Media Never "Fact Checks" Democrats

That's not even vaguely true. But knock yourself out. Seriously, literally knock yourself out.

Thanks For Stuff wrote:

That's not even vaguely true. But knock yourself out. Seriously, literally knock yourself out.

They will not have non-stop "fact check" articles during the democrat convention. The bias is sickening.

Went to the media

They said "we don't needya"

Then the liberals got butthurt (butthurt)

So I puts 'em in a sweatshirt

(Sweatshirt?) Yes, Burt!

That's the words that you heard!

Everybody, if you smell what I'm cookin'

Say "The media is bad! Police are violent!"

Everybody, if you smell what's crackalackin'

Say "Trump is the media! And we is wildin'!"

Wildin' Wilidin', Scott MF Weiland

Wildin' Wildin', Scott MF Weiland!

Stone Temple Pilots, are elegant bachelors

They're foxy to me, are they foxy to you?

The media wouldn't even fact check her plethora of email lies

The plain truth wrote:

The media wouldn't even fact check her plethora of email lies

Lies. Lies. Hillary Can't disguise.

Look into her eyes...that lady is a guy!

The American people are in for a surprise

When she spreads her thighs!

And shows her twig and berries!

Berries! Berries!

Tw-Tw-Tw-Tw-Tw-Tw-Tw-Tw-Tw-Twig and berries!

For the OP and like RWers here.

http://giphy.com/gifs/breaking-bad-flu-ugly-cry-131s7DE2m4UWwo

Suck failure, loser.

Thank you for being a pissboy.

Cankles '16 wrote:

Thank you for being a winner.

You're welcome.

TelingTheTruth wrote:

They never do. The media all in for Cankles Clinton.

Ask yourself, why doesn't fox news perform in depth fact checks? Could it be because conservatives tend to not care about facts as much as liberals? If you haven't realized this after 4 days of fact-less fear mongering and buffoonery, you belong at the convention.

They fact check and then realize what they say (most likely, not always, at least more truth than republicans) has some truth to it, so they don't make a story about it.

Hillary's top donors:

1. Spielburg;

2. Jeff Katzenburg;

3. Herbert Sandler;

4. Haim Saban;

5. Cheryl Saban;

6. Donald Sussman;

7. George Soros.

Any pattern here?

Just another republican claiming to be a victim. Same story every day.

Next you will start a thread about PC culture, insist people use your preferred word choice, and not see the irony.

Wrong. Right wing rags like the Washington Post call her out on her BS occasionally. She just doesn't produce as much of it as Bernie or Donald.

I could do this all day wrote:

TelingTheTruth wrote:

They never do. The media all in for Cankles Clinton.

Ask yourself, why doesn't fox news perform in depth fact checks? Could it be because conservatives tend to not care about facts as much as liberals? If you haven't realized this after 4 days of fact-less fear mongering and buffoonery, you belong at the convention.

Ah, you may be right, but does MSNBC not do the same on the other side of the ledger? But then, who watches MSNBC??

If you want to call a pot a kettle, don't throw stones at glass houses.

Cankles will be POTUS. Why getting into trouble already now?

You're one of those deniers when it's been proven over and over the media is uber liberal. Bernie Goldberg (a liberal) did an excellent jobs pointing this out in his book "Bias". Now days the media even admits they are liberal so checking facts against their favorite candidate will not happen.People like you are liars or know the truth and don't care.

Thanks For Stuff wrote:

That's not even vaguely true. But knock yourself out. Seriously, literally knock yourself out.

It is the RNC week. Yet you want the media shift the attention to H. Clinton. Is RNC that boring?! and NYTimes is right that this RNC is low energy?

Weird it is.

A GOP supporter not excited by his own party and has to look for it from outside the party.

FWIW I remember seeing an in-depth fact check when HRC, during primary season, said that she had a couple million more votes than Bernie.

As it turns out, she did (at that time--she got more of a lead later). But at least the outfit (one of those debunker sites--sorry, I don't know their names) took a hard look at what had seemed like a throwaway line.

I don't intend to vote for her or Trump, so feel like I can be somewhat objective in this.