Italian dopers revealed

The aggressive marathoners who finished 4th and 8th from Beijing WC marathon are included.

26 referrals for athletes:

Roberto Bertolini for violation of Article. 2.3. Of the CSA request for imposition of the sanction of disqualification of two years and not to proceed to the complaint essentially in art. 2.4 of the CSA;

Bourifa Migidio for violation of art. 2.3. Of the CSA request for imposition of the sanction of disqualification of two years not to proceed to the complaint essentially in art. 2.4 of the CSA;

CAMPIOLI Philip for violation of Article. 2.3. Of the CSA request for imposition of the sanction of disqualification of two years and not to proceed to the complaint essentially in art. 2.4 of the CSA;

Simone Collio for violation of Article. 2.3. CSA with the request for the imposition of the sanction of disqualification of two years and not to proceed to the complaint essentially in art. 2.4 of the CSA;

Roberto Donati for violation of Article. 2.3. Of the CSA request for imposition of the sanction of disqualification of two years and not to proceed to the complaint essentially in art. 2.4 of the CSA;

Fabrizio Donato for violation of Article. 2.3. Of the CSA request for imposition of the sanction of disqualification of two years and not to proceed to the complaint essentially in art. 2.4 of the CSA;

Faloci John for violation of Article. 2.3. Of the CSA request for imposition of the sanction of disqualification of two years and not to proceed to the complaint essentially in art. 2.4 of the CSA;

GALVAN Matteo for violation of Article. 2.3. Of the CSA request for imposition of the sanction of disqualification of two years and not to proceed to the complaint essentially in art. 2.4 of the CSA;

GIBILISCO Joseph for violation of Article. 2.3. Of the CSA request for imposition of the penalty of 2 years of inhibition and not to proceed to the complaint essentially in art. 2.4 of the CSA;

GREEK Daniele for violation of art. 2.3. Of the CSA request for imposition of the sanction of disqualification of two years and not to proceed to the complaint essentially in art. 2.4 of the CSA;

Andrew Howe for infringement of Article. 2.3. Of the CSA request for imposition of the sanction of disqualification of two years and not to proceed to the complaint essentially in art. 2.4 of the CSA;

UNCERTAIN Anna for violation of Article. 2.3. Of the CSA request for imposition of the sanction of disqualification of two years and not to proceed to the complaint essentially in art. 2.4 of the CSA;

LALLI Andrea for violation of Article. 2.3. Of the CSA request for imposition of the sanction of disqualification of two years and not to proceed to the complaint essentially in art. 2.4 of the CSA;

LA ROSA Stefano for violation of Article. 2.3. Of the CSA request for imposition of the sanction of disqualification of two years and not to proceed to the complaint essentially in art. 2.4 of the CSA;

LICCIARDELLO Claudio for violation of Article. 2.3. Of the CSA request for imposition of the sanction of disqualification of two years and not to proceed to the complaint essentially in art. 2.4 of the CSA;

Daniele Meucci of infringement of Article. 2.3. Of the CSA request for imposition of the sanction of disqualification of two years and not to proceed to the complaint essentially in art. 2.4 of the CSA;

OBRIST Christian for violation of Article. 2.3. Of the CSA request for imposition of the sanction of disqualification of two years and not to proceed to the complaint essentially in art. 2.4 of the CSA;

PERTILE Roger for violation of Article. 2.3. Of the CSA request for imposition of the sanction of disqualification of two years and not to proceed to the complaint essentially in art. 2.4 of the CSA;

Riparelli Jacques for violation of Article. 2.3. Of the CSA request for imposition of the sanction of disqualification of two years and not to proceed to the complaint essentially in art. 2.4 of the CSA;

SALIS Silvia for violation of Article. 2.3. Of the CSA request for imposition of the sanction of disqualification of two years and not to proceed to the complaint essentially in art. 2.4 of the CSA;

SCHEMBRI Fabrizio for violation of Article. 2.3. Of the CSA request for imposition of the sanction of disqualification of two years and not to proceed to the complaint essentially in art. 2.4 of the CSA;

SECCI Daniel for breach of Article. 2.3. Of the CSA request for imposition of the sanction of disqualification of two years and not to proceed to the complaint essentially in art. 2.4 of the CSA;

SLIMANI Kaddour for violation of Article. 2.3. Of the CSA request for imposition of the sanction of disqualification of two years and not to proceed to the complaint essentially in art. 2.4 of the CSA;

Tamberi Gianluca for violation of Article. 2.3. Of the CSA request for imposition of the sanction of disqualification of two years and not to proceed to the complaint essentially in art. 2.4 of the CSA;

Vistalli Mark Francis for violation of Article. 2.3. Of the CSA request for imposition of the sanction of disqualification of two years and not to proceed to the complaint essentially in art. 2.4 of the CSA;

Weissteiner Silvia for violation of Article. 2.3. Of the CSA request for imposition of the sanction of disqualification of two years and not to proceed to the complaint essentially in art. 2.4 of the CSA

39 REQUESTS FOR FILING for athletes:

BANI Zhara to the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

BENEDETTI Jordan to the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

BORDIGNON Laura for the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

Caimmi Daniel to the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

Fabio Cerutti for the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

CONSOLE Rosaria to the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

CRESPI Merihun for the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

Elisa Cusma Piccione for the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

Marco De Gasperi to the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

Marco De Luca to the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

DESCO Elisa for the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

OF CECCO Alberico for the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

DI GREGORIO Emanuele to the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

Antonietta Di Martino to the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

DUTIES Francesca for the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

FLORIANI Yuri for the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

FOGLIANI Ludovica to the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

Frullani William to the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

Anna Giordano Bruno to the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

GOTTARDO Leonardo for the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

Grenot Libania for the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

Lamera Raffaella for the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

THE MANTIA Simona for the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

Marco Lorenzi for the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

NASTI Patrick for the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

NKOULOUKIDI J.Jaques for the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

POVEGLIANO Lorenzo for the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

REINA Daniela for the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

Rifesser Lukas for the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

ROMAGNOLO Elena for the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

ROSA Chiara for the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

RUBY Giorgio to the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

SCARPELLINI Elena for the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

Alex Schwarzer for the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

STECCHI Claudio Michel to the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

Valeria Straneo for the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

TRICCA Michele for the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

TUMI Michael for the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA);

Matteo Villani for the allegations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the CSA).

What is going on here that dozens of athletes at once are sanctioned for the same issue of missing tests? Was there very little testing and then all of a sudden they started testing and the cheaters skipped out en masse? Was there coordination? Did they not get in touch with the athletes properly? Was a new test for a substance they were using announced? Something is off about this. We need some contextual explanation to understand why all of a sudden, out of nowhere dozens of athletes are sanctioned for the very same reason, and that is not a positive test.

Guessing some on the list have avoided testers and tried to hide. Also many on the list have also been reported to wada to be tested from peers. Some already have positive tests who are on both lists!

AND the tests are getting better, the cheats hear about one positive through the grapevine and fail to show.

jjjjjj wrote:

What is going on here that dozens of athletes at once are sanctioned for the same issue of missing tests? Was there very little testing and then all of a sudden they started testing and the cheaters skipped out en masse? Was there coordination? Did they not get in touch with the athletes properly? Was a new test for a substance they were using announced? Something is off about this. We need some contextual explanation to understand why all of a sudden, out of nowhere dozens of athletes are sanctioned for the very same reason, and that is not a positive test.

NOP athletes have missed several tests. They will not be banned because US doorbells don't always work.

Some of those are mistaken translations of names. Anna Incerti, not Uncertain, Ruggero Pertile, not Roger, etc. I believe the second list is of people whose files they have asked to dismissed, i.e. who did nothing and are not being charged.

Do you speak Italian? That list to me states that these athletes in second list are suspicious and are being investigated basically. Could be wrong

pikodegalo wrote:

Do you speak Italian? That list to me states that these athletes in second list are suspicious and are being investigated basically. Could be wrong

I copy/pasted Google Translate. The second list are athletes still under investigation.

Reuters reports NADO as calling for those 39 athletes' cases to be dropped:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/12/02/us-athletics-doping-italy-idUSKBN0TL2C320151202

There is an English language version of the site:

http://www.coni.it/en/news/primo-piano/10987-the-public-prosecutor-s-office-of-nado-italy-defers-26-athletes-and-asks-for-two-years-of-disqualification-dismissal-is-suggested-for-another-39-cases.html

Ivet Lalova's husband - Simone Collio - is on the list.

have to weigh in wrote:

Reuters reports NADO as calling for those 39 athletes' cases to be dropped:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/12/02/us-athletics-doping-italy-idUSKBN0TL2C320151202

This fact is why attributing the 26 who were banned to an administrative error is disingenuous. It was these 39 that were an error, and subsequently cleared, but the 26 are confirmed. More information about the case is needed, but for now, there is nothing to suggest that blaming CONI instead of the 26 athletes is warranted.

Didn't see stefano baldini's name on that list

Clerk wrote:

More information about the case is needed, but for now, there is nothing to suggest that blaming CONI instead of the 26 athletes is warranted.

Now reports say FIDAL is backing the athletes in saying it's an administrative error: