Looks like Ohio State knifer was a Muslim refugee from Somali. Tell me again why we are allowing these into US?

DiscoGary wrote:

Jimmy the Macedonian wrote:

Within any population, there is going to be violence.

So why are Americans tolerant of white nationalist violence, but completely intolerant of violence when it involves muslims?

^ This is why Trump won.

^ This is why Clinton lost.

Jimmy the Macedonian wrote:

Majority of fatal attacks on U.S. soil carried out by white supremacists, not terrorists

In the 14 years since the Sept. 11 terror attacks, nearly twice as many people have been killed in the United States by white supremacists and anti-government radicals than by Muslim jihadis, according to a new study.

White supremacists and anti-government radicals have killed 48 Americans, including last week’s deadly attack in South Carolina, versus 26 killings by Muslim radicals, according to a count by New America, a Washington research center.

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jun/24/majority-of-fatal-attacks-on-us-soil-carried-out-b/

The Orlando night club guy killed 49 by himself. I thinking that "study" may have left out some data?

There are good people of every nationality, race, religion, etc. There are bad people of every nationality, race, religion, etc. Doesn't matter if you are white, black, Asian, American, Catholic, Muslim, whatever.

DiscoGary wrote:

Jimmy the Macedonian wrote:

Within any population, there is going to be violence.

So why are Americans tolerant of white nationalist violence, but completely intolerant of violence when it involves muslims?

^ This is why Trump won.

In America, you have a better chance of being struck by lightening than death by RADICAL ISLAMIC TERROR!!!! Trump will stop immigration from these countries, but your life won't change for the better, because it was never impacted to begin with.

The cost of this emotion-based vote for Trump will be slashed taxes on the liberal elite 1%ers at the expense of the white working class. The benefit (for Trumpkins) will be that Muslims will remain 1% of the population, as opposed to growing to 1.01% under Hillary's plan.

In four years you won't be able to blame others for your economic failures as you've done in the past. You'll be forced to accept personal responsibility for a change.

MeHereYouWhere?! wrote:

There are good people of every nationality, race, religion, etc. There are bad people of every nationality, race, religion, etc. Doesn't matter if you are white, black, Asian, American, Catholic, Muslim, whatever.

Trouble is, while there are good and bad individuals in every demographic, the proportion of good to bad has been seen by the public as the Muslims being more likely to be extremists and terrorists. I never see a Mennonite carriage and think 'oh shit, he might have a bomb vest,' because it would be ridiculous. The same thought is far more justifiable if one was thinking it about a bearded man with a turban praising allah.

MeHereYouWhere?! wrote:

There are good people of every nationality, race, religion, etc. There are bad people of every nationality, race, religion, etc. Doesn't matter if you are white, black, Asian, American, Catholic, Muslim, whatever.

Some religions have a higher proportion of bad people than others.

There are 100 times as many white people in the USA as Religion of Peace adherents yet the latter commit a majority of terrorist acts.

There's a reason "Hinduphobia" doesn't exist.

Red Pill Giver wrote:

MeHereYouWhere?! wrote:

There are good people of every nationality, race, religion, etc. There are bad people of every nationality, race, religion, etc. Doesn't matter if you are white, black, Asian, American, Catholic, Muslim, whatever.

Some religions have a higher proportion of bad people than others.

There are 100 times as many white people in the USA as Religion of Peace adherents yet the latter commit a majority of terrorist acts.

There's a reason "Hinduphobia" doesn't exist.

+1 my thoughts exactly

Jimmy the Macedonian wrote:

Majority of fatal attacks on U.S. soil carried out by white supremacists, not terrorists

In the 14 years since the Sept. 11 terror attacks, nearly twice as many people have been killed in the United States by white supremacists and anti-government radicals than by Muslim jihadis, according to a new study.

White supremacists and anti-government radicals have killed 48 Americans, including last week’s deadly attack in South Carolina, versus 26 killings by Muslim radicals, according to a count by New America, a Washington research center.

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jun/24/majority-of-fatal-attacks-on-us-soil-carried-out-b/

What does the data say when you start the kill count the day before 9/11?

Keep out the Muzzie refugees.

All religion is a threat to the human race. When will we just grow up and realize there are no magic deities living in the sky or under the sea.

Until we can unite together in a secular society, war, shootings, and prejudice will continue.

Lover of deflections wrote:

Well done! Let me play!

Majority of cat food eaten by cats.

