FitzyXC wrote:
ItsBaddude wrote:Very priceless considering that libs use the opposite argument to allow refugees from lawless/terrorists countries. Allow them in because according to the current stats they are harmless.
There is no solid evidence that letting in Random Vetted Syrian Guy (and contrary to your news sources there is/has been a thorough vetting process, though obviously not perfect as perfection is pretty much impossible here) will lead to a terror attack. There is pretty solid evidence that continuously pumping sh*t into the atmosphere might do some damage. Likewise with spending money you don't have.
The "other side" also claims there is no solid evidence that we need to worry about it. They also claim the data presented by global warming fanatics has not been vetted properly, contrary to your news sources.
Think about what you are saying. How can you be so sure you are right and others are wrong? To the casual observer, it seems like a circular argument. No consistency at all.
We are all full of sh*t!