Less is more.
Less is more.
xenonscreams wrote:
1. They're comfortable
2. They make you feel fast
simple
Why are you sporting parachute split shorts and tri shorts in your pics on here then?
youra confused virgin wrote:
It's just some of the runner chicks he screwed last year.
Now show us the pics of what you put your D into during 2014. Oh well, please don't.
If that were actually the case, I would tip my cap. They are more than cute enough for those purposes. They just are not the choices I would use as sexy examples (especially when I have the whole web as a resource...).
Also - I am married. That means that I didn't put my "D" in anything last year. Please refer to the post-nuptial shutoff thread.
thigh chafe wrote:
xenonscreams wrote:1. They're comfortable
2. They make you feel fast
simple
Why are you sporting parachute split shorts and tri shorts in your pics on here then?
Because Brooks doesn't make spankies and my Club is Brooks sponsored. They make a pair of boy shorts but they're not good. I ended up getting a pair of blue bunhuggers for last season and using nailpolish remover to take the logo off. It doesn't look good when Brooks supports us and we're sporting other logos.
Shorts-to-skin chafes more than skin-to-skin. Those ugly half-tights are really good for no chafing though. But they make me feel gross, not fast. So I wear spankies, because they're comfortable, don't chafe, and make me feel fast.
I'll take this look:
http://www.letsrun.com/photos/2011/daegu/day6md/images/Uceny_Morgan-World11.JPG
over this look:
http://wac.450f.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/katsfm.com/files/2012/08/MORGAN-UCENY-7.jpg
any day of the week. Spanks are f'n ugly.
PS - I'm sure all these women are so interested in getting their 'look' just right for me.
She had to poop really bad at the end of the race.
Not true. You run better when you believe in yourself. This is why some women wear makeup to races. It's not about looking pretty, it's about feeling confident, and for some women makeup does that. For Maggie Vessey it's all of those homemade outfits. For almost everyone ever, it's changing into their racing flats or spikes, because let's be honest, they don't actually make you that much faster. But the ritual of putting them on tells you "it's time to run fast" and so you do. You can't run slow in spankies and spikes. It just doesn't feel right.
In any case, in general, the less clothing you have on you when you run (provided it's warm enough), the more comfortable, and I'm pretty sure if spankies looked good on and were socially acceptable on guys, they'd wear them too.
I actually laughed out loud at 630am at your comment... thank you!
You mean knickers
xenonscreams wrote:
Not true. You run better when you believe in yourself. This is why some women wear makeup to races. It's not about looking pretty, it's about feeling confident, and for some women makeup does that. For Maggie Vessey it's all of those homemade outfits. For almost everyone ever, it's changing into their racing flats or spikes, because let's be honest, they don't actually make you that much faster. But the ritual of putting them on tells you "it's time to run fast" and so you do. You can't run slow in spankies and spikes. It just doesn't feel right.
In any case, in general, the less clothing you have on you when you run (provided it's warm enough), the more comfortable, and I'm pretty sure if spankies looked good on and were socially acceptable on guys, they'd wear them too.
So, you're saying you would compete naked like at the first Olympics?
Ash shah,
I'm not sure if you're imagining xenonscreams running naked (with your tongue hanging out) or asking the question with a quizzical (or doubtful) look on your face.
xenonscreams wrote:
Not true. You run better when you believe in yourself. This is why some women wear makeup to races. It's not about looking pretty, it's about feeling confident, and for some women makeup does that. For Maggie Vessey it's all of those homemade outfits. For almost everyone ever, it's changing into their racing flats or spikes, because let's be honest, they don't actually make you that much faster. But the ritual of putting them on tells you "it's time to run fast" and so you do. You can't run slow in spankies and spikes. It just doesn't feel right.
In any case, in general, the less clothing you have on you when you run (provided it's warm enough), the more comfortable, and I'm pretty sure if spankies looked good on and were socially acceptable on guys, they'd wear them too.
so why didn't you do all this in that 10k you attempted on the track?
[quote]Math :( Soccer
Yo Momma wrote:
Was that sarcasm? I am calibrating my sarcasmo meter, and I need to know
Hey Yo Momma, no I wasn't being sarcastic. I thought it was kind of a cute comment ("This thread is useful with all the pics.") It made me smile, since everyone always says, "useless without pics"!
I still don't really know the terminology, though. Like are "spankies" the tight-fitting shorts, or the bikini bottoms?
Also, with regard to those bikini bottoms (or "bun-huggers") I think there is still room for improvement. Please refer to the outfits worn by the women beach volleyball players to see how improvements could be made.
Volleyball shorts are what they call "boy-shorts", I believe, and I prefer the boy shorts over bunhuggers (spankies) myself as a male observer. And I will tell you why. The shorts really emphasize the gap and lips, whereas the diagonal lines created by bunhuggers create a triangle-like inward tapering visual effect that makes the thigh-gap appear smaller and de-emphasizes the outline of the vulva.
horny runner guy wrote:
Volleyball shorts are what they call "boy-shorts", I believe, and I prefer the boy shorts over bunhuggers (spankies) myself as a male observer. And I will tell you why. The shorts really emphasize the gap and lips, whereas the diagonal lines created by bunhuggers create a triangle-like inward tapering visual effect that makes the thigh-gap appear smaller and de-emphasizes the outline of the vulva.
Thigh gap is mandatory. Also, no buns or volleyball shorts on any chick older than 19 or fatter than 110lb.
fashion police wrote:
Thigh gap is mandatory. Also, no buns or volleyball shorts on any chick older than 19 or fatter than 110lb.
officer, I beg to differ on your second point. I have seen many a milf rock a pair of huggers and/or boyshorts.
officer, I beg to differ on your second point. I have seen many a milf rock a pair of huggers and/or boyshorts.[/quote]
Ahhhh yes. Maybe it's because I'm older but there is something about a milf who can wear spankies and look good. Mmmmmm
runn wrote:
officer, I beg to differ on your second point. I have seen many a milf rock a pair of huggers and/or boyshorts.
Ahhhh yes. Maybe it's because I'm older but there is something about a milf who can wear spankies and look good. Mmmmmm[/quote]
Look, it ain't the milfs or 20 year olds who can rock the buns that are the problem, it's the ones who think they're hot but they're not. One delusional fattie or oldie can ruin the look for everybody. We just need the 19/110 cutoff to protect our eyes.
Sorry, officer, I must disagree. I have never been offended by the fatness of a woman. such things do not offend me.
