Ole Classic - Gray 1'42.80 Solo from '92 Trials

Holy Crap... how can this be so important to anyone.

You're posts are deluded nonsense.

Lagat never did break 1:46 for 800m. That is a fact. To suggest this is a 'stoopid' statement just makes you look ignorant.

I never said he wasn't 'capable of breaking 1:46' but it's a fact he never managed it in a race. To suggest someone who never won an 800 of any importance and never broke 1:46 was capable of 1:41.5, is laughable.

You suggest someone who never broke 1:46 was capable of 1:41.5, yet the world record holder at the event for 18 years was actually slower than he officially ran and only really a 1:42 flat runner. What a crock of s**t.

No expert of the sport would suggest Lagat was better than Coe over 800 by 0.5 sec apart from you. It just makes you look utterly biased and not very bright.

ventolin^3 wrote:

coe got into inner-1 within ~ 2 or 3s of 1k wrs

noah never got into inner-1 in whole bend

at best he got into outer-1 by 12s

And so what? If Coe gets faster into lane 1 than required while running on the tangent, this just would mean that he has run some extra distance (also obviously not much). It definitely seems that Coe in his 2:13.40 has run more extra distance in the first curve (mainly because of running wide at the end) than Ngeny in his 2:11.96.

The level of your posts regarding this subject in this thread and the Centrowitz/Sowinski one almost is beyond any comparison (OK, there are some others from you who are very close, for example regarding Stuttgart '86)

Just a reminder for you what an evolvente is:

more nonsense

more nonsense

you incapable of thinking he had significant worse speed than noah ?

only a derelict coud think this

worst nonsense ever posted is :

"1'46"

how inept are you to not know noah split 1'44.6 off suicidal 49.8 off 6+m extra in 1st 200 off 3'29.1 from 44 hours before ?

then post non-drivel

clueless

he ran 1'46+ in last 800 in athens

only to someone with paucity of neurone

impress me

what coud noah have run in rieti for 800 in fully rested run ???

eh ?

what part of noah in 1'44.6 of ridiculous 49.8+ with ~ 6m extra in 1st 200, with 44 hours rest from a 3'29.1 win you not comprehend ?

a mickey mouse time

cruz ran 0.04s outside with a timing that was immediate

only an inept brings up a mickey-mouse time that took best part of an hour to officiate

nonsense meet/time

mickey-mouse meet/track

where are all the other vids such as 13'04 in '84 ?

8 more chances in '81

he coudn't crack 1'45

pathetic back-up

nonsense

see above

utterly clueless

no one wouda expected a kid in nijel to match coe's ole time after rounds on a "proper" track & "proper" timing & after rounds

all you have posted is utter nonsense

utterly clueless

that is shortest point & most direct line to run 1k

he doesn't

he jockeys for position & pushed about but is in lane 1 within 2 - 3s

above

nonsense

coe's vid has much better picture

get a brain :

coe ran 2'13.4

noah ran 2'11.9

shave off time coe's 2'13.4 to limit

what is this nonsense ?

i am familiar with involutes

offer it

Deano wrote:

You're posts are deluded nonsense.

Lagat never did break 1:46 for 800m. That is a fact. To suggest this is a 'stoopid' statement just makes you look ignorant.

I never said he wasn't 'capable of breaking 1:46' but it's a fact he never managed it in a race. To suggest someone who never won an 800 of any importance and never broke 1:46 was capable of 1:41.5, is laughable.

You suggest someone who never broke 1:46 was capable of 1:41.5, yet the world record holder at the event for 18 years was actually slower than he officially ran and only really a 1:42 flat runner. What a crock of s**t.

No expert of the sport would suggest Lagat was better than Coe over 800 by 0.5 sec apart from you. It just makes you look utterly biased and not very bright.

Exactly

ventolin^3 wrote:

what is this nonsense ?

i am familiar with involutes

offer it

Definitely - but still havn't understood what's the meaning of them at all.