Pew Poll shows gun rights over gun control

Keep on digging, Barney Fife!

Chewbacca wrote:

Keep on digging, Barney Fife!

Keep on being a coward "chicken little."

Dirty Harry Chewy Killa wrote:

For the second time dimwit, we are armed so we aren't afraid of $hit:)

.

Ok, the year isn't over yet, but you've sealed the deal on biggest idiot on the boards by far! Congrats.

First, the guy who can't go 3 words without resorting to "LIBTARD!!" "BUTTHURT!!" "TROOF!" ,etc infantile "comebacks" is calling someone else a "dimwit" ??? Seriously? And this is also the guy who referred to the "SHagrin of libtards" ? Shagrin? That's a new one. I will to look that one up!

Secondly, why arm yourselves to the hilt if you aren't scared of anything as you claim? Just so you can feel artificially tough?? That's an even stupider reason. But you ARE scared, in fact, prettified, like a cowering little child. Scared to death that some black man is coming to get you, or take your woman because you can't satisfy her properly, or that King George or King Obama is coming to take your rights away! lol Scared and clinging to his guns in his bunker! Too funny.

Stupid, racist, and paranoid is no way to go through life, idiot. Enjoy your FreeDUMB, scared little boy.

I love that every single time you post you expose your "Butt Hurt" of Epic Proportions for everyone that frequents these boards to read.

We all know how much the freedom of others disturbs you. We know you are an evil libtard that would do everything in its power to kill anyone whom did not agree with your stupid socialist agenda.

Haha you lose you evil SOB. Free Americans WIN:)

Stay scared of the free people. You should be scared because we will kick your socialist arse 100% of the time. We always do libtard:) we always do;)

Butthurtosaurus Rexing wrote:

I love that every single time you post you expose your "Butt Hurt" of Epic Proportions for everyone that frequents these boards to read.

Haha you lose you evil SOB. Free Americans WIN:)

Stay scared of the free people. You should be scared because we will kick your socialist arse 100% of the time. We always do libtard:) we always do;)

Claimed I was "Butthurt" ? CHECK! (twice, including your name)

Called me "LIBTARD!" ? CHECK! (also twice)

Made absolutely no sense (CHECK!).

You are nothing if not consistent.

If you are not even a little ashamed of your unoriginal, childish, repetitive, ridiculous behavior on here, then....... I don't know what to tell you. I really, truly don't.

(hey, I can admit at least that I'm a little embarrassed that I even respond to someone of your incredibly immature, inane, and pathetic ways, yes, I at least can admit that. But let me guess: you think this is a good use of your time? Honestly?! You think that you are "scoring points" against those evil socialists, and showing them who's boss by calling them "libtard," and "butthurt", over, and over, and over and over and OVER again, ad nauseam ?? God help if you if you do. you can't truly be amusing yourself to any degree with this idiocy, can you? It's not possible, is it? No one's life is THAT sad and wasted is it?? For the life of me, I just can't imagine what else could possess someone to repeat such infantile schtick. But I guess many conservatives truly, truly are this sad and pathetic. I find it shocking, but I guess it's true. wow. )

That is right you evil butt hurt libtard. We the People always kick your arse.

You must really like the beating we put on you. You always come back for more and we always oblige you:)

Hahaha!

Butthurtosaurus Rexing wrote:

That is right you evil butt hurt libtard. We the People always kick your arse.

You must really like the beating we put on you. You always come back for more and we always oblige you:)

Hahaha!

oh.......my........god.

truly mind boggling.

Yes, my racist, low IQ, gun-nut, right wing friend, you "win." I have no proper response to "LIBTARD!!!!" "HA HA U R BUTTHURT!!!!" "USA, USA, USA!" and "DAT's DA TROOF!!!". Nothing, it is too much of a powerful rebuttal to all things progressive, liberal, and democratic, especially when you say it literally 100's of times. Especially the repetition part. Really, you've convinced us all. We give up, you are the champion debater, and the superior intellect, and it's clear for all to see.

But can I get a couple more LIBTARD!'s and possibly a few more BUTT-HURT!'s, and lastly a USA FTW!!! and at least one "TROOF!" for the road? Now that I've 'lost', I at least need a few final words of your wisdom to guide me toward the light. Because you know, I don't think I've quite understood the subtly of your position, and I think this will straighten me out a bit on the nuances of your philosophy. Thank you kind sir, I eagerly await it and will study your words carefully for their deep, and fascinating meaning.

556NATO wrote:

What the NRA and 'far right' oppose are new gun laws which will do nothing to stop the violence problem

There is no violence problem you bunch of droning half-wits.

Slightly more than 10,000 out of 300 million Americans are killed by guns every year, some by their own selves. 1 out of 30,000, or 0.0033 percent. That's only half as many as are killed by drug-resistant staph infections and a third as many as by auto accidents. The number has been declining steadily for years.

So all of you saying that guns are dangerous and need to be controlled are WRONG.

And all of you saying that you need guns for protection are EQUALLY WRONG.

This is another one of those meaningless issues stirred up and maintained for the nefarious purposes of various politicians and economic sectors. It gets votes and it sells guns too. But it has nothing to do with the real spirit of the 2nd amendment, which is to protect the people from the government. The United States was created largely through militia action by armed citizens. Though they soft-pedaled their language, the founders clearly wanted to preserve the ability of the people to rebel, and they failed. That ship sailed long ago.

Next time you hear about someone killed by a gun, try to assemble 300 million of something, one at a time. That will give you some perspective. In a nation of that many people, OF COURSE someone's gonna get shot. Every day. Big deal. Kick the news habit.

You type so much yet write nothing.

Thank God all libtards are as stupid as you.

1.) it is funny

2.) it is easy to kick your a$$

Hahaha

Butthurtosaurus Rexing wrote:

You type so much yet write nothing.

Thank God all libtards are as stupid as you.

I know, I know, you're right, we "libtards" and all of our silly words, i.e., if you can't say in a slogan, or maybe in a "tweet", then it's not worth saying, or at least will be ignored due to attention deficit disorders. I get it. I am learning. Your message is: "K.I.S.S."- Keep It Simple Stupid. For instance, rely on 3 or 4 "power" words to get your message across, like, I don't know, maybe "LIBTARD!" or "BUTTHURT!!!" or "USA FTW!", or something along those lines. That will coney your message clearly, and forcefully, and convince all reading that your logic and points are unassailable, and that you are man of learning, and purpose. Excellent, I will jump on board this powerful train of debating tactics, and in the future, ride it to victory. Thank you again, kind sir, for your tips.

P.S. Thank you very much for the "libtard" you included in your post, however, I can't feel at least a little let down or disappointed seeing as there were no "BUTTHURTS" (except for you name of course) or "USA USA!"'s thrown in. But I am no position to complain, and will accept with gratitude and graciousness the wisdom you did bestow upon me. I am starting to see the "light", i.e., the right way of thinking.

Bad Wigins wrote:

There is no violence problem you bunch of droning half-wits.

Slightly more than 10,000 out of 300 million Americans are killed by guns every year, some by their own selves. 1 out of 30,000, or 0.0033 percent. That's only half as many as are killed by drug-resistant staph infections and a third as many as by auto accidents. The number has been declining steadily for years.

So all of you saying that guns are dangerous and need to be controlled are WRONG.

And all of you saying that you need guns for protection are EQUALLY WRONG.

Next time you hear about someone killed by a gun, try to assemble 300 million of something, one at a time. That will give you some perspective. In a nation of that many people, OF COURSE someone's gonna get shot. Every day. Big deal. Kick the news habit.

Oh wiggo, wiggo, wiggo. Where to begin? Because a country has a lot of people, therefore one should EXPECT 10,000's of them to get killed by guns each year, and not bat an eyelash??? And because there are other factors that result in lots of deaths (sometimes to the elderly) and cause more deaths than guns, then.....who cares about gun deaths, they're no big deal? THAT's your "reasoning" ???? And *you* are the one calling people "half-wits" ?? With this last post of yours (and others), you've registered barely a half-step above the "LIBTARD BUTTHURT!" guy.

Not to mention you messed up your stats royally. Apparently you began looking at homicide rates, but then moved on to total guns deaths and conflated the two. Because......your #'s are way off. You stated that "slightly more than 1 out of 30,000 Americans are killed by guns every year, some by their own selves", when it is 1 in TEN thousand. Whoops, off by 3x! (yes, you were discussing the issue of "violence", but you mentioned suicides and the issues of guns not being dangerous[which includes the issue of accidents], and wrote about a total # of gun deaths. So you got confused.....you half-wit). And this gun death total is actually very close to the # of auto deaths per year, a # that has been dropping rapidly (you erroneously said that GUN deaths have been dropping, they have not), and could be a lot lower if we actually enforced our speeding and drunk driving laws.

Lastly, lots of other countries have LOTS OF PEOPLE, but don't have LOTS (or at least "lots" compared to us) of gun deaths. Does the UK have a "lots" of people? Of course. How many gun deaths per 100,000 do they have (the US has 10 per 100,000) ? 0.25. FORTY X less than us. And Japan, do they have lots of people? Sure, 127 million. Try lining up 127 million of something, you'll see, it's a lot, I promise you. And how many gun deaths per 100,000? 0.06. Yes, you read that correctly:

ZERO POINT ZERO SIX. 170 x fewer guns deaths per capita than the good ol' USA And one of the main reasons why that is??

