Russell Westbrook Has Completely Wrecked Stephen Curry

berryberry wrote:

He's not the best player this post season. Whether that's because of injuries, a slump, or just good defense is up for debate, and since I don't know, I won't offer an opinion.

It's all about diminishing returns for players prone to leg injuries, like Curry. A half-step, even a quarter-step, off and the money shot doesn't go down.

Osama not Obama wrote:

Russell Westbrook is a black thug .I can't wait for random white cop shooting him in the temple

You misspelled Draymond "Nut Kicker" Green.

That guy... wrote:

Personally, I'd much rather see OKC face Lebron (assuming he makes it).

1. After this week, im worried that neither the Cavs nor the Warriors will make it

2. I wouldn't mind seeing Lebron vs OKC, but Lebron needs a rematch against the warriors first. Last finals wasn't really an fair competition because the Cavs were playing without THREE of their starters. I want to see both teams playing each other at their best.

;) wrote:

Boost wrote:

Curry is not anywhere near the best players in the world. He's a one dimensional shooter. Westbrook has made him look like trash.

Curry will go down as another Steve Nash. A great shooter and offensive player with athletic limitations and zero defense.

You are an idiot. Curry is still one of the greatest players in the world. Yes, Westbrook has completely outplayed him. That does happen. When Westbrook is healthy and on, he is also one of the greatest.

As for looking like trash:

.42 FG, .86 FT, 5.5R, 4.5A, 2 steals, 23.5ppg

That is not trash. You are pretty stupid.

As for defense ... Curry led the league in steals. Is that a pure measure of good defense? Of course not. But to say "zero defense" is indisputably stupid.

Naw, the stupid one looks like you. Curry has gotten obliterated by him.

Shahs wrote:

I wouldn't count Curry and the Warriors out yet, especially with the nba and refs on there side. Didn't the Cavs come back on the Spurs when they were down 3-1 or was it 3-2?

What?? LOL. The Cavs and Spurs have meet in the Finals only once, in 2007, and the Cavs were swept in 4 one sided games.

Human Torch wrote:

;) wrote:

You are an idiot. Curry is still one of the greatest players in the world. Yes, Westbrook has completely outplayed him. That does happen. When Westbrook is healthy and on, he is also one of the greatest.

As for looking like trash:

.42 FG, .86 FT, 5.5R, 4.5A, 2 steals, 23.5ppg

That is not trash. You are pretty stupid.

As for defense ... Curry led the league in steals. Is that a pure measure of good defense? Of course not. But to say "zero defense" is indisputably stupid.

Naw, the stupid one looks like you. Curry has gotten obliterated by him.

Perceptive analysis. You really made a compelling argument.

Human Torch wrote:

Shahs wrote:

I wouldn't count Curry and the Warriors out yet, especially with the nba and refs on there side. Didn't the Cavs come back on the Spurs when they were down 3-1 or was it 3-2?

What?? LOL. The Cavs and Spurs have meet in the Finals only once, in 2007, and the Cavs were swept in 4 one sided games.

I think he meant the Heat. And they were down 3-2.

Also a very accurate argument. You're really dumb

A perfect example of how people who know nothing about a sport shouldn't make statements on it.

Example, I know nothing about hockey. If I ever comment on it, it's always in the form of a question.

Human Torch wrote:

A perfect example of how people who know nothing about a sport shouldn't make statements on it.

Example, I know nothing about hockey. If I ever comment on it, it's always in the form of a question.

You should add basketball to that list, apparently. Point out where I'm wrong.

;) wrote:

Boost wrote:

Curry is not anywhere near the best players in the world. He's a one dimensional shooter. Westbrook has made him look like trash.

Curry will go down as another Steve Nash. A great shooter and offensive player with athletic limitations and zero defense.

You are an idiot. Curry is still one of the greatest players in the world. Yes, Westbrook has completely outplayed him. That does happen. When Westbrook is healthy and on, he is also one of the greatest.

As for looking like trash:

.42 FG, .86 FT, 5.5R, 4.5A, 2 steals, 23.5ppg

That is not trash. You are pretty stupid.

