It's not a natural phenomenon, so it would be cool to try to figure out who or what created it.
It's not a natural phenomenon, so it would be cool to try to figure out who or what created it.
An orbiting satellite got a better picture proving it was nothing
They have. Well, they've gotten better photos of it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cydonia_%28region_of_Mars%29
...and discovered it wasn't really a face.
maxpower wrote:
They have. Well, they've gotten better photos of it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cydonia_%28region_of_Mars%29...and discovered it wasn't really a face.
You can't believe the deliberately-disseminated disinformation put out by those that wish to cover up the truth.
First of all, the original architects may have intended for the face to only appear under very specific circumstances (such as ancient astrological stone structures which indicated growing/harvesting seasons here on earth). Secondly, the original picture was from 20 years ago. Why would anyone expect this to remain unchanged on Mars' hostile environment?!
Marvel wrote:
maxpower wrote:They have. Well, they've gotten better photos of it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cydonia_%28region_of_Mars%29...and discovered it wasn't really a face.
You can't believe the deliberately-disseminated disinformation put out by those that wish to cover up the truth.
So why would you believe the results returned by the rover?