They have way, way, WAY less guns in their country than we do (same with the UK).

And your conclusion from all of this is: "hey man, guns aren't dangerous, and there really are hardly any gun deaths in this country, this is just a made up issue by politicians and the media trying to get you on the "new habit" ". ???

I don't know what "habit" you've got, but it's f-cking up your brain badly, if this is your reasoning and conclusion.

You being "butt hurt" CHECK

Free People legally owning firearms CHECK

Libtards getting thrown out office CHECK

You and other libtards getting their arse handed to them CHECK CHECK

You being on the losing end of the issue 100% of the time CHECK CHECK and CHECK

This bringing Free Americans JOY Uber CHECK.

Haha you libtard loser. You lose, you always do. Ha ha ha ha ha.

fasdfasdfasdfsadf wrote:

Neutral Observer wrote:

I hope we trust them because if they did decide to turn the military against us then I doubt you peashooter would be very helpful.

Such tired rhetoric. Iraqi insurgents and the Viet Cong did pretty well against the US military with their peashooters.

Brah,

The North Vietnamese definitely had more than peashooters brah. They had the backing and military support of the Soviets and the Chinese, see here...

So, if I am understanding what you're implying in your post (that is, we citizens need our guns to defend against our own military turning on us)...well 1) that is truly paranoid, crazy thinking. Yes such things have happened in history but only the most cynical, frankly delusional person would believe the US is in any way similar to those historical examples and that members of the US military (who are overwhelmingly conservative and pro gun) would follow such orders 2) if such an outlandish thing were to happen who would provide military support to US citizens (a la the Soviets and Chinese in Vietnam) because we would need that to even attempt to fend off our well armed military?

Brah, my guess would be it would have to be someone who shares the same beliefs (or at least the same type of ridiculous, archaic, delusional thought processes) as the majority of gun owners in this country. Given this poll...

I would say ISIS would be the most likely to provided support to the right wingers in this country since both of these groups think along the same lines, though they do have different names for their Gods. Maybe you should give tem a call and start talks so you're prepared for the upcoming inevitable showdown with the government.

Another sore loser on the issue.

A lot of politicians in Congress thought like you. Now they are on their way out of office complements of "We the People."

Free Americans FTW.

Guns don't make you more free, or safer.

You can't use guns against the NSA, and you should be much more afraid of them.

Gun deaths are preventable in the US, but only if there is a buyback on the order of more than 200mm guns, and a repeal of the 2nd amendment. And this is not going to happen. So the US is going to have to get used to a murder rate that is 3x that of other modern, non-gun countries.

People are welcome to create these narratives around the idea of guns, but these are jsut stories. Nobody really needs a gun, except in extreme circumstances. Please don't forget the entire text of the 2nd amendment:

[quote]

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

[/quote}

So where is the militia? Could it be that the idea of a standing army - rather than a volunteer army - was not part of the thinking? And that a standing army actually nullifies the validity of this right?

You have no clue what "Freedom" is.

But at least you know that American Citizens will never be disarmed. So there is some hope for you.

NYT is BS wrote:

Guns will always be in the hands of the American Citizenry much to the shagrin of the leftist libtard loons that slither amongst us.

Poor spelling and slanderous name calling aside, the beginning of that sentence is true.

The second amendment is not going to be repealed.

ALMFD wrote:

You have no clue what "Freedom" is.

So please define it.

And more specifically, how absent guns, one is not free. How the citizens of Canada, Europe, Japan, Australia etc are not free because they cannot own a gun just because they decide they want one.

556NATO wrote:

You do realize background checks are already in place, correct?

Every time a new gun is bought, the buyer fills out a 4473 NICS check which the FBI has to approve and give a 'PROCEED' prior to purpose.

What the NRA and 'far right' oppose are new gun laws which will do nothing to stop the violence problem, i,e, banning 'features like pistol grips and barrel shrouds, public registrations of gun owners (like sex offenders), and sin taxes on guns and ammunition.

Oh, and the things the NRA opposes are just those that the United States Supreme Court were already ruled Unconstitional in District of Columbia vs Heller, 2008.

Bloomberg and his buddies just like to forget this part...

If someone purchases a firearm from a private seller at a gun show a background check is not required.

So your first sentence is false since you said "EVERY time a new gun is bought".

Right now a person with documented mental issues or a criminal history can easily legally purchase weapons without being screened.

And the NRA fights hard to keep this legal.

Are we saying that Americans feel it's more important to have the right to firearms than it is to be safe about who can get them and how?

We feel we have the right to drive and to own vehicles but we must go through a process to obtain and receive a license to do so and each vehicle purchased to be driven on the road must be registered.

I don't see people revolting against these restrictions to drive like they do for restrictions for weapons.