easy weeks wrote:
imsmarterthanu wrote:You're an idiot. That's 6:14 for 63 miles.. incredible
Aww, did I hurt your feelings, bro?
No it's not incredible. As I mentioned, pretty well any sub-2:20 marathoner could have a go at this and have a decent chance of beating it. Therefore, this 'record' is only a record due to lack of real interest.
McMillan has it equivalent to 2:12:39.
Do you people honestly believe there is any accuracy whatsoever in these equivalents? Calculators are just extremely wild-ass guesses, especially when the paces are over 1:00 per mile apart.