As for defense ... Curry led the league in steals. Is that a pure measure of good defense? Of course not. But to say "zero defense" is indisputably stupid.

Please do not EVER cite steals statistics to suggest that someone is a good (or bad) defender.

Kawhi Leonard (aka the BEST defender in the league) was 12th in steals this season. James Harden (aka the WORST defender in the league) was 13th. Enough said.

berryberry wrote:

"Curry is not anywhere near the best players in the world. He's a one dimensional shooter. "

You do, of course, realize that the point of the game is to score more than your opponents? So if you are going to be one dimensional, then scoring is a good place to be.

Of course, this is also an exaggeration. Curry is a fine passer, handles the ball great, and lead the league in steals. While he is not a great defender, he is far better than zero. . .

Please do not EVER cite steals statistics to suggest that someone is a good (or bad) defender.

Kawhi Leonard (aka the BEST defender in the league) was 12th in steals this season. James Harden (aka the WORST defender in the league) was 13th. Enough said.

This is the first series in two years that the Warriors actually played a semi-decent opponent. Last year was a fluke and they are getting exposed.

2015 Paper Champions.

;) wrote:

Human Torch wrote:

A perfect example of how people who know nothing about a sport shouldn't make statements on it.

Example, I know nothing about hockey. If I ever comment on it, it's always in the form of a question.

You should add basketball to that list, apparently. Point out where I'm wrong.

Where you're wrong is Curry has been obliterated by Westbrook in the last 4 games, idiot. LOL.

Serious, stop talking about hoops, you know zero about the game, you're making a fool of yourself, which I'm sure is a daily occurrence for you

Human Torch wrote:

;) wrote:

You should add basketball to that list, apparently. Point out where I'm wrong.

Where you're wrong is Curry has been obliterated by Westbrook in the last 4 games, idiot. LOL.

Serious, stop talking about hoops, you know zero about the game, you're making a fool of yourself, which I'm sure is a daily occurrence for you

So a guy shooting 41% and averaging over 23 points with 4.5A, 5.5R is not getting obliterated. He IS getting outplayed, which I have said all along.

Don't let your blinders obscure the truth from you. OKC is totally outclassing GSW so far (largely on DG's ineptitude up to now), but that doesn't mean Curry has been horrible. Sub-par, yes.

Again, provide a fact, not your opinion.

Steelie-eyed Dan wrote:

;) wrote:

You are an idiot. Curry is still one of the greatest players in the world. Yes, Westbrook has completely outplayed him. That does happen. When Westbrook is healthy and on, he is also one of the greatest.

As for looking like trash:

.42 FG, .86 FT, 5.5R, 4.5A, 2 steals, 23.5ppg

That is not trash. You are pretty stupid.

As for defense ... Curry led the league in steals. Is that a pure measure of good defense? Of course not. But to say "zero defense" is indisputably stupid.

Please do not EVER cite steals statistics to suggest that someone is a good (or bad) defender.

Kawhi Leonard (aka the BEST defender in the league) was 12th in steals this season. James Harden (aka the WORST defender in the league) was 13th. Enough said.

Read what I wrote. It's not a pure measure of good defense. But "zero defense," which is what he wrote, is stupid.

Here is a fact. Do you understand English or need picture cards to help you?

OKC HAS DEMOLISHED GSW AND HAS A 3-1 LEAD AND WESTBROOK HAS WRECKED CURRY.

Human Torch wrote:

Shahs wrote:

I wouldn't count Curry and the Warriors out yet, especially with the nba and refs on there side. Didn't the Cavs come back on the Spurs when they were down 3-1 or was it 3-2?

What?? LOL. The Cavs and Spurs have meet in the Finals only once, in 2007, and the Cavs were swept in 4 one sided games.

Ya, I meant the Heat as an example.

I know only 9 teams have come back from being down 3-1 but I wouldn't count out a defending championship team.

Warriors could gain momentum with a win at home.

Just how fast is Russell Westbrook? What do you all suppose he could run for 100m, 200m, and 400m?