If Alberto's statement hasn't convinced you of his innocence, you are either stupid or being willfully obtuse.

ijenns318 wrote:

I actually agree with this. It seems pretty obvious that the people who are trying to rip on Salazar in this thread didn't read the statement at all.

4/10 I like the misdirect and false choices.

Or, they read the whole statement carefully and identified numerous factual problems with ALL the evidence in the world and multiple exhibits.

ijenns318 wrote: I can't wait to see the smart ass LRC trolls who think they know everything about USADA and NOP try and prove me wrong..

IAAF's rules permit doping and Al Sal used them to full effect. You get to be right and Nike is running a doping program at the same time.

Good job.

Teller of obvious truths wrote:

Another unregistered name. = Another PR firm worker drone.

Nobody care about Lets Run. The 'owners' are room temperature IQ individuals, and the level of discussion here is roughly equivalent to Beavis and/or Butthead conversation.

Oh, did you figure out I was A Duck? :-) Gotcha, didn't I.

Teller of obvious truths wrote:

That is all. Magness and the Gouchers have clearly made false statements and the ball is now in their court.

Aw, bless. I know you probably felt all, you know, GROWN UP when you used the 'obtuse' word. However, the next time you get the urge to do so, just double check to make sure you didn't mean abstruse. I know - you've never heard of abstruse. Most people who incorrectly say obtuse haven't either. Don't feel too bad.

Really? Biased is having an opinion now. Opinion is bias. Glad there's evidence to support the "bias" though. Nothing in Alberto's report serves to eradicate the evidence compiled against NOP. All the report gives us is sheer denial, which is something he/NOP/Nike could have released in less than 24 hours of the ProPublica report going public.

I don't like that Rupp is being compared to Armstrong (always a fan of Rupp--no matter if hes on PEDS--and never a fan of Armstrong) but given Salazar's history and Nike's connections its not like the ProPublica report was all that surprising.

ijenns318 wrote:

Salazar has literally ALL of the evidence in the world, along with multiple exhibits.

He has said nothing of substance about sabotaging standardized medical tests for asthma.

His explanation for testing Androgel on his son is laughable.

He has provided no justification for suggesting healthy athletes ignore doctors' orders and take each others' prescriptions. (Because this can't be justified.)

Nice post, "ijenns318." Amazing how many new handles are suddenly on the board! Is there another handle you usually use, or have you just started posting on Letsrun this week?

Actually, no, obtuse is the word. Not abstruse.Now you're both wrong. Just for different reasons.

letsrun vocabulary helper wrote:

Teller of obvious truths wrote:

That is all. Magness and the Gouchers have clearly made false statements and the ball is now in their court.

Aw, bless. I know you probably felt all, you know, GROWN UP when you used the 'obtuse' word. However, the next time you get the urge to do so, just double check to make sure you didn't mean abstruse. I know - you've never heard of abstruse. Most people who incorrectly say obtuse haven't either. Don't feel too bad.