Did Mike Rossi (viral marathon dad) cheat his way into Boston?

SaraB wrote:

LoserMikeRossi wrote:

It should be noted that a couple other suspicious runners have been looked at and none has had their names splattered across this forum until Sarah B mentioned a name.

We looked at a guy with no bib, one with a crumpled bib. With some investigating we cleared both of them as not likely accomplices. The latest person, whom Sarah loves to mention now, just threw up a red flag and we were looking to prove or disprove any involvement.

You mean the other guy you accused of running for Rossi. The one who you posted loads and loads of different photos of that you stole from his facebook and were obsessed with even though we told you they looked nothing alike? We gave you loads of evidence to disprove your current theory, not the least that the two bibs started two seconds apart. We disproved it a large number of times but you ignored the evidence and carried on with your accusations, even trying to find Rossi's medical information. I stood up to you for the very reason that you were accusing this innocent man of things where there was no facts to support it. Declaring that someone is guilty without evidence in a secret facebook group is just as bad as doing it to their face. Actually it's worse because the poor guy can't even defend himself. You also asked anyone who spoke to him to record what he said. I'd love to see screenshots of that bit.

LoserMikeRossi wrote:

SaraB wrote:

You mean the other guy you accused of running for Rossi. The one who you posted loads and loads of different photos of that you stole from his facebook and were obsessed with even though we told you they looked nothing alike? We gave you loads of evidence to disprove your current theory, not the least that the two bibs started two seconds apart. We disproved it a large number of times but you ignored the evidence and carried on with your accusations, even trying to find Rossi's medical information. I stood up to you for the very reason that you were accusing this innocent man of things where there was no facts to support it. Declaring that someone is guilty without evidence in a secret facebook group is just as bad as doing it to their face. Actually it's worse because the poor guy can't even defend himself. You also asked anyone who spoke to him to record what he said. I'd love to see screenshots of that bit.

Well Sarah has now slandered the name of an American War hero that we were all hoping would NOT have to be mentioned, even if there was a level of involvement. Sarah doesn't care.

And truth be told he was mentioned WAY back further in this thread as a potential witness to something. Just because I looked at him from a different perspective doesn't mean I publicly accused him of anything.

But Sarah is now openly explaining what my thought process was and dragging what could be an innocent bystander into this.

Some of us were actually trying find the truth, while Sarah simply collected a bunch of screen shots from Mike's social media and put it together on a spreadsheet and called it "evidence", and then wrote her opinion on a blog.

LoserMikeRossi wrote:

SaraB wrote:

You mean the other guy you accused of running for Rossi. The one who you posted loads and loads of different photos of that you stole from his facebook and were obsessed with even though we told you they looked nothing alike? We gave you loads of evidence to disprove your current theory, not the least that the two bibs started two seconds apart. We disproved it a large number of times but you ignored the evidence and carried on with your accusations, even trying to find Rossi's medical information. I stood up to you for the very reason that you were accusing this innocent man of things where there was no facts to support it. Declaring that someone is guilty without evidence in a secret facebook group is just as bad as doing it to their face. Actually it's worse because the poor guy can't even defend himself. You also asked anyone who spoke to him to record what he said. I'd love to see screenshots of that bit.

Well Sarah has now slandered the name of an American War hero that we were all hoping would NOT have to be mentioned, even if there was a level of involvement. Sarah doesn't care.

And truth be told he was mentioned WAY back further in this thread as a potential witness to something. Just because I looked at him from a different perspective doesn't mean I publicly accused him of anything.

But Sarah is now openly explaining what my thought process was and dragging what could be an innocent bystander into this.

Some of us were actually trying find the truth, while Sarah simply collected a bunch of screen shots from Mike's social media and put it together on a spreadsheet and called it "evidence", and then wrote her opinion on a blog.

SaraB wrote:

LoserMikeRossi wrote:

Well Sarah has now slandered the name of an American War hero that we were all hoping would NOT have to be mentioned, even if there was a level of involvement. Sarah doesn't care.

And truth be told he was mentioned WAY back further in this thread as a potential witness to something. Just because I looked at him from a different perspective doesn't mean I publicly accused him of anything.

But Sarah is now openly explaining what my thought process was and dragging what could be an innocent bystander into this.

Some of us were actually trying find the truth, while Sarah simply collected a bunch of screen shots from Mike's social media and put it together on a spreadsheet and called it "evidence", and then wrote her opinion on a blog.

Seriously? You do not want to start with me Ken because I'll win. Letting the poor guy know that you are obsessed with him is in slander in any way. I have witnesses who saw you post exactly the same as what I saw. How the hell can me telling you that Rendall is innocent (I was about to give you photo evidence that he is innocent but you kicked me out because I said I was going to screenprint any more slander) and to leave him alone be slander in anyway? You stating that Rendall is a cheat that helped Rossi and asking for medical evidence and to record him on the other hand is clearly dodgy. Stop trying to detract attention away from your actions

SaraB wrote:

LoserMikeRossi wrote:

Well Sarah has now slandered the name of an American War hero that we were all hoping would NOT have to be mentioned, even if there was a level of involvement. Sarah doesn't care.

