*Breaking* John Boehner to resign next month

ok gary, 90 seconds of googling found you saying this:

The killing of an ambassador is always serious. It's a scandal because:

1. Stevens requested more security, but didn't get it.

2. Stevens was being attacked for hours, and support was within striking distance, but the Hillary/Obama team gave the order to stand down.

3. Hillary and Obama new within the first few hours that it was a coordinated terrorist attack.

4. They immediately blamed it on some guy who made a video, and swore they'd go get that guy.

5. That guy was sent to jail on some trumped up unrelated charge, and no one in the media ever asked why?

6. When pressed about her lying to Americans about the cause of the attack Hillary responded with "What difference at this point does it make!'.

When Hillary first ran for President one of her campaign slogans was to ask the question who we want answering the phone at 3 am at the White House when there are so many dangers in the world.

Well Hillary got the call... and refused to help Americans under attack, let Americans die, lied about it to America and to the faces of the victims' relatives, blamed it on a video, threw an innocent man in jail, then said none of it mattered.

This isn't just about "lying", it's about pure concentrated evil in the person of Hillary Clinton. She is wholly corrupt to the core.

The Banghazi scandal should disqualify Hillary from the post of dog catcher, much less President of the US.

Read more:

http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=6512164#ixzz3mlfdLC1R

stating a bunch of falsehoods and half truths mixed in with some unprovable assertions and then calling the secretary of state "pure concentrated evil" and "wholly corrupt" is exactly the kind of extreme behavior that I am talking about.

you want to comment, gary? I'm hoping we don't have to rehash Benghazi, but keep in mind that multiple republican commissions have found nothing like what you claim here. You just yell and scream and call names. Nice.

Can someone Explain why republicans are so against planned parenthood and availability of contraceptives?

Is being anti-contraception an elaborate ruse by republican males because guys don't like wearing condoms and enjoy the risk?

Good riddance

The jar is round wrote:

Can someone Explain why republicans are so against planned parenthood and availability of contraceptives?

Is being anti-contraception an elaborate ruse by republican males because guys don't like wearing condoms and enjoy the risk?

as you know, the fight is about abortion, not birth control

WWRD wrote:

Comical that the lefties paint anyone on the right that's celebrating Boehner resigning is a wack job. He's been a feckless, worthless, spineless leader who's lost virtually every battle with the dems....no wonder you all love him so much...he's a loser!

I'm very sad, the BOehNER was my BFF.

agip wrote:

The jar is round wrote:

Can someone Explain why republicans are so against planned parenthood and availability of contraceptives?

Is being anti-contraception an elaborate ruse by republican males because guys don't like wearing condoms and enjoy the risk?

as you know, the fight is about abortion, not birth control

The majority of Americans are pro-lifers.

Boehner made his decision after meeting with the Pope. He was balling like a baby. My guess is the Pope wants him to run for President. If he does jump in, he'll immediately become the favorite to win the GOP nomination. I'm predicting a Biden-Boehner match next November.

agip wrote:

The jar is round wrote:

Can someone Explain why republicans are so against planned parenthood and availability of contraceptives?

Is being anti-contraception an elaborate ruse by republican males because guys don't like wearing condoms and enjoy the risk?

as you know, the fight is about abortion, not birth control

Wrong. The fight is about pandering for votes. Both side do it, constantly. No member of either party has a moral compass of any sort.

Polster wrote:

agip wrote:

as you know, the fight is about abortion, not birth control

The majority of Americans are pro-lifers.

The majority of Americans are not runners, and are fat. Therefore, all runners who quit immediately and eat more junk food. Okay.

all runners *should* quit immediately

WWRD wrote:

Comical that the lefties paint anyone on the right that's celebrating Boehner resigning is a wack job. He's been a feckless, worthless, spineless leader who's lost virtually every battle with the dems....no wonder you all love him so much...he's a loser!

So your respected Republican Congressmen put into power a "feckless, worthless, spineless leader."

If they can't even make a simple decision about choosing their leader, how can we trust them on more important issues?

Polster wrote:

agip wrote:

as you know, the fight is about abortion, not birth control

The majority of Americans are pro-lifers.

false - the majority are pro choice. Only 19% think abortion should be illegal under all circumstances.

to be fair, it does depend how you form the question.

This election cycle is going to be unbelievably ugly. Damn.

I feel sorry for Boehner to some extent, but I'd still vote for a 2nd-tier GOPer before I'd vote for Clinton for POTUS. I just plain don't trust her.

We need term limits in America.

Voter In 2016 wrote:

This election cycle is going to be unbelievably ugly. Damn.

I feel sorry for Boehner to some extent, but I'd still vote for a 2nd-tier GOPer before I'd vote for Clinton for POTUS. I just plain don't trust her.

We need term limits in America.

term limits would just make stafffers the real power powerbrokers.

and congress has a fairly high turnover already: Nearly two in five lawmakers in the U.S. House, 39%, have served for less than three years, according to data compiled by the non-partisan Cook Political Report. It's the least experienced House since at least 1995, when an election wave swept the Republicans into power.

Let me help you out, pretty sure you meant "...everyone who agrees with us to be treated equally." I know you were typing fast and just forgot, so no need to thank me. How many botched abortions annually by the way and seems abortion is the only thing you have against liberals? Not too bad, so all the other stuff is ok with you? That is good to know.

JB should take swim classes at the YMCA, do crossfit, then join the US Navy SEALS again. He did after high school but failed. He should be able to make it this time.

spade detector wrote:

The crazies are certainly celebrating.

DiscoGary wrote:

The fact that Liberals are lamenting this is all you need to know about which side this guy was really on. (Hint: Neither the Democrat side nor the Republican side. He was on the side of the Ruling Class.)

Let's get him and McConnell out and return to a two party system.

Perfect, haha

"I'd still vote for a 2nd-tier GOPer"

I can see not voting because you can't stand any of them but please tell me which 2nd-tier GOPer that you trust.

I'm guessing you mean: former Florida governor Jeb Bush at 10% support, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio at 9% and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz at 7%.

So you can trust, Jeb to support nearly all of Ws positions and really cut taxes for the rich. You can trust Ted to shut the government down all often as possible over less and less. You can trust Marco to not believe in climate change, to waste time trying to repeal Romneycare and to oppose ALL abortions.

Good riddance!!! Now get McConnell out of there too