Thank you for this suggestion! This is an excellent idea. Being inspired by the best in the state.
Thank you for this suggestion! This is an excellent idea. Being inspired by the best in the state.
I'm very against special privileges to top 7. I advanced the top 10 to post-season and made making top 10 a certain number of times in the season a point towards lettering.
We used this exact strategy to win our conference. They knew they needed to be ahead of a certain team and which members of that team would be closest to them. Pretty much stalked them and then hawked them down at the end of the race. It was amazing to watch. I'll use that strategy more in the future.
It helps that I rank all the teams going into a meet and I know which ones we need to beat. So they can narrow down the uniforms and I can shout something like "red and blue 5 spots ahead!" and they go after them.
Yes, I agree the pack only works with similar ability. We definitely have this.
I've run high school and college cross country (NAIA and DII), observed DI cross country for 15 years and have coached high school for two years and I have NEVER seen something like you described. Trips happen but it is not intentional and simply a result of a stacked and crowded field.
I'm not sure why you are so passionate about this. I don't think you have had much experience with high school cross country and definitely not with a girls team.
The girls are very close in talent and prs. Top 5 within 30 seconds and top 10 just outside a minute. But the top few girls like their pecking order and would push the pace in a packing workout to drop their peers. Push the pace as in they are going TOO FAST not just for their teammates but for themselves as well. That is why the crying ensued. I separated into further packs and it was better but not great. My main observation is that there are some egos getting in the way and hurting the team approach.
Yes, it is definitely cliques. Friends want to run only with friends, not with the girl who was talking to the ex at the spaghetti dinner (horrors).
Oh, and 14:58 would be one of the best high school runners in the country. Don't think we'll produce that anytime soon.
You should stay in the main forum. I feel like I'm wasting time explaining this to you and you didn't have any good advice.
No, my advice is excellent, and your approach is wrong. You are using the boys team as an example to the girls team, and those girls all (rightly so) think you are a fool for doing so because they are not as close in ability as your boys team. That kind of approach doesn't work in parenting or in coaching. I hope you don't call it a "packing workout" to the girls. That actually sets the tone for competition in the workout, because they think, 'ok, I'll show you who the best in this pack is' because it implies that you might want them to run as a pack in the meets. They are TRAINING GROUPS. If you have girls of similar ability in a workout and they don't do what you tell them to do, then that goes to your leadership. They are not allowed to push the pace. You tell them that if they run X at the next meet, perhaps the workouts will change accordingly or a girl might move up to another training group. Until then, they need to run what you tell them. You sound like you are afraid of them. You can be a coach and be nice at the same time.
Yes, 14:58 would be one of the best freshmen in the country. Outliers happen and that's the point. You can have 4 girls run a workout together, and you tell them, "Mindy Sue and Chantilly Lace, the two of you run these 400s in 90 seconds. Flobotta and Willa Jane, you two run them in 95. No pace pushers! We are training to run faster on race day, not to beat teammates in workouts. Your standing on the team only counts with regard to how you do on Saturday."
And, if there are girls who only want to run with their friends, then don't ever expect anything from them.
Utah Girl Chronicles wrote:
When I was a freshman in HS, my teammates and I watched our varsity get absolutely smoked by the #1 team in the country in a dual meet (there were "mythical" national champions back then). We saw cross-country at an elite level and it was a thing of beauty, man. Watching that team made so much of an impression on us that forty years later, our team still runs in a tight pack despite being spread out all over the country.
http://www.utahgirlchronicles.com
What you saw was a team jogging together because they had no competition, not a team "packing" to have a better outcome.
Always remember, you NEVER know how fast the winner in a race is capable of running. Only in defeat will their true limit be shown.
Still no good advice on how to convince them packing up is good for the team so you should just not post. The advice you did give is basic coaching. Training groups and trying to get them to not push the pace. It's a little more complicated when you're trying to pay attention to 40 kids and their workouts.
I won't change my ideas on packing up. It isn't unique to me at all. All of the good high school teams in the state train their teams like this and the clinics that I've been to advise us to use this approach. The coaches and programs that I'm emulating are much more experienced than I am and I agree with them 100 percent.
I don't get the impression that you are familiar with xc coaching at all.
You can't force a group to "pack up". They have to want to "pack up", specifically the lagging runners need to have the fight and competitiveness.
That's the thing with packs, each member has a different motivation. The best runner has to have a team mentality, changing their running still to help others, and be confident enough in their ability to overcome that modification. Or confident enough in the pack, that they believe that they are helped by it.
The middle runners need to do their jobs as well. Middle runners need to encourage, and position themselves so that the back runners don't lose contact.
And the back runners need to be willing to run over their ability, and realize that its either feast or famine, they will hang-on and run a good time or die and really hurt at the end.
...My guess is you don't have very competitive 5 runners, and your front runners aren't confident in their ability. Sounds like a young or inexperienced team.
Correct, no real standouts in either boys or girls varsity. All quite close in talent level. The girls are young and historically the program favors an underdog attitude, especially among the girls. The most consistent advice that I've gotten from this thread is that I need to work on their confidence. Definitely will be focusing on that next year.
No direct coaching experience, just observational:
"Packing up" tends to have to come from the girls themselves. There are ways to encourage it, but girls can be finicky.
My daughter runs for a historically good cross country team. This year, the girls have an excellent rapport. There are no real standouts, the top girl is being recruited by an excellent D1 school, but the other senior at the team is solid but not a star. However, their top seven girls have about a 60 second spread in races and have been really impressive this season, winning merges in huge invitationals. The next three runners are also pretty strong, so the top 10 trains together. Last year, the story was different. There was an exceptional top runner and a solid second runner but the next 5 were nowhere near these two. Added to that is that the top girl was a bit of a diva, HAD to win every race, even dual meets, never allowed anyone else to lead in practice and generally was not a team player. It was a pretty miserable season.
The coaches encouraged bonding by having the girls rotate hosting spaghetti dinners the night before meets, attending the same summer camp, and participating in captain's practices throughout the summer. The girls wear their uniform to school the day of meets or they dress alike, things like that helped them form a team identity. Girls need that kind of thing to keep them together I think. But again, if there is a divisive personality or personalities, it can be hard to galvanize the all for one and one for all mentality.
Seems much too late in the season to try various workouts that might help these girls run together. Here are a few suggestions that would probably work better early season and then could be built upon throughout:
Long intervals where the stated goal is to run a particular time, set so that it is relatively easy for the #5 girl, even with a short rest period. For each interval, select a different girl to lead, with instructions that no one can pass her. Start from the back - #5 leads first, #4 second, etc. Make certain every runner understands that the goal pace is more important in this workout than running faster than goal pace.
Variation on above. Same workout strategy, only last quarter of each long interval can be run faster and individually, with all knowing that short rest will be a problem for anyone running too fast. With this workout, you get packing for most of each interval and the faster girls get to run faster at the end.
Shorter intervals in which the goal pace again is set for #5 runner and the group goal is to finish together. Could be run in a line with instructions not to pass.
If there's a way to make these workouts a "game" of sorts - trying to hit the goal exactly - that might encourage packing.
Reading these over, they do seem like early season workouts.
I like the rotating spaghetti dinners. Our spaghetti dinners are more formal and planned weeks in advance with only a couple a season.
I really like the run in a line and no passing workout suggestion along with asking for a very specific pace. Yes, more early season but I'm getting advice for next year so that's fine.
It is IMPOSSIBLE to get good advice on how to implement a TERRIBLE idea.
Packing up is not crucial. I never did it in ten years of coaching and we did quite well. It's more important to teach them race strategy. Unfortunately many coaches do not understand this well and say things like "you have to go out hard." What does that even mean?
All I know is it's more fun to pass than it is to be passed. Let the fools start out too fast.
I coached a competitive boys and girls program for 20 years.
If you don't give the girls enough attention (I mean ALL of your attention) they complain. If you give them too much attention they complain.
They complain- the 8th runner will complain that she's not in the top 7. The slower runners will blame you because they're not as fast as the faster runners (who you are also coaching- it's not you, they have natural ability, but it IS you that they're slow).
When they don't get injured you're not working them hard enough, when they DO get injured it's because YOU work them too hard.
The key is having a positive leader on the team- it's better when it's not the #1 runner.
I had girls get scholarships- one didn't get me involved in the process at all. One tried to get me to coach at the college who gave her a full ride.
Most others who got college money were very appreciative.