad. He just ran a 1:42 Half Marathon and turns 75 in 2 months!
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday