Where is the "proof" Cram and Coe used drugs? Really, I don't think I have ever seen proof.
Where is the "proof" Cram and Coe used drugs? Really, I don't think I have ever seen proof.
Wow, why! wrote:
That comment really sums up the worst of this forum. Deep down you don't really believe that.
Oh yes I sure do and am 100 percent convinced it is true.
Look at their passionate, hypocritical, psychotic beliefs in the drugs.
There is no doubt they've been using drugs from an early age, which is why they're so into them, and afraid of the cover being blown from their drug laden cart.
another out of the loop guy wrote:
Where is the "proof" Cram and Coe used drugs? Really, I don't think I have ever seen proof.
You can tell when they open their mouths.
When will those hypocrites roast Paula?
Bassackwards wrote:
You can always tell a drug cheat fox, because they're blaming other people's butts for the farts.
It's entirely appropriate that someone with a butt fixation would be smoking crack. Your posts don't make any sense.
bbc = the real pigs wrote:
When will those hypocrites roast Paula?
When she has served two suspensions like Gatlin? Do you realize that the BBC is respected world-wide? It is second to none.
That would help their case against Gatlin, to be sure. Don't "roast", but ask the hard questions.
bbc = the real pigs wrote:
When will those hypocrites roast Paula?
Neutral Observertard wrote:
bbc = the real pigs wrote:When will those hypocrites roast Paula?
When she has served two suspensions like Gatlin? Do you realize that the BBC is respected world-wide? It is second to none.
HAHAHAHAHA!
Please change your handle to Leftist Tard.
The interesting thing about Paula is that a lot of her other data is out there in medical journals. I think she's clean in the "razor thin bleeding edge" sort of way. Her taking corticosteriods "days" before the Olympics even though it's allowed out of competition (due to the accident) is a little sketchy. So is the Healing Hans stuff, but like I said - bleeding edge.
My opinion:
1) Michael Johnson is probably the biggest piece of s$#% out there.The single biggest hypocrite in the world of athletics - always on BBC talking about how athletes don't train hard enough, drug cheats are scum blah blah blah. It's one thing to have f$#ked the system and gotten away with it - it's another to continue to profit off it and sit back with that smug smile of his. You were clean MJ - right, were you f$#k
2) I have always liked Cram - as an athlete and as a commentator. This is changing (the latter). His pre-prepared "emotional" blather immediately after the final about "saving titles and saving the sport" is so completely manufactured it defies belief. If Cram can sit there with a straight face and say he believes Bolt is any less dirty than Gatlin I would be shocked. Was he put up to it and sold out? No idea. Whatever that was it was pure garbage.
bbc = the real pigs wrote:
Neutral Observertard wrote:When she has served two suspensions like Gatlin? Do you realize that the BBC is respected world-wide? It is second to none.
HAHAHAHAHA!
Please change your handle to Leftist Tard.
Humor me. Which news outlet is more respected worldwide than BBC?
I was thinking: "If I was Steve, I would not want to sidle up to close to Johnson The Hypocrite on this, and cracked up when the video has Cram totally remote....
Agree with the critique of BS "Saving our sport!" commentary.
you people accusing johnson and cram of being dopers need to get a grip. You really have to make a distinction between people who tested positive and people who didn't. Otherwise you are on a witch hunt.
that said, Cram didn't really address the issue - that journalists need to be a somewhat impartial. Not perfectly, but rooting against people is not right.
and johnson - he spoke for 5 minutes and had about zero content. he needs to get his thoughts together. He's all form and zero content.
Has any Geordie ever been busted for doping?
agip wrote:
you people accusing johnson and cram of being dopers need to get a grip. You really have to make a distinction between people who tested positive and people who didn't. Otherwise you are on a witch hunt.
that said, Cram didn't really address the issue - that journalists need to be a somewhat impartial. Not perfectly, but rooting against people is not right.
and johnson - he spoke for 5 minutes and had about zero content. he needs to get his thoughts together. He's all form and zero content.
Most of the people on here have zero insight into the sport. It makes them feel better to cast insults and accusations.
MJ is one of the most ungracious and arrogant people I have ever met, but I'm still not going to accuse him of doping without any proof.