And truth be told he was mentioned WAY back further in this thread as a potential witness to something. Just because I looked at him from a different perspective doesn't mean I publicly accused him of anything.

But Sarah is now openly explaining what my thought process was and dragging what could be an innocent bystander into this.

Some of us were actually trying find the truth, while Sarah simply collected a bunch of screen shots from Mike's social media and put it together on a spreadsheet and called it "evidence", and then wrote her opinion on a blog.

Seriously? You do not want to start with me Ken because I'll win. Letting the poor guy know that you are obsessed with him is in slander in any way. I have witnesses who saw you post exactly the same as what I saw. How the hell can me telling you that Rendall is innocent (I was about to give you photo evidence that he is innocent but you kicked me out because I said I was going to screenprint any more slander) and to leave him alone be slander in anyway? You stating that Rendall is a cheat that helped Rossi and asking for medical evidence and to record him on the other hand is clearly dodgy. Stop trying to detract attention away from your actions

LoserMikeRossi wrote:

i guess even at this point I have to concede that Mike Rossi outsmarted everyone. Some people still want to look into eye witnesses, so there will be some work behind the scenes. But not by me.

But I don't want Sarah mentioning somebody's name in public and if it means Rossi got away with cheating in order for her to stop and hopefully not embarrass an American hero than that is what should happen.

It's bad enough that Mike cheated and then used that lie to cyberbully the school principal. But I have too much respect for our armed forces to allow this soldier to be slung through the mud.

If he does, and happens to come across this, know that I am sorry I trusted somebody in a private Facebook group to be discreet and that person turned out to not be trustworthy.

I, for one, thank you for your service to our nation. My nephew just graduated form Parris Island and is now stationed at Camp Lejeune, so I can appreciate the sacrifice you make for your family and your nation.

LoserMikeRossi wrote:

i guess even at this point I have to concede that Mike Rossi outsmarted everyone. Some people still want to look into eye witnesses, so there will be some work behind the scenes. But not by me.

But I don't want Sarah mentioning somebody's name in public and if it means Rossi got away with cheating in order for her to stop and hopefully not embarrass an American hero than that is what should happen.

It's bad enough that Mike cheated and then used that lie to cyberbully the school principal. But I have too much respect for our armed forces to allow this soldier to be slung through the mud.

If he does, and happens to come across this, know that I am sorry I trusted somebody in a private Facebook group to be discreet and that person turned out to not be trustworthy.

I, for one, thank you for your service to our nation. My nephew just graduated form Parris Island and is now stationed at Camp Lejeune, so I can appreciate the sacrifice you make for your family and your nation.

Doubler wrote:

LoserMikeRossi wrote:

i guess even at this point I have to concede that Mike Rossi outsmarted everyone. Some people still want to look into eye witnesses, so there will be some work behind the scenes. But not by me.

But I don't want Sarah mentioning somebody's name in public and if it means Rossi got away with cheating in order for her to stop and hopefully not embarrass an American hero than that is what should happen.

It's bad enough that Mike cheated and then used that lie to cyberbully the school principal. But I have too much respect for our armed forces to allow this soldier to be slung through the mud.

If he does, and happens to come across this, know that I am sorry I trusted somebody in a private Facebook group to be discreet and that person turned out to not be trustworthy.

I, for one, thank you for your service to our nation. My nephew just graduated form Parris Island and is now stationed at Camp Lejeune, so I can appreciate the sacrifice you make for your family and your nation.

Yes, you just wanted to go behind his back and have someone contact him, record the conversation, and share the results of that conversation with a group on Facebook. NO ONE here is buying your load of crap. And I don't think anyone on Facebook is buying it either. I don't recall a single person backing up your accomplice theory or even bothering to comment on your posts asking for all kinds of personal information.

LoserMikeRossi wrote:

i guess even at this point I have to concede that Mike Rossi outsmarted everyone. Some people still want to look into eye witnesses, so there will be some work behind the scenes. But not by me.

But I don't want Sarah mentioning somebody's name in public and if it means Rossi got away with cheating in order for her to stop and hopefully not embarrass an American hero than that is what should happen.

It's bad enough that Mike cheated and then used that lie to cyberbully the school principal. But I have too much respect for our armed forces to allow this soldier to be slung through the mud.

If he does, and happens to come across this, know that I am sorry I trusted somebody in a private Facebook group to be discreet and that person turned out to not be trustworthy.

I, for one, thank you for your service to our nation. My nephew just graduated form Parris Island and is now stationed at Camp Lejeune, so I can appreciate the sacrifice you make for your family and your nation.