Great legs!!!
What's the problem?
Great legs!!!
What's the problem?
are you blind? it wasn't the legs
The. OP is right. Her outfits are more "fashion forward" than "fashion conscious". I thought they were great. We could use more Vesseys in this sport!
Maggie used to look great without this stuff. looks absolutely ridiculous in the outfits and the massive makeup layer she's been sporting recently. Simple sports bra top and huggers, sans cakey makeup, is all any fit female athlete needs for competition.
Hoes will be hoes. At least she's a ho with a pretty face.
She's 32 years old dressing like a fashion model trying to stay in the 800m game by whatever means possible, it's sad really.
Doesn't she wear less in her races?
Is this any better?
jerusalemartichoke wrote:
scroll down the home page to "stars in the news". are we really supposed to applaud Maggie Vessey for an outfit like that? I know that modesty was thrown out the window years ago in women's track, but this is ridiculous.
luv da hoes wrote:
Hoes will be hoes. At least she's a ho with a pretty face.
_______________________________
Why do you feel the need to call her a ho? This is so stupid! Why can't we just get rid of this nonsense of insulting women for their sexual behavior, or in this case, perceived sexual behavior?
I don't care if Maggie Vessey gets with 10 guys a week. It tells us nothing about whether she is a smart, responsible, or morally decent person. We don't usually conflate sexuality and morality with men in our society. Stop doing it with women.
Feminist lessons of the day:
1. If you like looking at fit women's bodies, stop calling them hoes when they wear revealing clothing.
2. It's possible to find a woman sexually attractive and still respect her humanity--but y'all on this message board seem to have a LOT of trouble with that.
Sleeping with 10 guys a week has never been morally permissible in the vast majority of world cultures, and particularly not in her country of origin, the United States.