Wrong! Raccoons and Dogs actually eat more. Cats are picky.

Lone gunners wrote:

There have been about 20 mass shootings in the past 5 years. And while there has been an uptick in Muslim involvement in the past 2 years, most are not affiliated with that religion. If go back through the history loners, nihilists, and white supremacists are the most common suspects.

But what the heck, let's just arm everyone to the teeth, maybe make carry permits mandatory for every male citizen.

Would make WAY more sense to make it mandatory for every FEMALE citizen to be trained in, own and carry a firearm.

songbird slayer wrote:

Lover of deflections wrote:

Well done! Let me play!

Majority of cat food eaten by cats.

Wrong! Raccoons and Dogs actually eat more. Cats are picky.

Unlike everyone else here, I can admit when I was wrong. I'm sorry. Well done.

lightning guy wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

^ This is why Trump won.

In America, you have a better chance of being struck by lightening than death by RADICAL ISLAMIC TERROR!!!! Trump will stop immigration from these countries, but your life won't change for the better, because it was never impacted to begin with.

The cost of this emotion-based vote for Trump will be slashed taxes on the liberal elite 1%ers at the expense of the white working class. The benefit (for Trumpkins) will be that Muslims will remain 1% of the population, as opposed to growing to 1.01% under Hillary's plan.

In four years you won't be able to blame others for your economic failures as you've done in the past. You'll be forced to accept personal responsibility for a change.

How naive!

There is absolutely no limit to people's ability to blame others for their own failures. In four years there will be some of the same bogeymen, some new bogeymen, and nobody taking a good long look at themselves as accountable for their own failures.

Lover of deflections wrote:

songbird slayer wrote:

Wrong! Raccoons and Dogs actually eat more. Cats are picky.

Unlike everyone else here, I can admit when I was wrong. I'm sorry. Well done.

OK, then prove it.

Clearly it is NOT true that everyone else here is unable to admit when they are wrong. This fact makes you wrong again. So please admit it.

This ^

Throughout history, when average people are struggling, elites (republicans as of recent history) have always pointed the finger at the funny people, whether is was the irish, italian, blacks, muslims etc.

Then, when the uninformed are getting their panties in a bunch, the elites enrich themselves even more. In the case of the republican party, it's through tax cuts on the rich, which you better believe are coming.

lightning guy wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

^ This is why Trump won.

In America, you have a better chance of being struck by lightening than death by RADICAL ISLAMIC TERROR!!!! Trump will stop immigration from these countries, but your life won't change for the better, because it was never impacted to begin with.

The cost of this emotion-based vote for Trump will be slashed taxes on the liberal elite 1%ers at the expense of the white working class. The benefit (for Trumpkins) will be that Muslims will remain 1% of the population, as opposed to growing to 1.01% under Hillary's plan.

In four years you won't be able to blame others for your economic failures as you've done in the past. You'll be forced to accept personal responsibility for a change.

I wouldn't hold my breath, remember who you're dealing with here.

[quote]OK Then wrote:

[quote]Lover of deflections wrote:

OK, then prove it.

Clearly it is NOT true that everyone else here is unable to admit when they are wrong. This fact makes you wrong again. So please admit it.

You need to provide evidence of someone admitting he or she is wrong. Saying "Clearly it is not true" is not evidence.

Let's test this. Admit you are wrong -- and then you will prove your assertion.

Jimmy the Macedonian wrote:

Lover of deflections wrote:

Well done! Let me play!

Majority of cat food eaten by cats.

Within any population, there is going to be violence.

So why are Americans tolerant of white nationalist violence, but completely intolerant of violence when it involves muslims?

Which Americans are tolerant of white nationalist violence???

Is that true or just another de facto lie from the progressive left that slowly seeps into the popular conscious to the point where citizens believe there is a unreconciled wrong with all who disagree?

His dad supported HRC wrote:

Jimmy the Macedonian wrote:http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jun/24/majority-of-fatal-attacks-on-us-soil-carried-out-b/

The Orlando night club guy killed 49 by himself. I thinking that "study" may have left out some data?

The Washington Post has some warped definitions that need to be addressed by its readership.

Remember when we were having "nearly one mass shooting every day"? Their definition was at least 4 people wounded by gun fire - a tragedy but not what most people would call a mass shooting.

I'd be interested in how this, again, blatantly-liberal publication comes to their definition of "white supremacists".

Not everyone holding a Confederate flag is a white supremacist.