McLaren Report Pt. 2 out--details Russian doping

uhm, er.. wrote:

I would not be surprised if they never stopped post-Soviet Union. Why would they have stopped?

Of course they didn't.

uhm, er.. wrote:In fact, I doubt they stopped. It's just taken all these years to catch them out.

Exactly.

uhm, er.. wrote:Bread and circuses. Millions of Russian sports fans duped into thinking there athletes were superior. Sheeesh.

Well, the irony here is that the Russians were actually not superior, at least not to other big countries. See e.g. the medal count of the 2012 Olympics. So either:

a) there is also systematic doping in China, the UK and US etc.

or

b) systematic doping is irrelevant.

I'll go with a), supported by the observations of the 80s.

Shawty Varacelli wrote:

crapoutofmouth wrote:

When will there be an "investigation" of UK and US doping? Or the myriad of other suspicious countries? Oh, I guess that wouldn't fit in the the whole Russia witch hunt thing though...

http://www.impact-jeux-londres.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Darya-Pischalnikova-%C2%A9myakinchenko1.jpg

FloJo dead.

Woman that look like man shafted by Russkies for squealing.

casual obsever wrote:

uhm, er.. wrote:

I would not be surprised if they never stopped post-Soviet Union. Why would they have stopped?

Of course they didn't.

uhm, er.. wrote:In fact, I doubt they stopped. It's just taken all these years to catch them out.

Exactly.

uhm, er.. wrote:Bread and circuses. Millions of Russian sports fans duped into thinking there athletes were superior. Sheeesh.

Well, the irony here is that the Russians were actually not superior, at least not to other big countries. See e.g. the medal count of the 2012 Olympics. So either:

a) there is also systematic doping in China, the UK and US etc.

or

b) systematic doping is irrelevant.

I'll go with a), supported by the observations of the 80s.

This is why it was laughable for me when Armstrong was said by authorities to have had the most sophisticated doping system in history. Not even close. I would add Germany to those countries that never stopped doping, though their results have been more noticable in the Winter Olympics than summer.

Nonsense.

There is nothing to see here. This is all old news.

http://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/4/590x/secondary/Diack-Bach-Blatter-399725.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/04/02/18/32C743EC00000578-0-Steve_Cram_and_Paula_Radcliffe_hang_on_the_words_of_their_good_f-a-15_1459618151759.jpg

http://eightlane.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Seb-Coe-and-Paula-Radcliffe.jpg

Paula and Seb like to have brunch in Monte Carlo, Monaco at 11:00am on Sunday.

Why is Steve Cram in Monte Carlo for brunch?

Wait for it...

Wait for it...

YESS! aduckk2022, you are my favorite. Tide goes in, tide goes, out, and aduck2022 reminds everyone about IGF-1 LR3.

10 years from now, after parliamentary hearings and congressional panels, LRC will be recalling "yeah, that one guy called it, IGF-1!"

The funny thing is, it sounds like I'm being facetious. But this dude gets it. Keep on the good fight aduck2022.

aduck2022 wrote:

more fakenews !!!!!!!!

with a link from fakebook

from anglo-american imperialist rats .

the lies are just getting more and more desperate

mclaren is absolutely a shill and bought and paid for

and should stick to formula 1 ....... lol

i never believed the " hole in wall story to get at samples " one bit .

i would rank pizzagate as alot more plausible.

and maybe because it has some truth that they have to up the anti and

beat this fakenews drum .

First of all ducky, Richard McLaren is a Canadian Law Professor and the late Bruce McLaren was a New Zealand Formula One ace-turned F1 boss.

The pizza gate is totally weird but it isn't really a poster boy for anything, but the hole in the wall is so hilarious.

But, but it says on my notes Formula 1. No hole in the wall, American propagandiist

Clerk,You often strike me as smarter than that. I do not argue against 150 page detailed reports with evidence and extensive scrutiny by a panel of experts, but rather rely on them to support my arguments. I give these kinds of extensive reports more weight than non-professional analysis from UK newspapers, and non-expert forum dwellers.After the first hand testimonies from the Stepanovas, the Shobukhovas, and Rodchenkov, and the findings of the first McClaren report, which was both hurried to meet a pre-Olympic deadline, and came to late, I'm not surprised to learn that the scope extends to other athletes, in other Olympic events.So long as arguments stay directly connected to authoritative findings backed by direct evidence, you will not find me arguing against them.

Clerk wrote:

When should we expect the rekrunner report, saying it's not as bad as it looks?