Alta, Park City, Snowbird >>> Golden Gate Bridge
Alta, Park City, Snowbird >>> Golden Gate Bridge
Has anyone ever rocked a stache better than John Stossel?!
I'll take my midwestern rust-belt suburb where cost of living is cheap and the commute is 6 miles.
Why people commute any longer than this just completely blows my mind.
What exactly does someone do for work in SLC? Sell SEO services, push security systems door to door, or launch the latest juice craze pyramid scheme? If your single and in your 20s who do you date? Divorcees and single moms?
"Stossel is a butt weasel"
look it up!
I'll take SLC thanks wrote:
I cannot imagine why anyone says anything positive about this place?
For one, great coffee. But someone from SLC is unlikely to understand this.
This is not a new phenomena in San Francisco. Ever hear of the sixties or the Barbary Coast? Now in addition to dirty hippies, they are getting an influx of immigrants (again, nothing new here) since they are a sanctuary city. But hey, if that is what the voting public wants, then let them determine their own fate. You don't have to live or visit there. I'm out there for work a couple times a year and have never had much of an issue. Of greater concern to me is the proliferation of motorcycles driving between lanes.
Detriot with an Arch wrote:
Sound just like Saint Louis, Missouri aka, Detroit with an Arch (without the high rents, etc).
I think you mean East St Louis. Big difference.
Dril wrote:
What exactly does someone do for work in SLC? Sell SEO services, push security systems door to door, or launch the latest juice craze pyramid scheme? If your single and in your 20s who do you date? Divorcees and single moms?
1) regular jobs like any other city
2) you go to Park City to find non-mormons
*and then you rage on the miles upon miles of trails and dirt roads
Neutral Observertard wrote:
.....,.... wrote:
Cool story bro. All those people paying $4k+ a month to live there must hate it or be totally brainwashed.
But SLC is better suited to poor people from third tier state Us anyway. Plus the airport security lines are shorter. Enjoy.
By the way, I'm suggesting you are poor and stupid, if that got over your head.
I expect what you said went over most heads. It hardly made any sense.
Agreed. That hurt my brain to even read.
Kirkwood 1 wrote:
Detriot with an Arch wrote:
Sound just like Saint Louis, Missouri aka, Detroit with an Arch (without the high rents, etc).
I think you mean East St Louis. Big difference.
Not really. St Louis is incredibly dangerous, ghetto and has one of the highest murder rates of any city in the country.
I’m from SLC originally and went to college in SF. I recently turned down a job offer in the Bay Area because what was cool to a college kid is just seedy to a 40+ year old. As far as I’m concerned, spending a weekend there now and then is nice, but you — literally— couldn’t pay me to live there now.
kikKomen Soi sauce wrote:
Most liberal-infested places are trash.
Liberals can't create or maintain thriving societies or sparkling infrastructure. All they care about is feelings and "rights." They have no discipline, no dedication to a higher cause. They wallow in narcissism and entitlement. They destroy their minds with poisonous ideology and their bodies with a lack of exercise and drugs. Worst of all, they spread the liberal disease to others and pass it on to the next generations.
There is a reason why conservatives live in the country, while liberals live in the city. Liberals wallow in and perpetuate the human-created toxic urban environment. Meanwhile, the natural environment in the countryside keeps conservatives mentally pure, allowing conservatives to build a pure society. A quick comparison of urban and rural environments reveals the obvious illness of the liberal urban areas and the obvious health and purity of the conservative rural areas.
I'm only half trolling with this.
Love it! Most accurate thing I've read on lets run in months!!!
I like the irony of lazily labeling a whole sect of society as "undisciplined". It makes me laugh.
kikKomen Soi sauce wrote:
Most liberal-infested places are trash.
Liberals can't create or maintain thriving societies or sparkling infrastructure. All they care about is feelings and "rights." They have no discipline, no dedication to a higher cause. They wallow in narcissism and entitlement. They destroy their minds with poisonous ideology and their bodies with a lack of exercise and drugs. Worst of all, they spread the liberal disease to others and pass it on to the next generations.
There is a reason why conservatives live in the country, while liberals live in the city. Liberals wallow in and perpetuate the human-created toxic urban environment. Meanwhile, the natural environment in the countryside keeps conservatives mentally pure, allowing conservatives to build a pure society. A quick comparison of urban and rural environments reveals the obvious illness of the liberal urban areas and the obvious health and purity of the conservative rural areas.
I'm only half trolling with this.
I guess that explains why people living in rural states like West Virginia and Kentucky are killing themselves with opioids, have higher rates of obesity and shorter life expectancy.
https://www.drugabuse.gov/drugs-abuse/opioids/opioid-summaries-by-statepior wrote:
kikKomen Soi sauce wrote:
Most liberal-infested places are trash.
Liberals can't create or maintain thriving societies or sparkling infrastructure. All they care about is feelings and "rights." They have no discipline, no dedication to a higher cause. They wallow in narcissism and entitlement. They destroy their minds with poisonous ideology and their bodies with a lack of exercise and drugs. Worst of all, they spread the liberal disease to others and pass it on to the next generations.
There is a reason why conservatives live in the country, while liberals live in the city. Liberals wallow in and perpetuate the human-created toxic urban environment. Meanwhile, the natural environment in the countryside keeps conservatives mentally pure, allowing conservatives to build a pure society. A quick comparison of urban and rural environments reveals the obvious illness of the liberal urban areas and the obvious health and purity of the conservative rural areas.
I'm only half trolling with this.
I guess that explains why people living in rural states like West Virginia and Kentucky are killing themselves with opioids, have higher rates of obesity and shorter life expectancy.
https://www.drugabuse.gov/drugs-abuse/opioids/opioid-summaries-by-state
It is much better to be obese than homeless. Homelessness is ILLEGAL, and SF cops need to start enforcing this law if they want to make any progress.
Legality is far more important than morality.
Americans you dont need to argue who of you is worse. There is enough space in hell for all of you
Per capita income in SF is $50k and household income is $96k, while the unholy housing costs are a very large part of the homeless problem. Parking is an issue only in the downtown, but you can live elsewhere and take public transportation or ride your bike to SF. The culture means that your own personal space doesn't need to be much because there is so much to do that you cannot do anywhere else. The food is tremendous and you can get good food cheap if you take out and buy drinks separately.
Nice weather also plays a role. Better to be homeless in a non-freezing weather place like SF than in NYC or other cold cities.
Colin Sahlman runs 1:45 and Nico Young runs 1:47 in the 800m tonight at the Desert Heat Classic
Molly Seidel Fails To Debut As An Ultra Runner After Running A Road Marathon The Week Before
Megan Keith (14:43) DESTROYS Parker Valby's 5000 PB in Shanghai
Hallowed sub-16 barrier finally falls - 3 teams led by Villanova's 15:51.91 do it at Penn Relays!!!
Need female opinions: I’m dating a woman that is very sexual with me in public. Any tips/insight?